Performance and power comparisons between Fermi and Cypress GPUs

In recent years, modern graphics processing units have been widely adopted in high performance computing areas to solve large scale computation problems. The leading GPU manufacturers Nvidia and AMD have introduced series of products to the market. While sharing many similar design concepts, GPUs from these two manufacturers differ in several aspects on processor cores and the memory subsystem. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive study to characterize and compare the architectural features of Nvidia’s Fermi and AMD’s Cypress GPUs. We first investigate the performance and power consumptions of an AMD Cypress GPU. By employing a rigorous statistical model to analyze the execution behaviors of representative general-purpose GPU (GPGPU) applications, we conduct insightful investigations on the target GPU architecture. Our results demonstrate that the GPU execution throughput and the power dissipation are dependent on different architectural variables. Furthermore, we design a set of micro-benchmarks to study the power consumption features of different function units on the GPU. Based on those results, we derive instructive principles that can guide the design of power-efficient high performance computing systems. We then make the concentration shift to the Nvidia Fermi GPU and compare it with the product from AMD. Our results indicate that these two products have diverse advantages that are reflected in their performance for different sets of applications. In addition, we also compare the energy efficiencies of these two platforms since power/energy consumption is a major concern in the high performance computing system

Analyzing and Predicting Processor Vulnerability to Soft Errors Using Statistical Techniques

The shrinking processor feature size, lower threshold voltage and increasing on-chip transistor density make current processors highly vulnerable to soft errors. Architectural Vulnerability Factor (AVF) reflects the probability that a raw soft error eventually causes a visible error in the program output, indicating the processor’s susceptibility to soft errors at architectural level. The awareness of the AVF, both at the early design stage and during program runtime, is greatly useful for designing reliable processors. However, measuring the AVF is extremely costly, resulting in large overheads in hardware, computation, and power. The situation is further exacerbated in a multi-threaded processor environment where resource contention and data sharing exist among different threads. Consequently, predicting the AVF from other easily-measured metrics becomes extraordinarily attractive to computer designers. We propose a series of AVF modeling and prediction works via using advanced statistical techniques. First, we utilize the Boosted Regression Trees (BRT) scheme to dynamically predict the AVF during program execution from a variety of performance metrics. This correlation is generalized to be across different workloads, program phases, and processor configurations on a single-threaded superscalar processor. Second, the AVF prediction is extended to multi-threaded processors where the inter-thread resource contention shows significant and non-uniform impacts on different programs; we propose a two-level predictive mechanism using BRT as building blocks to characterize the contention behavior. Finally, we employ a rule search strategy named Patient Rule Induction Method (PRIM) to explore a large processor design space at the early design stage. We are capable of generating selective rules on important configuration parameters. These rules quantify the design space subregion yielding lowest values of the response, thereby providing useful guidelines for designing reliable processors while achieving high performance

Exploiting heterogeneity in Chip-Multiprocessor Design

In the past decade, semiconductor manufacturers are persistent in building faster and smaller transistors in order to boost the processor performance as projected by Moore’s Law. Recently, as we enter the deep submicron regime, continuing the same processor development pace becomes an increasingly difficult issue due to constraints on power, temperature, and the scalability of transistors. To overcome these challenges, researchers propose several innovations at both architecture and device levels that are able to partially solve the problems. These diversities in processor architecture and manufacturing materials provide solutions to continuing Moore’s Law by effectively exploiting the heterogeneity, however, they also introduce a set of unprecedented challenges that have been rarely addressed in prior works. In this dissertation, we present a series of in-depth studies to comprehensively investigate the design and optimization of future multi-core and many-core platforms through exploiting heteroge-neities. First, we explore a large design space of heterogeneous chip multiprocessors by exploiting the architectural- and device-level heterogeneities, aiming to identify the optimal design patterns leading to attractive energy- and cost-efficiencies in the pre-silicon stage. After this high-level study, we pay specific attention to the architectural asymmetry, aiming at developing a heterogeneity-aware task scheduler to optimize the energy-efficiency on a given single-ISA heterogeneous multi-processor. An advanced statistical tool is employed to facilitate the algorithm development. In the third study, we shift our concentration to the device-level heterogeneity and propose to effectively leverage the advantages provided by different materials to solve the increasingly important reliability issue for future processors