Improving the scalability of parallel N-body applications with an event driven constraint based execution model

The scalability and efficiency of graph applications are significantly constrained by conventional systems and their supporting programming models. Technology trends like multicore, manycore, and heterogeneous system architectures are introducing further challenges and possibilities for emerging application domains such as graph applications. This paper explores the space of effective parallel execution of ephemeral graphs that are dynamically generated using the Barnes-Hut algorithm to exemplify dynamic workloads. The workloads are expressed using the semantics of an Exascale computing execution model called ParalleX. For comparison, results using conventional execution model semantics are also presented. We find improved load balancing during runtime and automatic parallelism discovery improving efficiency using the advanced semantics for Exascale computing.Comment: 11 figure

Beyond Dataflow

This paper presents some recent advanced dataflow architectures. While the dataflow concept offers the potential of high performance, the performance of an actual dataflow implementation can be restricted by a limited number of functional units, limited memory bandwidth, and the need to associatively match pending operations with available functional units. Since the early 1970s, there have been significant developments in both fundamental research and practical realizations of dataflow models of computation. In particular, there has been active research and development in multithreaded architectures that evolved from the dataflow model. Also some other techniques for combining control-flow and dataflow emerged, such as coarse-grain dataflow, dataflow with complex machine operations, RISC dataflow, and micro dataflow. These developments have also had certain impact on the conception of highperformance superscalar processors in the “post-RISC” era

Executing matrix multiply on a process oriented data flow machine

The Process-Oriented Dataflow System (PODS) is an execution model that combines the von Neumann and dataflow models of computation to gain the benefits of each. Central to PODS is the concept of array distribution and its effects on partitioning and mapping of processes.In PODS arrays are partitioned by simply assigning consecutive elements to each processing element (PE) equally. Since PODS uses single assignment, there will be only one producer of each element. This producing PE owns that element and will perform the necessary computations to assign it. Using this approach the filling loop is distributed across the PEs. This simple partitioning and mapping scheme provides excellent results for executing scientific code on MIMD machines. In this way PODS allows MIMD machines to exploit vector and data parallelism easily while still providing the flexibility of MIMD over SIMD for multi-user systems.In this paper, the classic matrix multiply algorithm, with 1024 data points, is executed on a PODS simulator and the results are presented and discussed. Matrix multiply is a good example because it has several interesting properties: there are multiple code-blocks; a new array must be dynamically allocated and distributed; there is a loop-carried dependency in the innermost loop; the two input arrays have different access patterns; and the sizes of the input arrays are not known at compile time. Matrix multiply also forms the basis for many important scientific algorithms such as: LU decomposition, convolution, and the Fast-Fourier Transform.The results show that PODS is comparable to both Iannucci's Hybrid Architecture and MIT's TTDA in terms of overhead and instruction power. They also show that PODS easily distributes the work load evenly across the PEs. The key result is that PODS can scale matrix multiply in a near linear fashion until there is little or no work to be performed for each PE. Then overhead and message passing become a major component of the execution time. With larger problems (e.g., >/=16k data points) this limit would be reached at around 256 PEs

Exploiting iteration-level parallelism in dataflow programs

The term "dataflow" generally encompasses three distinct aspects of computation - a data-driven model of computation, a functional/declarative programming language, and a special-purpose multiprocessor architecture. In this paper we decouple the language and architecture issues by demonstrating that declarative programming is a suitable vehicle for the programming of conventional distributed-memory multiprocessors.This is achieved by appling several transformations to the compiled declarative program to achieve iteration-level (rather than instruction-level) parallelism. The transformations first group individual instructions into sequential light-weight processes, and then insert primitives to: (1) cause array allocation to be distributed over multiple processors, (2) cause computation to follow the data distribution by inserting an index filtering mechanism into a given loop and spawning a copy of it on all PEs; the filter causes each instance of that loop to operate on a different subrange of the index variable.The underlying model of computation is a dataflow/von Neumann hybrid in that exection within a process is control-driven while the creation, blocking, and activation of processes is data-driven.The performance of this process-oriented dataflow system (PODS) is demonstrated using the hydrodynamics simulation benchmark called SIMPLE, where a 19-fold speedup on a 32-processor architecture has been achieved

PARSECSs: Evaluating the impact of task parallelism in the PARSEC benchmark suite

In this work, we show how parallel applications can be implemented efficiently using task parallelism. We also evaluate the benefits of such parallel paradigm with respect to other approaches. We use the PARSEC benchmark suite as our test bed, which includes applications representative of a wide range of domains from HPC to desktop and server applications. We adopt different parallelization techniques, tailored to the needs of each application, to fully exploit the task-based model. Our evaluation shows that task parallelism achieves better performance than thread-based parallelization models, such as Pthreads. Our experimental results show that we can obtain scalability improvements up to 42% on a 16-core system and code size reductions up to 81%. Such reductions are achieved by removing from the source code application specific schedulers or thread pooling systems and transferring these responsibilities to the runtime system software.This work has been partially supported by the European Research Council under the European Union 7th FP, ERC Grant Agreement number 321253, by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under grant TIN2012-34557, by the Severo Ochoa Program, awarded by the Spanish Government, under grant SEV-2011-00067 and by the HiPEAC Network of Excellence. M. Moreto has been partially supported by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness under Juan de la Cierva post-doctoral fellowship number JCI-2012-15047, and M. Casas is supported by the Secretary for Universities and Research of the Ministry of Economy and Knowledge of the Government of Catalonia and the Co-fund programme of the Marie Curie Actions of the 7th R&D Framework Programme of the European Union (Contract 2013 BP B 00243). Finally, the authors are grateful to the reviewers for their valuable comments, to the people from the Programming Models Group at BSC for their technical support, to the RoMoL team, and to Xavier Teruel, Roger Ferrer and Paul Caheny for their help in this work.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft