26 research outputs found

    Combining ontologies and rules with clinical archetypes

    Get PDF
    Al igual que otros campos que dependen en gran medida de las funcionalidades ofrecidas por las tecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones (IT), la biomedicina y la salud necesitan cada vez más la implantación de normas y mecanismos ampliamente aceptados para el intercambio de datos, información y conocimiento. Dicha necesidad de compatibilidad e interoperabilidad va más allá de las cuestiones sintácticas y estructurales, pues la interoperabilidad semántica es también requerida. La interoperabilidad a nivel semántico es esencial para el soporte computarizado de alertas, flujos de trabajo y de la medicina basada en evidencia cuando contamos con la presencia de sistemas heterogéneos de Historia Clínica Electrónica (EHR). El modelo de arquetipos clínicos respaldado por el estándar CEN/ISO EN13606 y la fundación openEHR ofrece un mecanismo para expresar las estructuras de datos clínicos de manera compartida e interoperable. El modelo ha ido ganando aceptación en los últimos años por su capacidad para definir conceptos clínicos basados en un Modelo de Referencia común. Dicha separación a dos capas permite conservar la heterogeneidad de las implementaciones de almacenamiento a bajo nivel, presentes en los diferentes sistemas de EHR. Sin embargo, los lenguajes de arquetipos no soportan la representación de reglas clínicas ni el mapeo a ontologías formales, ambos elementos fundamentales para alcanzar la interoperabilidad semántica completa pues permiten llevar a cabo el razonamiento y la inferencia a partir del conocimiento clínico existente. Paralelamente, es reconocido el hecho de que la World Wide Web presenta requisitos análogos a los descritos anteriormente, lo cual ha fomentado el desarrollo de la Web Semántica. El progreso alcanzado en este terreno, con respecto a la representación del conocimiento y al razonamiento sobre el mismo, es combinado en esta tesis con los modelos de EHR con el objetivo de mejorar el enfoque de los arquetipos clínicos y ofrecer funcionalidades que se corresponden con nivel más alto de interoperabilidad semántica. Concretamente, la investigación que se describe a continuación presenta y evalúa un enfoque para traducir automáticamente las definiciones expresadas en el lenguaje de definición de arquetipos de openEHR (ADL) a una representación formal basada en lenguajes de ontologías. El método se implementa en la plataforma ArchOnt, que también es descrita. A continuación se estudia la integración de dichas representaciones formales con reglas clínicas, ofreciéndose un enfoque para reutilizar el razonamiento con instancias concretas de datos clínicos. Es importante ver como el acto de compartir el conocimiento clínico expresado a través de reglas es coherente con la filosofía de intercambio abierto fomentada por los arquetipos, a la vez que se extiende la reutilización a proposiciones de conocimiento declarativo como las utilizadas en las guías de práctica clínica. De esta manera, la tesis describe una técnica de mapeo de arquetipos a ontologías, para luego asociar reglas clínicas a la representación resultante. La traducción automática también permite la conexión formal de los elementos especificados en los arquetipos con conceptos clínicos equivalentes provenientes de otras fuentes como son las terminologías clínicas. Dichos enlaces fomentan la reutilización del conocimiento clínico ya representado, así como el razonamiento y la navegación a través de distintas ontologías clínicas. Otra contribución significativa de la tesis es la aplicación del enfoque mencionado en dos proyectos de investigación y desarrollo clínico, llevados a cabo en combinación con hospitales universitarios de Madrid. En la explicación se incluyen ejemplos de las aplicaciones más representativas del enfoque como es el caso del desarrollo de sistemas de alertas orientados a mejorar la seguridad del paciente. No obstante, la traducción automática de arquetipos clínicos a lenguajes de ontologías constituye una base común para la implementación de una amplia gama de actividades semánticas, razonamiento y validación, evitándose así la necesidad de aplicar distintos enfoques ad-hoc directamente sobre los arquetipos para poder satisfacer las condiciones de cada contexto

    What Role Can Process Mining Play in Recurrent Clinical Guidelines Issues? A Position Paper

    Get PDF
    [EN] In the age of Evidence-Based Medicine, Clinical Guidelines (CGs) are recognized to be an indispensable tool to support physicians in their daily clinical practice. Medical Informatics is expected to play a relevant role in facilitating diffusion and adoption of CGs. However, the past pioneering approaches, often fragmented in many disciplines, did not lead to solutions that are actually exploited in hospitals. Process Mining for Healthcare (PM4HC) is an emerging discipline gaining the interest of healthcare experts, and seems able to deal with many important issues in representing CGs. In this position paper, we briefly describe the story and the state-of-the-art of CGs, and the efforts and results of the past approaches of medical informatics. Then, we describe PM4HC, and we answer questions like how can PM4HC cope with this challenge? Which role does PM4HC play and which rules should be employed for the PM4HC scientific community?Gatta, R.; Vallati, M.; Fernández Llatas, C.; Martinez-Millana, A.; Orini, S.; Sacchi, L.; Lenkowicz, J.... (2020). What Role Can Process Mining Play in Recurrent Clinical Guidelines Issues? A Position Paper. International Journal of Environmental research and Public Health (Online). 17(18):1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186616S1191718Guyatt, G. (1992). Evidence-Based Medicine. JAMA, 268(17), 2420. doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032Hripcsak, G., Ludemann, P., Pryor, T. A., Wigertz, O. B., & Clayton, P. D. (1994). Rationale for the Arden Syntax. Computers and Biomedical Research, 27(4), 291-324. doi:10.1006/cbmr.1994.1023Peleg, M. (2013). Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines: A methodological review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 46(4), 744-763. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2013.06.009Van de Velde, S., Heselmans, A., Delvaux, N., Brandt, L., Marco-Ruiz, L., Spitaels, D., … Flottorp, S. (2018). A systematic review of trials evaluating success factors of interventions with computerised clinical decision support. Implementation Science, 13(1). doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0790-1Rawson, T. M., Moore, L. S. P., Hernandez, B., Charani, E., Castro-Sanchez, E., Herrero, P., … Holmes, A. H. (2017). A systematic review of clinical decision support systems for antimicrobial management: are we failing to investigate these interventions appropriately? Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 23(8), 524-532. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2017.02.028Greenes, R. A., Bates, D. W., Kawamoto, K., Middleton, B., Osheroff, J., & Shahar, Y. (2018). Clinical decision support models and frameworks: Seeking to address research issues underlying implementation successes and failures. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 78, 134-143. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2017.12.005Garcia, C. dos S., Meincheim, A., Faria Junior, E. R., Dallagassa, M. R., Sato, D. M. V., Carvalho, D. R., … Scalabrin, E. E. (2019). Process mining techniques and applications – A systematic mapping study. Expert Systems with Applications, 133, 260-295. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.05.003Bhargava, A., Kim, T., Quine, D. B., & Hauser, R. G. (2019). A 20-Year Evaluation of LOINC in the United States’ Largest Integrated Health System. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 144(4), 478-484. doi:10.5858/arpa.2019-0055-oaLee, D., de Keizer, N., Lau, F., & Cornet, R. (2014). Literature review of SNOMED CT use. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21(e1), e11-e19. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001636TROTTI, A., COLEVAS, A., SETSER, A., RUSCH, V., JAQUES, D., BUDACH, V., … COLEMAN, C. (2003). CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment. Seminars in Radiation Oncology, 13(3), 176-181. doi:10.1016/s1053-4296(03)00031-6Daniel, C., & Kalra, D. (2019). Clinical Research Informatics: Contributions from 2018. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 28(01), 203-205. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1677921Marco-Ruiz, L., Pedrinaci, C., Maldonado, J. A., Panziera, L., Chen, R., & Bellika, J. G. (2016). Publication, discovery and interoperability of Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Linked Data approach. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 62, 243-264. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2016.07.011Marcos, C., González-Ferrer, A., Peleg, M., & Cavero, C. (2015). Solving the interoperability challenge of a distributed complex patient guidance system: a data integrator based on HL7’s Virtual Medical Record standard. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22(3), 587-599. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocv003Wulff, A., Haarbrandt, B., Tute, E., Marschollek, M., Beerbaum, P., & Jack, T. (2018). An interoperable clinical decision-support system for early detection of SIRS in pediatric intensive care using openEHR. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 89, 10-23. doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2018.04.012Chen, C., Chen, K., Hsu, C.-Y., Chiu, W.-T., & Li, Y.-C. (Jack). (2010). A guideline-based decision support for pharmacological treatment can improve the quality of hyperlipidemia management. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 97(3), 280-285. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2009.12.004Anani, N., Mazya, M. V., Chen, R., Prazeres Moreira, T., Bill, O., Ahmed, N., … Koch, S. (2017). Applying openEHR’s Guideline Definition Language to the SITS international stroke treatment registry: a European retrospective observational study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 17(1). doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0401-5Eddy, D. M. (1982). Clinical Policies and the Quality of Clinical Practice. New England Journal of Medicine, 307(6), 343-347. doi:10.1056/nejm198208053070604Guyatt, G. H. (1990). Then-of-1 Randomized Controlled Trial: Clinical Usefulness. Annals of Internal Medicine, 112(4), 293. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-112-4-293CHALMERS, I. (1993). The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1 Doing More Go), 156-165. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26345.xWoolf, S. H., Grol, R., Hutchinson, A., Eccles, M., & Grimshaw, J. (1999). Clinical guidelines: Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ, 318(7182), 527-530. doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7182.527Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. (2004). BMJ, 328(7454), 1490. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 336(7650), 924-926. doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.adHill, J., Bullock, I., & Alderson, P. (2011). A Summary of the Methods That the National Clinical Guideline Centre Uses to Produce Clinical Guidelines for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Annals of Internal Medicine, 154(11), 752. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-154-11-201106070-00007Qaseem, A. (2012). Guidelines International Network: Toward International Standards for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Annals of Internal Medicine, 156(7), 525. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-156-7-201204030-00009Rosenfeld, R. M., Nnacheta, L. C., & Corrigan, M. D. (2015). Clinical Consensus Statement Development Manual. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 153(2_suppl), S1-S14. doi:10.1177/0194599815601394De Boeck, K., Castellani, C., & Elborn, J. S. (2014). Medical consensus, guidelines, and position papers: A policy for the ECFS. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 13(5), 495-498. doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2014.06.012Clinical Practical Guidelineshttp://www.openclinical.org/guidelines.htmlHaynes, A. B., Weiser, T. G., Berry, W. R., Lipsitz, S. R., Breizat, A.-H. S., Dellinger, E. P., … Gawande, A. A. (2009). A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population. New England Journal of Medicine, 360(5), 491-499. doi:10.1056/nejmsa0810119Grigg, E. (2015). Smarter Clinical Checklists. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 121(2), 570-573. doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000000352Hales, B., Terblanche, M., Fowler, R., & Sibbald, W. (2007). Development of medical checklists for improved quality of patient care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 20(1), 22-30. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm062Greenfield, S. (2017). Clinical Practice Guidelines. JAMA, 317(6), 594. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.19969Vegting, I. L., van Beneden, M., Kramer, M. H. H., Thijs, A., Kostense, P. J., & Nanayakkara, P. W. B. (2012). How to save costs by reducing unnecessary testing: Lean thinking in clinical practice. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 23(1), 70-75. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2011.07.003Drummond, M. (2016). Clinical Guidelines: A NICE Way to Introduce Cost-Effectiveness Considerations? Value in Health, 19(5), 525-530. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.020Prior, M., Guerin, M., & Grimmer-Somers, K. (2008). The effectiveness of clinical guideline implementation strategies - a synthesis of systematic review findings. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 14(5), 888-897. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01014.xWatts, C. G., Dieng, M., Morton, R. L., Mann, G. J., Menzies, S. W., & Cust, A. E. (2014). Clinical practice guidelines for identification, screening and follow-up of individuals at high risk of primary cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review. British Journal of Dermatology, 172(1), 33-47. doi:10.1111/bjd.13403Woolf, S., Schünemann, H. J., Eccles, M. P., Grimshaw, J. M., & Shekelle, P. (2012). Developing clinical practice guidelines: types of evidence and outcomes; values and economics, synthesis, grading, and presentation and deriving recommendations. Implementation Science, 7(1). doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-61Legido-Quigley, H., Panteli, D., Brusamento, S., Knai, C., Saliba, V., Turk, E., … Busse, R. (2012). Clinical guidelines in the European Union: Mapping the regulatory basis, development, quality control, implementation and evaluation across member states. Health Policy, 107(2-3), 146-156. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.08.004Rashidian, A., Eccles, M. P., & Russell, I. (2008). Falling on stony ground? A qualitative study of implementation of clinical guidelines’ prescribing recommendations in primary care. Health Policy, 85(2), 148-161. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.07.011Yang, W.-S., & Hwang, S.-Y. (2006). A process-mining framework for the detection of healthcare fraud and abuse. Expert Systems with Applications, 31(1), 56-68. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2005.09.003Kose, I., Gokturk, M., & Kilic, K. (2015). An interactive machine-learning-based electronic fraud and abuse detection system in healthcare insurance. Applied Soft Computing, 36, 283-299. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.07.018Pryor, T. A., Gardner, R. M., Clayton, P. D., & Warner, H. R. (1983). The HELP system. Journal of Medical Systems, 7(2), 87-102. doi:10.1007/bf00995116Shahar, Y., Miksch, S., & Johnson, P. (1998). The Asgaard project: a task-specific framework for the application and critiquing of time-oriented clinical guidelines. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 14(1-2), 29-51. doi:10.1016/s0933-3657(98)00015-3Boxwala, A. A., Peleg, M., Tu, S., Ogunyemi, O., Zeng, Q. T., Wang, D., … Shortliffe, E. H. (2004). GLIF3: a representation format for sharable computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 37(3), 147-161. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2004.04.002Terenziani, P., Molino, G., & Torchio, M. (2001). A modular approach for representing and executing clinical guidelines. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 23(3), 249-276. doi:10.1016/s0933-3657(01)00087-2Sutton, D. R., & Fox, J. (2003). The Syntax and Semantics of the PROformaGuideline Modeling Language. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 10(5), 433-443. doi:10.1197/jamia.m1264Musen, M. A., Tu, S. W., Das, A. K., & Shahar, Y. (1996). EON: A Component-Based Approach to Automation of Protocol-Directed Therapy. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 3(6), 367-388. doi:10.1136/jamia.1996.97084511Ciccarese, P., Caffi, E., Quaglini, S., & Stefanelli, M. (2005). Architectures and tools for innovative Health Information Systems: The Guide Project. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 74(7-8), 553-562. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.02.001Shiffman, R. N., & Greenes, R. A. (1994). Improving Clinical Guidelines with Logic and Decision-table Techniques. Medical Decision Making, 14(3), 245-254. doi:10.1177/0272989x9401400306Peleg, M., Tu, S., Bury, J., Ciccarese, P., Fox, J., Greenes, R. A., … Stefanelli, M. (2003). Comparing Computer-interpretable Guideline Models: A Case-study Approach. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 10(1), 52-68. doi:10.1197/jamia.m1135Karadimas, H., Ebrahiminia, V., & Lepage, E. (2018). User-defined functions in the Arden Syntax: An extension proposal. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 92, 103-110. doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2015.11.003Peleg, M., Keren, S., & Denekamp, Y. (2008). Mapping computerized clinical guidelines to electronic medical records: Knowledge-data ontological mapper (KDOM). Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 41(1), 180-201. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2007.05.003German, E., Leibowitz, A., & Shahar, Y. (2009). An architecture for linking medical decision-support applications to clinical databases and its evaluation. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 203-218. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.10.007Marcos, M., Maldonado, J. A., Martínez-Salvador, B., Boscá, D., & Robles, M. (2013). Interoperability of clinical decision-support systems and electronic health records using archetypes: A case study in clinical trial eligibility. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 46(4), 676-689. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2013.05.004Marco-Ruiz, L., Moner, D., Maldonado, J. A., Kolstrup, N., & Bellika, J. G. (2015). Archetype-based data warehouse environment to enable the reuse of electronic health record data. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 84(9), 702-714. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.05.016Gooch, P., & Roudsari, A. (2011). Computerization of workflows, guidelines, and care pathways: a review of implementation challenges for process-oriented health information systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18(6), 738-748. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000033Quaglini, S., Stefanelli, M., Cavallini, A., Micieli, G., Fassino, C., & Mossa, C. (2000). Guideline-based careflow systems. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 20(1), 5-22. doi:10.1016/s0933-3657(00)00050-6Schadow, G., Russler, D. C., & McDonald, C. J. (2001). Conceptual alignment of electronic health record data with guideline and workflow knowledge. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 64(2-3), 259-274. doi:10.1016/s1386-5056(01)00196-4González-Ferrer, A., ten Teije, A., Fdez-Olivares, J., & Milian, K. (2013). Automated generation of patient-tailored electronic care pathways by translating computer-interpretable guidelines into hierarchical task networks. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 57(2), 91-109. doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2012.08.008Shabo, A., Parimbelli, E., Quaglini, S., Napolitano, C., & Peleg, M. (2016). Interplay between Clinical Guidelines and Organizational Workflow Systems. Methods of Information in Medicine, 55(06), 488-494. doi:10.3414/me16-01-0006Mulyar, N., van der Aalst, W. M. P., & Peleg, M. (2007). A Pattern-based Analysis of Clinical Computer-interpretable Guideline Modeling Languages. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14(6), 781-787. doi:10.1197/jamia.m2389Grando, M. A., Glasspool, D., & Fox, J. (2012). A formal approach to the analysis of clinical computer-interpretable guideline modeling languages. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 54(1), 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2011.07.001Kaiser, K., & Marcos, M. (2015). Leveraging workflow control patterns in the domain of clinical practice guidelines. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 16(1). doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0253-zMartínez-Salvador, B., & Marcos, M. (2016). Supporting the Refinement of Clinical Process Models to Computer-Interpretable Guideline Models. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 58(5), 355-366. doi:10.1007/s12599-016-0443-3Decision Model and Notation Version 1.0https://www.omg.org/spec/DMN/1.0Ghasemi, M., & Amyot, D. (2016). Process mining in healthcare: a systematised literature review. International Journal of Electronic Healthcare, 9(1), 60. doi:10.1504/ijeh.2016.078745Rebuge, Á., & Ferreira, D. R. (2012). Business process analysis in healthcare environments: A methodology based on process mining. Information Systems, 37(2), 99-116. doi:10.1016/j.is.2011.01.003Rovani, M., Maggi, F. M., de Leoni, M., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2015). Declarative process mining in healthcare. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(23), 9236-9251. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.040Rojas, E., Munoz-Gama, J., Sepúlveda, M., & Capurro, D. (2016). Process mining in healthcare: A literature review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 61, 224-236. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2016.04.007Lenkowicz, J., Gatta, R., Masciocchi, C., Casà, C., Cellini, F., Damiani, A., … Valentini, V. (2018). Assessing the conformity to clinical guidelines in oncology. Management Decision, 56(10), 2172-2186. doi:10.1108/md-09-2017-0906Fernández-Llatas, C., Benedi, J.-M., García-Gómez, J., & Traver, V. (2013). Process Mining for Individualized Behavior Modeling Using Wireless Tracking in Nursing Homes. Sensors, 13(11), 15434-15451. doi:10.3390/s131115434Qu, G., Liu, Z., Cui, S., & Tang, J. (2013). Study on Self-Adaptive Clinical Pathway Decision Support System Based on Case-Based Reasoning. Frontier and Future Development of Information Technology in Medicine and Education, 969-978. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7618-0_95Van de Velde, S., Roshanov, P., Kortteisto, T., Kunnamo, I., Aertgeerts, B., Vandvik, P. O., & Flottorp, S. (2015). Tailoring implementation strategies for evidence-based recommendations using computerised clinical decision support systems: protocol for the development of the GUIDES tools. Implementation Science, 11(1). doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0393-

    Computing Healthcare Quality Indicators Automatically: Secondary Use of Patient Data and Semantic Interoperability

    Get PDF
    Harmelen, F.A.H. van [Promotor]Keizer, N.F. de [Copromotor]Cornet, R. [Copromotor]Teije, A.C.M. [Copromotor

    Combining ontologies and rules with clinical archetypes

    Get PDF
    Al igual que otros campos que dependen en gran medida de las funcionalidades ofrecidas por las tecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones (IT), la biomedicina y la salud necesitan cada vez más la implantación de normas y mecanismos ampliamente aceptados para el intercambio de datos, información y conocimiento. Dicha necesidad de compatibilidad e interoperabilidad va más allá de las cuestiones sintácticas y estructurales, pues la interoperabilidad semántica es también requerida. La interoperabilidad a nivel semántico es esencial para el soporte computarizado de alertas, flujos de trabajo y de la medicina basada en evidencia cuando contamos con la presencia de sistemas heterogéneos de Historia Clínica Electrónica (EHR). El modelo de arquetipos clínicos respaldado por el estándar CEN/ISO EN13606 y la fundación openEHR ofrece un mecanismo para expresar las estructuras de datos clínicos de manera compartida e interoperable. El modelo ha ido ganando aceptación en los últimos años por su capacidad para definir conceptos clínicos basados en un Modelo de Referencia común. Dicha separación a dos capas permite conservar la heterogeneidad de las implementaciones de almacenamiento a bajo nivel, presentes en los diferentes sistemas de EHR. Sin embargo, los lenguajes de arquetipos no soportan la representación de reglas clínicas ni el mapeo a ontologías formales, ambos elementos fundamentales para alcanzar la interoperabilidad semántica completa pues permiten llevar a cabo el razonamiento y la inferencia a partir del conocimiento clínico existente. Paralelamente, es reconocido el hecho de que la World Wide Web presenta requisitos análogos a los descritos anteriormente, lo cual ha fomentado el desarrollo de la Web Semántica. El progreso alcanzado en este terreno, con respecto a la representación del conocimiento y al razonamiento sobre el mismo, es combinado en esta tesis con los modelos de EHR con el objetivo de mejorar el enfoque de los arquetipos clínicos y ofrecer funcionalidades que se corresponden con nivel más alto de interoperabilidad semántica. Concretamente, la investigación que se describe a continuación presenta y evalúa un enfoque para traducir automáticamente las definiciones expresadas en el lenguaje de definición de arquetipos de openEHR (ADL) a una representación formal basada en lenguajes de ontologías. El método se implementa en la plataforma ArchOnt, que también es descrita. A continuación se estudia la integración de dichas representaciones formales con reglas clínicas, ofreciéndose un enfoque para reutilizar el razonamiento con instancias concretas de datos clínicos. Es importante ver como el acto de compartir el conocimiento clínico expresado a través de reglas es coherente con la filosofía de intercambio abierto fomentada por los arquetipos, a la vez que se extiende la reutilización a proposiciones de conocimiento declarativo como las utilizadas en las guías de práctica clínica. De esta manera, la tesis describe una técnica de mapeo de arquetipos a ontologías, para luego asociar reglas clínicas a la representación resultante. La traducción automática también permite la conexión formal de los elementos especificados en los arquetipos con conceptos clínicos equivalentes provenientes de otras fuentes como son las terminologías clínicas. Dichos enlaces fomentan la reutilización del conocimiento clínico ya representado, así como el razonamiento y la navegación a través de distintas ontologías clínicas. Otra contribución significativa de la tesis es la aplicación del enfoque mencionado en dos proyectos de investigación y desarrollo clínico, llevados a cabo en combinación con hospitales universitarios de Madrid. En la explicación se incluyen ejemplos de las aplicaciones más representativas del enfoque como es el caso del desarrollo de sistemas de alertas orientados a mejorar la seguridad del paciente. No obstante, la traducción automática de arquetipos clínicos a lenguajes de ontologías constituye una base común para la implementación de una amplia gama de actividades semánticas, razonamiento y validación, evitándose así la necesidad de aplicar distintos enfoques ad-hoc directamente sobre los arquetipos para poder satisfacer las condiciones de cada contexto

    An experimental study and evaluation of a new architecture for clinical decision support - integrating the openEHR specifications for the Electronic Health Record with Bayesian Networks

    Get PDF
    Healthcare informatics still lacks wide-scale adoption of intelligent decision support methods, despite continuous increases in computing power and methodological advances in scalable computation and machine learning, over recent decades. The potential has long been recognised, as evidenced in the literature of the domain, which is extensively reviewed. The thesis identifies and explores key barriers to adoption of clinical decision support, through computational experiments encompassing a number of technical platforms. Building on previous research, it implements and tests a novel platform architecture capable of processing and reasoning with clinical data. The key components of this platform are the now widely implemented openEHR electronic health record specifications and Bayesian Belief Networks. Substantial software implementations are used to explore the integration of these components, guided and supplemented by input from clinician experts and using clinical data models derived in hospital settings at Moorfields Eye Hospital. Data quality and quantity issues are highlighted. Insights thus gained are used to design and build a novel graph-based representation and processing model for the clinical data, based on the openEHR specifications. The approach can be implemented using diverse modern database and platform technologies. Computational experiments with the platform, using data from two clinical domains – a preliminary study with published thyroid metabolism data and a substantial study of cataract surgery – explore fundamental barriers that must be overcome in intelligent healthcare systems developments for clinical settings. These have often been neglected, or misunderstood as implementation procedures of secondary importance. The results confirm that the methods developed have the potential to overcome a number of these barriers. The findings lead to proposals for improvements to the openEHR specifications, in the context of machine learning applications, and in particular for integrating them with Bayesian Networks. The thesis concludes with a roadmap for future research, building on progress and findings to date

    Preface

    Get PDF

    Front-Line Physicians' Satisfaction with Information Systems in Hospitals

    Get PDF
    Day-to-day operations management in hospital units is difficult due to continuously varying situations, several actors involved and a vast number of information systems in use. The aim of this study was to describe front-line physicians' satisfaction with existing information systems needed to support the day-to-day operations management in hospitals. A cross-sectional survey was used and data chosen with stratified random sampling were collected in nine hospitals. Data were analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistical methods. The response rate was 65 % (n = 111). The physicians reported that information systems support their decision making to some extent, but they do not improve access to information nor are they tailored for physicians. The respondents also reported that they need to use several information systems to support decision making and that they would prefer one information system to access important information. Improved information access would better support physicians' decision making and has the potential to improve the quality of decisions and speed up the decision making process.Peer reviewe

    Steps towards interoperability in healthcare environment

    Get PDF
    Tese doutoramento - Programa Doutoral em Engenharia Biomédica, Informática MédicaHealthcare units have complex Information Systems (IS) made up from heterogeneous data sources, which speak di erent languages and with di erent objectives. Nevertheless, all these sources have indeed important information that can contribute in an active way to provide a healthcare system of excellence. The evolution that has been noticed in Health IS has promoted the development of new methodologies and tools that are intended to solve this complicated problem. In this manner, one of the main paradigms that arises is the interoperability among systems and its capability to allow a general and simpli ed access to relevant information. Another aspect that should be kept in mind, given the constrains of the global economic situation, is the reduction in the investment in national healthcare systems. This thesis is based on a set of studies performed at the Centro Hospitalar do T^amega e Sousa (CHTS) in which the main goals are promoting an improvement in the relation patient-hospital, having in consideration the reduction of implementation costs, but preserving the quality of information. The last one should be accessible everywhere and at anytime to help with clinical decision and, in the future, be available for clinical studies through data computationally interpretable. To do so, an Electronic Semantic Health Record was formalized and implemented, with the help of the clinical sta , which collects all the information considered important and relevant. This Health Record was delivered through a platform for the distribution and archive of clinical information, named Agency for the Integration, Di usion and Archive (AIDA), which is supported by intelligent agents that treat data in an ex-haustive and structured way. To test the proposed model and system and in order to strengthen the relation between the patient and the hospital, an appointment alert system based on SMS and electronic mail was developed, which allowed the reduction of non-programmed misses and that provided a decrease of costs by better re-distributed appointment schedules, and allocate human resources and physical spaces in a more e ective manner. Finally, to reduce stopping periods of systems and to promote the user's con dence on Information Systems, an open-source tool was developed that enables the scheduling of preventive actions according to a mathematical model. These tools allowed for a continuous improvement of systems and are currently well accepted by clinicians and Information Technologies (IT) specialists inside the healthcare unit, proving in real clinical situation the e ectiveness and usability of the model.As unidades de saúde possuem Sistemas de Informação (SI) complexos, compostos por fontes de dados heterogéneas com objectivos distintos. Por em, toda a informação e importante e pode contribuir de forma ativa para a prestação de cuidados de saúde de excelência. Com a evolução dos SI na Saúde novas metodologias têm sido desenvolvidas com o intuito de solucionar este problema complicado. Nesta perspectiva, um dos principais paradigmas que se coloca e a interoperabilidade entre sistemas e a sua capacidade para permitir um acesso simples a informação relevante. Outro factor relevante relaciona-se com os constrangimentos financeiros que toda a economia global atravessa e que se reflete numa diminuição no investimento nos servi cos nacionais de saúde. Esta tese tem como base um conjunto de estudos realizados no Centro Hospitalar do Tâmega e Sousa cujos principais objetivos se prendem com um esforço orientado para a melhoria da relação paciente-hospital, tendo em conta a redução de custos de implementação, mas garantindo sobretudo a qualidade de informação. Esta dever a estar disponível em qualquer lugar e a qualquer altura para o auxílio a decisão clinica e, em última instancia, disponível para estudos cl nicos através de dados interpretáveis computacionalmente. Para tal, recorreu-se a ajuda de pessoal clinico para a implementação de um Processo Clínico Eletrónico Semântico que recolhe toda a informação considerada relevante. Este Processo Clínico foi potenciado através de uma plataforma para a distribuição e arquivo de informação clinica, denominada de Agencia para a Interoperação, Difusão e Arquivo (AIDA), baseada em agentes inteligentes que tratam os dados de forma estruturada. Para testar o modelo e de forma a fortalecer a relação paciente-hospital foi desenvolvido um sistema de alertas para consulta via mensagens escritas e e-mail, que diminuiu o numero de faltas não programadas, proporcionando uma redução de custos através de uma redistribuição dos tempos de consulta alocando recursos humanos e físicos de forma mais eficaz. Por fim, com vista a redução dos tempos de paragem de sistemas, e potenciar a confiança dos utilizadores nos mesmos, foi desenvolvida uma ferramenta baseada em tecnologia open-source que permite o agendamento de intervenções preventivas de acordo com um modelo matemático. Esta ferramenta proporcionou uma melhoria contínua dos sistemas e está globalmente aceite por cl nicos e especialistas de Tecnologias de Informação (TI), provando em situações clínicas reais a usabilidade e eficácia do modelo
    corecore