21,899 research outputs found
Experimental Evidence for Quantum Structure in Cognition
We proof a theorem that shows that a collection of experimental data of
membership weights of items with respect to a pair of concepts and its
conjunction cannot be modeled within a classical measure theoretic weight
structure in case the experimental data contain the effect called
overextension. Since the effect of overextension, analogue to the well-known
guppy effect for concept combinations, is abundant in all experiments testing
weights of items with respect to pairs of concepts and their conjunctions, our
theorem constitutes a no-go theorem for classical measure structure for common
data of membership weights of items with respect to concepts and their
combinations. We put forward a simple geometric criterion that reveals the non
classicality of the membership weight structure and use experimentally measured
membership weights estimated by subjects in experiments to illustrate our
geometrical criterion. The violation of the classical weight structure is
similar to the violation of the well-known Bell inequalities studied in quantum
mechanics, and hence suggests that the quantum formalism and hence the modeling
by quantum membership weights can accomplish what classical membership weights
cannot do.Comment: 12 pages, 3 figure
Human Perception as a Phenomenon of Quantization
For two decades, the formalism of quantum mechanics has been successfully
used to describe human decision processes, situations of heuristic reasoning,
and the contextuality of concepts and their combinations. The phenomenon of
'categorical perception' has put us on track to find a possible deeper cause of
the presence of this quantum structure in human cognition. Thus, we show that
in an archetype of human perception consisting of the reconciliation of a
bottom up stimulus with a top down cognitive expectation pattern, there arises
the typical warping of categorical perception, where groups of stimuli clump
together to form quanta, which move away from each other and lead to a
discretization of a dimension. The individual concepts, which are these quanta,
can be modeled by a quantum prototype theory with the square of the absolute
value of a corresponding Schr\"odinger wave function as the fuzzy prototype
structure, and the superposition of two such wave functions accounts for the
interference pattern that occurs when these concepts are combined. Using a
simple quantum measurement model, we analyze this archetype of human
perception, provide an overview of the experimental evidence base for
categorical perception with the phenomenon of warping leading to quantization,
and illustrate our analyses with two examples worked out in detail.Comment: 28 pages, 8 figure
On the Foundations of the Brussels Operational-Realistic Approach to Cognition
The scientific community is becoming more and more interested in the research
that applies the mathematical formalism of quantum theory to model human
decision-making. In this paper, we provide the theoretical foundations of the
quantum approach to cognition that we developed in Brussels. These foundations
rest on the results of two decade studies on the axiomatic and
operational-realistic approaches to the foundations of quantum physics. The
deep analogies between the foundations of physics and cognition lead us to
investigate the validity of quantum theory as a general and unitary framework
for cognitive processes, and the empirical success of the Hilbert space models
derived by such investigation provides a strong theoretical confirmation of
this validity. However, two situations in the cognitive realm, 'question order
effects' and 'response replicability', indicate that even the Hilbert space
framework could be insufficient to reproduce the collected data. This does not
mean that the mentioned operational-realistic approach would be incorrect, but
simply that a larger class of measurements would be in force in human
cognition, so that an extended quantum formalism may be needed to deal with all
of them. As we will explain, the recently derived 'extended Bloch
representation' of quantum theory (and the associated 'general
tension-reduction' model) precisely provides such extended formalism, while
remaining within the same unitary interpretative framework.Comment: 21 page
Quantum Structure in Cognition, Origins, Developments, Successes and Expectations
We provide an overview of the results we have attained in the last decade on
the identification of quantum structures in cognition and, more specifically,
in the formalization and representation of natural concepts. We firstly discuss
the quantum foundational reasons that led us to investigate the mechanisms of
formation and combination of concepts in human reasoning, starting from the
empirically observed deviations from classical logical and probabilistic
structures. We then develop our quantum-theoretic perspective in Fock space
which allows successful modeling of various sets of cognitive experiments
collected by different scientists, including ourselves. In addition, we
formulate a unified explanatory hypothesis for the presence of quantum
structures in cognitive processes, and discuss our recent discovery of further
quantum aspects in concept combinations, namely, 'entanglement' and
'indistinguishability'. We finally illustrate perspectives for future research.Comment: 25 pages. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1412.870
Classical Logical versus Quantum Conceptual Thought: Examples in Economics, Decision theory and Concept Theory
Inspired by a quantum mechanical formalism to model concepts and their
disjunctions and conjunctions, we put forward in this paper a specific
hypothesis. Namely that within human thought two superposed layers can be
distinguished: (i) a layer given form by an underlying classical deterministic
process, incorporating essentially logical thought and its indeterministic
version modeled by classical probability theory; (ii) a layer given form under
influence of the totality of the surrounding conceptual landscape, where the
different concepts figure as individual entities rather than (logical)
combinations of others, with measurable quantities such as 'typicality',
'membership', 'representativeness', 'similarity', 'applicability', 'preference'
or 'utility' carrying the influences. We call the process in this second layer
'quantum conceptual thought', which is indeterministic in essence, and contains
holistic aspects, but is equally well, although very differently, organized
than logical thought. A substantial part of the 'quantum conceptual thought
process' can be modeled by quantum mechanical probabilistic and mathematical
structures. We consider examples of three specific domains of research where
the effects of the presence of quantum conceptual thought and its deviations
from classical logical thought have been noticed and studied, i.e. economics,
decision theory, and concept theories and which provide experimental evidence
for our hypothesis.Comment: 14 page
- …