8 research outputs found

    Embodied-driven design : a framework to configure body representation & mapping(æœŹæ–‡)

    Get PDF

    Experiencing ones own hand in telexistence manipulation with a 15 DOF anthropomorphic robot hand and a flexible master glove

    No full text

    Humanoid Robots

    Get PDF
    For many years, the human being has been trying, in all ways, to recreate the complex mechanisms that form the human body. Such task is extremely complicated and the results are not totally satisfactory. However, with increasing technological advances based on theoretical and experimental researches, man gets, in a way, to copy or to imitate some systems of the human body. These researches not only intended to create humanoid robots, great part of them constituting autonomous systems, but also, in some way, to offer a higher knowledge of the systems that form the human body, objectifying possible applications in the technology of rehabilitation of human beings, gathering in a whole studies related not only to Robotics, but also to Biomechanics, Biomimmetics, Cybernetics, among other areas. This book presents a series of researches inspired by this ideal, carried through by various researchers worldwide, looking for to analyze and to discuss diverse subjects related to humanoid robots. The presented contributions explore aspects about robotic hands, learning, language, vision and locomotion

    Télé-opération Corps Complet de Robots Humanoïdes

    Get PDF
    This thesis aims to investigate systems and tools for teleoperating a humanoid robot. Robotteleoperation is crucial to send and control robots in environments that are dangerous or inaccessiblefor humans (e.g., disaster response scenarios, contaminated environments, or extraterrestrialsites). The term teleoperation most commonly refers to direct and continuous control of a robot.In this case, the human operator guides the motion of the robot with her/his own physical motionor through some physical input device. One of the main challenges is to control the robot in a waythat guarantees its dynamical balance while trying to follow the human references. In addition,the human operator needs some feedback about the state of the robot and its work site through remotesensors in order to comprehend the situation or feel physically present at the site, producingeffective robot behaviors. Complications arise when the communication network is non-ideal. Inthis case the commands from human to robot together with the feedback from robot to human canbe delayed. These delays can be very disturbing for the human operator, who cannot teleoperatetheir robot avatar in an effective way.Another crucial point to consider when setting up a teleoperation system is the large numberof parameters that have to be tuned to effectively control the teleoperated robots. Machinelearning approaches and stochastic optimizers can be used to automate the learning of some of theparameters.In this thesis, we proposed a teleoperation system that has been tested on the humanoid robotiCub. We used an inertial-technology-based motion capture suit as input device to control thehumanoid and a virtual reality headset connected to the robot cameras to get some visual feedback.We first translated the human movements into equivalent robot ones by developping a motionretargeting approach that achieves human-likeness while trying to ensure the feasibility of thetransferred motion. We then implemented a whole-body controller to enable the robot to trackthe retargeted human motion. The controller has been later optimized in simulation to achieve agood tracking of the whole-body reference movements, by recurring to a multi-objective stochasticoptimizer, which allowed us to find robust solutions working on the real robot in few trials.To teleoperate walking motions, we implemented a higher-level teleoperation mode in whichthe user can use a joystick to send reference commands to the robot. We integrated this setting inthe teleoperation system, which allows the user to switch between the two different modes.A major problem preventing the deployment of such systems in real applications is the presenceof communication delays between the human input and the feedback from the robot: evena few hundred milliseconds of delay can irremediably disturb the operator, let alone a few seconds.To overcome these delays, we introduced a system in which a humanoid robot executescommands before it actually receives them, so that the visual feedback appears to be synchronizedto the operator, whereas the robot executed the commands in the past. To do so, the robot continuouslypredicts future commands by querying a machine learning model that is trained on pasttrajectories and conditioned on the last received commands.Cette thĂšse vise Ă  Ă©tudier des systĂšmes et des outils pour la tĂ©lĂ©-opĂ©ration d’un robot humanoĂŻde.La tĂ©lĂ©opĂ©ration de robots est cruciale pour envoyer et contrĂŽler les robots dans des environnementsdangereux ou inaccessibles pour les humains (par exemple, des scĂ©narios d’interventionen cas de catastrophe, des environnements contaminĂ©s ou des sites extraterrestres). Le terme tĂ©lĂ©opĂ©rationdĂ©signe le plus souvent le contrĂŽle direct et continu d’un robot. Dans ce cas, l’opĂ©rateurhumain guide le mouvement du robot avec son propre mouvement physique ou via un dispositifde contrĂŽle. L’un des principaux dĂ©fis est de contrĂŽler le robot de maniĂšre Ă  garantir son Ă©quilibredynamique tout en essayant de suivre les rĂ©fĂ©rences humaines. De plus, l’opĂ©rateur humain abesoin d’un retour d’information sur l’état du robot et de son site via des capteurs Ă  distance afind’apprĂ©hender la situation ou de se sentir physiquement prĂ©sent sur le site, produisant des comportementsde robot efficaces. Des complications surviennent lorsque le rĂ©seau de communicationn’est pas idĂ©al. Dans ce cas, les commandes de l’homme au robot ainsi que la rĂ©troaction du robotĂ  l’homme peuvent ĂȘtre retardĂ©es. Ces dĂ©lais peuvent ĂȘtre trĂšs gĂȘnants pour l’opĂ©rateur humain,qui ne peut pas tĂ©lĂ©-opĂ©rer efficacement son avatar robotique.Un autre point crucial Ă  considĂ©rer lors de la mise en place d’un systĂšme de tĂ©lĂ©-opĂ©rationest le grand nombre de paramĂštres qui doivent ĂȘtre rĂ©glĂ©s pour contrĂŽler efficacement les robotstĂ©lĂ©-opĂ©rĂ©s. Des approches d’apprentissage automatique et des optimiseurs stochastiques peuventĂȘtre utilisĂ©s pour automatiser l’apprentissage de certains paramĂštres.Dans cette thĂšse, nous avons proposĂ© un systĂšme de tĂ©lĂ©-opĂ©ration qui a Ă©tĂ© testĂ© sur le robothumanoĂŻde iCub. Nous avons utilisĂ© une combinaison de capture de mouvement basĂ©e sur latechnologie inertielle comme pĂ©riphĂ©rique de contrĂŽle pour l’humanoĂŻde et un casque de rĂ©alitĂ©virtuelle connectĂ© aux camĂ©ras du robot pour obtenir un retour visuel. Nous avons d’abord traduitles mouvements humains en mouvements robotiques Ă©quivalents en dĂ©veloppant une approchede retargeting de mouvement qui atteint la ressemblance humaine tout en essayant d’assurer lafaisabilitĂ© du mouvement transfĂ©rĂ©. Nous avons ensuite implĂ©mentĂ© un contrĂŽleur du corps entierpour permettre au robot de suivre le mouvement humain reciblĂ©. Le contrĂŽleur a ensuite Ă©tĂ©optimisĂ© en simulation pour obtenir un bon suivi des mouvements de rĂ©fĂ©rence du corps entier,en recourant Ă  un optimiseur stochastique multi-objectifs, ce qui nous a permis de trouver dessolutions robustes fonctionnant sur le robot rĂ©el en quelques essais.Pour tĂ©lĂ©-opĂ©rer les mouvements de marche, nous avons implĂ©mentĂ© un mode de tĂ©lĂ©-opĂ©rationde niveau supĂ©rieur dans lequel l’utilisateur peut utiliser un joystick pour envoyer des commandesde rĂ©fĂ©rence au robot. Nous avons intĂ©grĂ© ce paramĂštre dans le systĂšme de tĂ©lĂ©-opĂ©ration, ce quipermet Ă  l’utilisateur de basculer entre les deux modes diffĂ©rents.Un problĂšme majeur empĂȘchant le dĂ©ploiement de tels systĂšmes dans des applications rĂ©ellesest la prĂ©sence de retards de communication entre l’entrĂ©e humaine et le retour du robot: mĂȘmequelques centaines de millisecondes de retard peuvent irrĂ©mĂ©diablement perturber l’opĂ©rateur,encore plus quelques secondes. Pour surmonter ces retards, nous avons introduit un systĂšme danslequel un robot humanoĂŻde exĂ©cute des commandes avant de les recevoir, de sorte que le retourvisuel semble ĂȘtre synchronisĂ© avec l’opĂ©rateur, alors que le robot exĂ©cutait les commandes dansle passĂ©. Pour ce faire, le robot prĂ©dit en permanence les commandes futures en interrogeant unmodĂšle d’apprentissage automatique formĂ© sur les trajectoires passĂ©es et conditionnĂ© aux derniĂšrescommandes reçues

    Augmented Reality

    Get PDF
    Augmented Reality (AR) is a natural development from virtual reality (VR), which was developed several decades earlier. AR complements VR in many ways. Due to the advantages of the user being able to see both the real and virtual objects simultaneously, AR is far more intuitive, but it's not completely detached from human factors and other restrictions. AR doesn't consume as much time and effort in the applications because it's not required to construct the entire virtual scene and the environment. In this book, several new and emerging application areas of AR are presented and divided into three sections. The first section contains applications in outdoor and mobile AR, such as construction, restoration, security and surveillance. The second section deals with AR in medical, biological, and human bodies. The third and final section contains a number of new and useful applications in daily living and learning

    Ubiquitous haptic feedback in human-computer interaction through electrical muscle stimulation

    Get PDF
    [no abstract

    Presence 2005: the eighth annual international workshop on presence, 21-23 September, 2005 University College London (Conference proceedings)

    Get PDF
    OVERVIEW (taken from the CALL FOR PAPERS) Academics and practitioners with an interest in the concept of (tele)presence are invited to submit their work for presentation at PRESENCE 2005 at University College London in London, England, September 21-23, 2005. The eighth in a series of highly successful international workshops, PRESENCE 2005 will provide an open discussion forum to share ideas regarding concepts and theories, measurement techniques, technology, and applications related to presence, the psychological state or subjective perception in which a person fails to accurately and completely acknowledge the role of technology in an experience, including the sense of 'being there' experienced by users of advanced media such as virtual reality. The concept of presence in virtual environments has been around for at least 15 years, and the earlier idea of telepresence at least since Minsky's seminal paper in 1980. Recently there has been a burst of funded research activity in this area for the first time with the European FET Presence Research initiative. What do we really know about presence and its determinants? How can presence be successfully delivered with today's technology? This conference invites papers that are based on empirical results from studies of presence and related issues and/or which contribute to the technology for the delivery of presence. Papers that make substantial advances in theoretical understanding of presence are also welcome. The interest is not solely in virtual environments but in mixed reality environments. Submissions will be reviewed more rigorously than in previous conferences. High quality papers are therefore sought which make substantial contributions to the field. Approximately 20 papers will be selected for two successive special issues for the journal Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. PRESENCE 2005 takes place in London and is hosted by University College London. The conference is organized by ISPR, the International Society for Presence Research and is supported by the European Commission's FET Presence Research Initiative through the Presencia and IST OMNIPRES projects and by University College London
    corecore