20,438 research outputs found
On the Expressive Power of Multiple Heads in CHR
Constraint Handling Rules (CHR) is a committed-choice declarative language
which has been originally designed for writing constraint solvers and which is
nowadays a general purpose language. CHR programs consist of multi-headed
guarded rules which allow to rewrite constraints into simpler ones until a
solved form is reached. Many empirical evidences suggest that multiple heads
augment the expressive power of the language, however no formal result in this
direction has been proved, so far.
In the first part of this paper we analyze the Turing completeness of CHR
with respect to the underneath constraint theory. We prove that if the
constraint theory is powerful enough then restricting to single head rules does
not affect the Turing completeness of the language. On the other hand,
differently from the case of the multi-headed language, the single head CHR
language is not Turing powerful when the underlying signature (for the
constraint theory) does not contain function symbols.
In the second part we prove that, no matter which constraint theory is
considered, under some reasonable assumptions it is not possible to encode the
CHR language (with multi-headed rules) into a single headed language while
preserving the semantics of the programs. We also show that, under some
stronger assumptions, considering an increasing number of atoms in the head of
a rule augments the expressive power of the language.
These results provide a formal proof for the claim that multiple heads
augment the expressive power of the CHR language.Comment: v.6 Minor changes, new formulation of definitions, changed some
details in the proof
Logic programming in the context of multiparadigm programming: the Oz experience
Oz is a multiparadigm language that supports logic programming as one of its
major paradigms. A multiparadigm language is designed to support different
programming paradigms (logic, functional, constraint, object-oriented,
sequential, concurrent, etc.) with equal ease. This article has two goals: to
give a tutorial of logic programming in Oz and to show how logic programming
fits naturally into the wider context of multiparadigm programming. Our
experience shows that there are two classes of problems, which we call
algorithmic and search problems, for which logic programming can help formulate
practical solutions. Algorithmic problems have known efficient algorithms.
Search problems do not have known efficient algorithms but can be solved with
search. The Oz support for logic programming targets these two problem classes
specifically, using the concepts needed for each. This is in contrast to the
Prolog approach, which targets both classes with one set of concepts, which
results in less than optimal support for each class. To explain the essential
difference between algorithmic and search programs, we define the Oz execution
model. This model subsumes both concurrent logic programming
(committed-choice-style) and search-based logic programming (Prolog-style).
Instead of Horn clause syntax, Oz has a simple, fully compositional,
higher-order syntax that accommodates the abilities of the language. We
conclude with lessons learned from this work, a brief history of Oz, and many
entry points into the Oz literature.Comment: 48 pages, to appear in the journal "Theory and Practice of Logic
Programming
FO(FD): Extending classical logic with rule-based fixpoint definitions
We introduce fixpoint definitions, a rule-based reformulation of fixpoint
constructs. The logic FO(FD), an extension of classical logic with fixpoint
definitions, is defined. We illustrate the relation between FO(FD) and FO(ID),
which is developed as an integration of two knowledge representation paradigms.
The satisfiability problem for FO(FD) is investigated by first reducing FO(FD)
to difference logic and then using solvers for difference logic. These
reductions are evaluated in the computation of models for FO(FD) theories
representing fairness conditions and we provide potential applications of
FO(FD).Comment: Presented at ICLP 2010. 16 pages, 1 figur
The DLV System for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
This paper presents the DLV system, which is widely considered the
state-of-the-art implementation of disjunctive logic programming, and addresses
several aspects. As for problem solving, we provide a formal definition of its
kernel language, function-free disjunctive logic programs (also known as
disjunctive datalog), extended by weak constraints, which are a powerful tool
to express optimization problems. We then illustrate the usage of DLV as a tool
for knowledge representation and reasoning, describing a new declarative
programming methodology which allows one to encode complex problems (up to
-complete problems) in a declarative fashion. On the foundational
side, we provide a detailed analysis of the computational complexity of the
language of DLV, and by deriving new complexity results we chart a complete
picture of the complexity of this language and important fragments thereof.
Furthermore, we illustrate the general architecture of the DLV system which
has been influenced by these results. As for applications, we overview
application front-ends which have been developed on top of DLV to solve
specific knowledge representation tasks, and we briefly describe the main
international projects investigating the potential of the system for industrial
exploitation. Finally, we report about thorough experimentation and
benchmarking, which has been carried out to assess the efficiency of the
system. The experimental results confirm the solidity of DLV and highlight its
potential for emerging application areas like knowledge management and
information integration.Comment: 56 pages, 9 figures, 6 table
- …