2,456 research outputs found

    Stability and Invariant Random Subgroups

    Full text link
    Consider Sym(n)\operatorname{Sym}(n), endowed with the normalized Hamming metric dnd_n. A finitely-generated group Γ\Gamma is \emph{P-stable} if every almost homomorphism ρnk ⁣:ΓSym(nk)\rho_{n_k}\colon \Gamma\rightarrow\operatorname{Sym}(n_k) (i.e., for every g,hΓg,h\in\Gamma, limkdnk(ρnk(gh),ρnk(g)ρnk(h))=0\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}d_{n_k}( \rho_{n_k}(gh),\rho_{n_k}(g)\rho_{n_k}(h))=0) is close to an actual homomorphism φnk ⁣:ΓSym(nk)\varphi_{n_k} \colon\Gamma\rightarrow\operatorname{Sym}(n_k). Glebsky and Rivera observed that finite groups are P-stable, while Arzhantseva and P\u{a}unescu showed the same for abelian groups and raised many questions, especially about P-stability of amenable groups. We develop P-stability in general, and in particular for amenable groups. Our main tool is the theory of invariant random subgroups (IRS), which enables us to give a characterization of P-stability among amenable groups, and to deduce stability and instability of various families of amenable groups.Comment: 24 pages; v2 includes minor updates and new reference

    Dynamical properties of profinite actions

    Get PDF
    We study profinite actions of residually finite groups in terms of weak containment. We show that two strongly ergodic profinite actions of a group are weakly equivalent if and only if they are isomorphic. This allows us to construct continuum many pairwise weakly inequivalent free actions of a large class of groups, including free groups and linear groups with property (T). We also prove that for chains of subgroups of finite index, Lubotzky's property (τ\tau) is inherited when taking the intersection with a fixed subgroup of finite index. That this is not true for families of subgroups in general leads to answering the question of Lubotzky and Zuk, whether for families of subgroups, property (τ\tau) is inherited to the lattice of subgroups generated by the family. On the other hand, we show that for families of normal subgroups of finite index, the above intersection property does hold. In fact, one can give explicite estimates on how the spectral gap changes when passing to the intersection. Our results also have an interesting graph theoretical consequence that does not use the language of groups. Namely, we show that an expander covering tower of finite regular graphs is either bipartite or stays bounded away from being bipartite in the normalized edge distance.Comment: Corrections made based on the referee's comment

    Groups of given intermediate word growth

    Get PDF
    We show that there exists a finitely generated group of growth ~f for all functions f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R} satisfying f(2R) \leq f(R)^{2} \leq f(\eta R) for all R large enough and \eta\approx2.4675 the positive root of X^{3}-X^{2}-2X-4. This covers all functions that grow uniformly faster than \exp(R^{\log2/\log\eta}). We also give a family of self-similar branched groups of growth ~\exp(R^\alpha) for a dense set of \alpha\in(\log2/\log\eta,1).Comment: small typos corrected from v

    Algorithms for group isomorphism via group extensions and cohomology

    Full text link
    The isomorphism problem for finite groups of order n (GpI) has long been known to be solvable in nlogn+O(1)n^{\log n+O(1)} time, but only recently were polynomial-time algorithms designed for several interesting group classes. Inspired by recent progress, we revisit the strategy for GpI via the extension theory of groups. The extension theory describes how a normal subgroup N is related to G/N via G, and this naturally leads to a divide-and-conquer strategy that splits GpI into two subproblems: one regarding group actions on other groups, and one regarding group cohomology. When the normal subgroup N is abelian, this strategy is well-known. Our first contribution is to extend this strategy to handle the case when N is not necessarily abelian. This allows us to provide a unified explanation of all recent polynomial-time algorithms for special group classes. Guided by this strategy, to make further progress on GpI, we consider central-radical groups, proposed in Babai et al. (SODA 2011): the class of groups such that G mod its center has no abelian normal subgroups. This class is a natural extension of the group class considered by Babai et al. (ICALP 2012), namely those groups with no abelian normal subgroups. Following the above strategy, we solve GpI in nO(loglogn)n^{O(\log \log n)} time for central-radical groups, and in polynomial time for several prominent subclasses of central-radical groups. We also solve GpI in nO(loglogn)n^{O(\log\log n)} time for groups whose solvable normal subgroups are elementary abelian but not necessarily central. As far as we are aware, this is the first time there have been worst-case guarantees on a no(logn)n^{o(\log n)}-time algorithm that tackles both aspects of GpI---actions and cohomology---simultaneously.Comment: 54 pages + 14-page appendix. Significantly improved presentation, with some new result
    corecore