Exploiting Structure in Backtracking Algorithms for Propositional and Probabilistic Reasoning

Boolean propositional satisfiability (SAT) and probabilistic reasoning represent two core problems in AI. Backtracking based algorithms have been applied in both problems. In this thesis, I investigate structure-based techniques for solving real world SAT and Bayesian networks, such as software testing and medical diagnosis instances. When solving a SAT instance using backtracking search, a sequence of decisions must be made as to which variable to branch on or instantiate next. Real world problems are often amenable to a divide-and-conquer strategy where the original instance is decomposed into independent sub-problems. Existing decomposition techniques are based on pre-processing the static structure of the original problem. I propose a dynamic decomposition method based on hypergraph separators. Integrating this dynamic separator decomposition into the variable ordering of a modern SAT solver leads to speedups on large real world SAT problems. Encoding a Bayesian network into a CNF formula and then performing weighted model counting is an effective method for exact probabilistic inference. I present two encodings for improving this approach with noisy-OR and noisy-MAX relations. In our experiments, our new encodings are more space efficient and can speed up the previous best approaches over two orders of magnitude. The ability to solve similar problems incrementally is critical for many probabilistic reasoning problems. My aim is to exploit the similarity of these instances by forwarding structural knowledge learned during the analysis of one instance to the next instance in the sequence. I propose dynamic model counting and extend the dynamic decomposition and caching technique to multiple runs on a series of problems with similar structure. This allows us to perform Bayesian inference incrementally as the evidence, parameter, and structure of the network change. Experimental results show that my approach yields significant improvements over previous model counting approaches on multiple challenging Bayesian network instances

Structure and Complexity in Planning with Unary Operators

Unary operator domains -- i.e., domains in which operators have a single effect -- arise naturally in many control problems. In its most general form, the problem of STRIPS planning in unary operator domains is known to be as hard as the general STRIPS planning problem -- both are PSPACE-complete. However, unary operator domains induce a natural structure, called the domain's causal graph. This graph relates between the preconditions and effect of each domain operator. Causal graphs were exploited by Williams and Nayak in order to analyze plan generation for one of the controllers in NASA's Deep-Space One spacecraft. There, they utilized the fact that when this graph is acyclic, a serialization ordering over any subgoal can be obtained quickly. In this paper we conduct a comprehensive study of the relationship between the structure of a domain's causal graph and the complexity of planning in this domain. On the positive side, we show that a non-trivial polynomial time plan generation algorithm exists for domains whose causal graph induces a polytree with a constant bound on its node indegree. On the negative side, we show that even plan existence is hard when the graph is a directed-path singly connected DAG. More generally, we show that the number of paths in the causal graph is closely related to the complexity of planning in the associated domain. Finally we relate our results to the question of complexity of planning with serializable subgoals

09461 Abstracts Collection -- Algorithms and Applications for Next Generation SAT Solvers

From 8th to 13th November 2009, the Dagstuhl Seminar 09461 "Algorithms and Applications for Next Generation SAT Solvers" was held in Schloss Dagstuhl--Leibniz Center for Informatics. During the seminar, several participants presented their current research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section describes the seminar topics and goals in general. Links to extended abstracts, slides or full papers are provided, if available

CP-nets: A Tool for Representing and Reasoning withConditional Ceteris Paribus Preference Statements

Information about user preferences plays a key role in automated decision making. In many domains it is desirable to assess such preferences in a qualitative rather than quantitative way. In this paper, we propose a qualitative graphical representation of preferences that reflects conditional dependence and independence of preference statements under a ceteris paribus (all else being equal) interpretation. Such a representation is often compact and arguably quite natural in many circumstances. We provide a formal semantics for this model, and describe how the structure of the network can be exploited in several inference tasks, such as determining whether one outcome dominates (is preferred to) another, ordering a set outcomes according to the preference relation, and constructing the best outcome subject to available evidence