Asynchronous networked MPC with ISM for uncertain nonlinear systems

A model-based event-triggered control scheme for nonlinear constrained continuous-time uncertain systems in networked configuration is presented in this paper. It is based on the combined use of Model Predictive Control (MPC) and Integral Sliding Mode (ISM) control, and it is oriented to reduce the packets transmission over the network both in the direct path and in the feedback path, in order to avoid network congestion. The key elements of the proposed control scheme are the ISM local control law, the MPC remote controller, a smart sensor and a smart actuator, both containing a copy of the nominal model of the plant. The role of the ISM control law is to compensate matched uncertainties, without amplifying the unmatched ones. The MPC controller with tightened constraints generates the control component oriented to comply with state and control requirements, and is asynchronous since the underlying constrained optimization problem is solved only when a triggering event occurs. In the paper, the robustness properties of the controlled system are theoretically analyzed, proving the regional input-tostate practical stability of the overall control scheme

Stability and implementation of model based predictive networked control system

Digital control systems that have computer nodes which communicate over a data loss and random delay prone common network are called Networked Control System (NCS). In a typical NCS, the sensor, controller and the actuator nodes reside in different computers and communicate with each other over a network. Random delays and data loss of the communication network can endanger the stability of the NCS and retransmission of data is not feasible in control applications since it adds delay to the system. The aim of this thesis is to verify that the distributed NCS method called Model Based Predictive Networked Control System (MBPNCS) can be implemented using an observer and that it can control an open loop unstable plant. MBPNCS compensates for missed and late data by implementing an intelligent predictive control scheme based on a model of the plant. MBPNCS does not use retransmission and does not guarantee timely delivery of data packets to each computer node since this solution is not feasible on every control application and every communication medium. Instead, MBPNCS offers a control solution that can work under random network delay and data loss by the use of a predictive architecture that predicts plant state estimates and respective control signals from actual plant states. In this thesis, MBPNCS is described along with an introduction to a theoretical stability criterion. This is followed by an implementation of MBPNCS with two different plants. First, MBPNCS is implemented with an observer based DC motor plant to demonstrate the system’s efficiency with an observer. Next, MBPNCS is implemented with an inverted pendulum to demonstrate the system’s efficiency with an open loop unstable plant. Finally, two separate MBPNCS’s are implemented over a common network to demonstrate the systems efficiency and feasibility in industrial applications. The results show that considerable improvement over performance is achieved with respect to an event based networked control system

A non-uniform predictor-observer for a networked control system

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12555-011-0621-5This paper presents a Non-Uniform Predictor-Observer (NUPO) based control approach in order to deal with two of the main problems related to Networked Control Systems (NCS) or Sensor Networks (SN): time-varying delays and packet loss. In addition, if these delays are longer than the sampling period, the packet disordering phenomenon can appear. Due to these issues, a (scarce) nonuniform, delayed measurement signal could be received by the controller. But including the NUPO proposal in the control system, the delay will be compensated by the prediction stage, and the nonavailable data will be reconstructed by the observer stage. So, a delay-free, uniformly sampled controller design can be adopted. To ensure stability, the predictor must satisfy a feasibility problem based on a time-varying delay-dependent condition expressed in terms of Linear Matrix Inequalities (LMI). Some aspects like the relation between network delay and robustness/performance trade-off are empirically studied. A simulation example shows the benefits (robustness and control performance improvement) of the NUPO approach by comparison to another similar proposal. © ICROS, KIEE and Springer 2011.This work was supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia Projects DPI2008-06737-C02-01 and DPI2009-14744-C03-03, by Generalitat Valenciana Project GV/2010/018, by Universidad Politecnica de Valencia Project PAID06-08.Cuenca Lacruz, ÁM.; García Gil, PJ.; Albertos Pérez, P.; Salt Llobregat, JJ. (2011). A non-uniform predictor-observer for a networked control system. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems. 9(6):1194-1202. doi:10.1007/s12555-011-0621-5S1194120296K. Ogata, Discrete-time Control Systems, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1987.Y. Tipsuwan and M. Chow, “Control methodologies in networked control systems,” Control Eng. Practice, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1099–1111, 2003.T. Jia, Y. Niu, and X. Wang, “H ∞ control for networked systems with data packet dropout,” Int. J. Control, Autom., and Syst., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 198–203, 2010.Y. Wang and G. Yang, “Robust H ∞ model reference tracking control for networked control systems with communication constraints,” Int. J. Control, Autom., and Syst., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 992–1000, 2009.H. Gao and T. Chen, “Network-based H ∞ output tracking control,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 655–667, 2008.H. Karimi, “Robust H ∞ filter design for uncertain linear systems over network with network-induced delays and output quantization,” Modeling, Identification and Control, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 27–37, 2009.H. R. Karimi, “Delay-range-dependent linear matrix inequality approach to quantized H ∞ control of linear systems with network-induced delays and norm-bounded uncertainties,” Proc. of the Inst. of Mech. Eng., Part I: J. of Syst. and Control Eng., vol. 224, no. 6, pp. 689–700, 2010.K. Lee, S. Lee, and M. Lee, “Remote fuzzy logic control of networked control system via Profibus-DP,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 784–792, 2003.Y. Tipsuwan and M.-Y. Chow, “Gain scheduler middleware: a methodology to enable existing controllers for networked control and teleoperationpart I: networked Control,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1218–1227, December 2004.A. Sala, A. Cuenca, and J. Salt, “A retunable PID multi-rate controller for a networked control system,” Inform. Sci., vol. 179, no. 14, pp. 2390–2402, June 2009.A. Cuenca, J. Salt, V. Casanova, and R. Piza, “An approach based on an adaptive multi-rate Smith predictor and gain scheduling for a networked control system: implementation over Profibus-DP,” Int. J. Control, Autom., and Syst., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 473–481, April 2010.A. Cuenca, J. Salt, A. Sala, and R. Piza, “A delay-dependent dual-rate PID controller over an Ethernet network,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 18–29, Feb. 2011.Y. Tian and D. Levy, “Compensation for control packet dropout in networked control systems,” Inform. Sci., vol. 178, no. 5, pp. 1263–1278, 2008.Y. Zhao, G. Liu, and D. Rees, “Modeling and stabilization of continuous-time packet-based networked control systems.” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. B, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1646–1652, Dec. 2009.X. Zhao, S. Fei, and C. Sun, “Impulsive controller design for singular networked control systems with packet dropouts,” Int. J. Control, Autom., and Syst., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1020–1025, 2009.H. Gao and T. Chen, “H ∞ estimation for uncertain systems with limited communication capacity,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 2070–2084, 2007.S. Oh, L. Schenato, P. Chen, and S. Sastry, “Tracking and coordination of multiple agents using sensor networks: System design, algorithms and experiments,” Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 234–254, 2007.M. Moayedi, Y. Foo, and Y. Soh, “Optimal and suboptimal minimum-variance filtering in networked systems with mixed uncertainties of random sensor delays, packet dropouts and missing measurements,” Int. J. Control, Autom., and Syst., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1179–1188, 2010.W. Zhang, M. Branicky, and S. Phillips, “Stability of networked control systems,” IEEE Control Syst. Mag., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 84–99, 2001.J. Hespanha, P. Naghshtabrizi, and Y. Xu, “A survey of recent results in networked control systems,” Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 138–162, 2007.J. Baillieul and P. Antsaklis, “Control and communication challenges in networked real-time systems,” Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 9–28, 2007.P. Garcia, P. Castillo, R. Lozano, and P. Albertos, “Robustness with respect to delay uncertainties of a predictor-observer based discrete-time controller,” Proc. of the 45th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, pp. 199–204, 2006.C. Lien, “Robust observer-based control of systems with state perturbations via LMI approach,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 1365–1370, 2004.A. Sala, “Computer control under time-varying sampling period: an LMI gridding approach,” Automatica, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 2077–2082, Dec. 2005.J. Li, Q. Zhang, Y. Wang, and M. Cai, “H ∞ control of networked control systems with packet disordering,” IET Control Theory Appl., vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 1463–1475, March 2009.Y. Zhao, G. Liu, and D. Rees, “Improved predictive control approach to networked control systems,” IET Control Theory Appl., vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 675–681, Aug. 2008.K. Astrom, “Event based control,” Analysis and Design of Nonlinear Control Systems, pp. 127–147, 2007.A. Cuenca, P. García, K. Arzén, and P. Albertos, “A predictor-observer for a networked control system with time-varying delays and non-uniform sampling,” Proc. Eur. Control Conf., pp. 946–951, 2009.J. Xiong and J. Lam, “Stabilization of linear systems over networks with bounded packet loss,” Automatica, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 80–87, 2007.H. Song, L. Yu, and A. Liu, “H ∞ filtering for network-based systems with communication constraints and packet dropouts,” Proc. of the 7th Asian Control Conf., pp. 220–225, 2009.P. Garcia, A. Gonzalez, P. Castillo, R. Lozano, and P. Albertos, “Robustness of a discrete-time predictor-based controller for time-varying measurement delay,” Proc. of the 9th IFAC Workshop on Time Delay Systems, 2010.J. Sturm, “Using SeDuMi 1.02, a MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones,” Optimization methods and software, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 625–653, 1999.T. Henningsson and K. Astrom, “Log-concave observers,” Proc. of the 17th Int. Symp. on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems, pp. 2163–2170, 2006.D. Davison and E. Hwang, “Automating radiotherapy cancer treatment: use of multirate observer-based control,” Proc. of American Control Conf., vol. 2, pp. 1194–1199, 2003

Dynamics analysis and integrated design of real-time control systems

Real-time control systems are widely deployed in many applications. Theory and practice for the design and deployment of real-time control systems have evolved significantly. From the design perspective, control strategy development has been the focus of the research in the control community. In order to develop good control strategies, process modelling and analysis have been investigated for decades, and stability analysis and model-based control have been heavily studied in the literature. From the implementation perspective, real-time control systems require timeliness and predictable timing behaviour in addition to logical correctness, and a real-time control system may behave very differently with different software implementations of the control strategies on a digital controller, which typically has limited computing resources. Most current research activities on software implementations concentrate on various scheduling methodologies to ensure the schedulability of multiple control tasks in constrained environments. Recently, more and more real-time control systems are implemented over data networks, leading to increasing interest worldwide in the design and implementation of networked control systems (NCS). Major research activities in NCS include control-oriented and scheduling-oriented investigations. In spite of significant progress in the research and development of real-time control systems, major difficulties exist in the state of the art. A key issue is the lack of integrated design for control development and its software implementation. For control design, the model-based control technique, the current focus of control research, does not work when a good process model is not available or is too complicated for control design. For control implementation on digital controllers running multiple tasks, the system schedulability is essential but is not enough; the ultimate objective of satisfactory quality-of-control (QoC) performance has not been addressed directly. For networked control, the majority of the control-oriented investigations are based on two unrealistic assumptions about the network induced delay. The scheduling-oriented research focuses on schedulability and does not directly link to the overall QoC of the system. General solutions with direct QoC consideration from the network perspective to the challenging problems of network delay and packet dropout in NCS have not been found in the literature. This thesis addresses the design and implementation of real-time control systems with regard to dynamics analysis and integrated design. Three related areas have been investigated, namely control development for controllers, control implementation and scheduling on controllers, and real-time control in networked environments. Seven research problems are identified from these areas for investigation in this thesis, and accordingly seven major contributions have been claimed. Timing behaviour, quality of control, and integrated design for real-time control systems are highlighted throughout this thesis. In control design, a model-free control technique, pattern predictive control, is developed for complex reactive distillation processes. Alleviating the requirement of accurate process models, the developed control technique integrates pattern recognition, fuzzy logic, non-linear transformation, and predictive control into a unified framework to solve complex problems. Characterising the QoC indirectly with control latency and jitter, scheduling strategies for multiple control tasks are proposed to minimise the latency and/or jitter. Also, a hierarchical, QoC driven, and event-triggering feedback scheduling architecture is developed with plug-ins of either the earliest-deadline-first or fixed priority scheduling. Linking to the QoC directly, the architecture minimises the use of computing resources without sacrifice of the system QoC. It considers the control requirements, but does not rely on the control design. For real-time NCS, the dynamics of the network delay are analysed first, and the nonuniform distribution and multi-fractal nature of the delay are revealed. These results do not support two fundamental assumptions used in existing NCS literature. Then, considering the control requirements, solutions are provided to the challenging NCS problems from the network perspective. To compensate for the network delay, a real-time queuing protocol is developed to smooth out the time-varying delay and thus to achieve more predictable behaviour of packet transmissions. For control packet dropout, simple yet effective compensators are proposed. Finally, combining the queuing protocol, the packet loss compensation, the configuration of the worst-case communication delay, and the control design, an integrated design framework is developed for real-time NCS. With this framework, the network delay is limited to within a single control period, leading to simplified system analysis and improved QoC

Flexible Scheduling Methods and Tools for Real-Time Control Systems

This thesis deals with flexibility in the design of real-time control systems. By dynamic resource scheduling it is possible to achieve on-line adaptability and increased control performance under resource constraints. The approach requires simulation tools for control and real-time systems co-design. One approach to achieve flexibility in the run-time scheduling of control tasks is feedback scheduling, where resources are scheduled dynamically based on measurements of actual timing variations and control performance. An overview of feedback scheduling techniques for control systems is presented.A flexible strategy for implementation of model predictive control (MPC) is described. In MPC, the control signal in each sample is obtained by the solution of a constrained quadratic optimization problem. A termination criterion is derived that, unlike traditional MPC, takes the effects of computational delay into account in the optimization. A scheduling scheme is also described, where the MPC cost functions being minimized are used as dynamic task priorities for a set of MPC tasks. The MATLAB/Simulink-based simulator TrueTime is presented. TrueTime is a co-design tool that facilitates simulation of distributed real-time control systems, where the execution of controller tasks in a real-time kernel is simulated in parallel with network transmissions and the continuous-time plant dynamics. Using TrueTime it is possible to study the effects of CPU and network scheduling on control performance and to experiment with flexible scheduling techniques and compensation schemes. A general overview of the simulator is given and the event-based kernel implementation is described.TrueTime is used in two simulation case studies. The first emulates TCP on top of standard Ethernet to simulate networked control of a robot system. The second case study uses TrueTime to simulate a web server application. A feedback scheduling strategy for QoS control in the web server is described

Optimal Control for Aperiodic Dual-Rate Systems With Time-Varying Delays

[EN] In this work, we consider a dual-rate scenario with slow input and fast output. Our objective is the maximization of the decay rate of the system through the suitable choice of the n-input signals between two measures (periodic sampling) and their times of application. The optimization algorithm is extended for time-varying delays in order to make possible its implementation in networked control systems. We provide experimental results in an air levitation system to verify the validity of the algorithm in a real plant.This work was supported in part by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) under the Projects DPI2012-31303 and DPI2014-55932-C2-2-R.Aranda-Escolástico, E.; Salt Llobregat, JJ.; Guinaldo, M.; Chacon, J.; Dormido, S. (2018). Optimal Control for Aperiodic Dual-Rate Systems With Time-Varying Delays. Sensors. 18(5):1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051491S119185Mansano, R., Godoy, E., & Porto, A. (2014). The Benefits of Soft Sensor and Multi-Rate Control for the Implementation of Wireless Networked Control Systems. Sensors, 14(12), 24441-24461. doi:10.3390/s141224441Shao, Q. M., & Cinar, A. (2015). System identification and distributed control for multi-rate sampled systems. Journal of Process Control, 34, 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2015.06.010Albertos, P., & Salt, J. (2011). Non-uniform sampled-data control of MIMO systems. Annual Reviews in Control, 35(1), 65-76. doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2011.03.004Cuenca, A., & Salt, J. (2012). RST controller design for a non-uniform multi-rate control system. Journal of Process Control, 22(10), 1865-1877. doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2012.09.010Cuenca, Á., Ojha, U., Salt, J., & Chow, M.-Y. (2015). A non-uniform multi-rate control strategy for a Markov chain-driven Networked Control System. Information Sciences, 321, 31-47. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2015.05.035Kalman, R. E., & Bertram, J. E. (1959). General synthesis procedure for computer control of single-loop and multiloop linear systems (an optimal sampling system). Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, Part II: Applications and Industry, 77(6), 602-609. doi:10.1109/tai.1959.6371508Khargonekar, P., Poolla, K., & Tannenbaum, A. (1985). Robust control of linear time-invariant plants using periodic compensation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 30(11), 1088-1096. doi:10.1109/tac.1985.1103841Bamieh, B., Pearson, J. B., Francis, B. A., & Tannenbaum, A. (1991). A lifting technique for linear periodic systems with applications to sampled-data control. Systems & Control Letters, 17(2), 79-88. doi:10.1016/0167-6911(91)90033-bLi, D., Shah, S. L., Chen, T., & Qi, K. Z. (2001). Application of dual-rate modeling to CCR octane quality inferential control. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 34(25), 353-357. doi:10.1016/s1474-6670(17)33849-1Salt, J., & Albertos, P. (2005). Model-based multirate controllers design. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 13(6), 988-997. doi:10.1109/tcst.2005.857410Nemani, M., Tsao, T.-C., & Hutchinson, S. (1994). Multi-Rate Analysis and Design of Visual Feedback Digital Servo-Control System. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 116(1), 45-55. doi:10.1115/1.2900680Sim, T. P., Lim, K. B., & Hong, G. S. (2002). Multirate predictor control scheme for visual servo control. IEE Proceedings - Control Theory and Applications, 149(2), 117-124. doi:10.1049/ip-cta:20020238Xinghui Huang, Nagamune, R., & Horowitz, R. (2006). A comparison of multirate robust track-following control synthesis techniques for dual-stage and multisensing servo systems in hard disk drives. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 42(7), 1896-1904. doi:10.1109/tmag.2006.875353Wu, Y., Liu, Y., & Zhang, W. (2013). A Discrete-Time Chattering Free Sliding Mode Control with Multirate Sampling Method for Flight Simulator. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013, 1-8. doi:10.1155/2013/865493Salt, J., & Tomizuka, M. (2014). Hard disk drive control by model based dual-rate controller. Computation saving by interlacing. Mechatronics, 24(6), 691-700. doi:10.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.12.003Salt, J., Casanova, V., Cuenca, A., & Pizá, R. (2013). Multirate control with incomplete information over Profibus-DP network. International Journal of Systems Science, 45(7), 1589-1605. doi:10.1080/00207721.2013.844286Liu, F., Gao, H., Qiu, J., Yin, S., Fan, J., & Chai, T. (2014). Networked Multirate Output Feedback Control for Setpoints Compensation and Its Application to Rougher Flotation Process. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 61(1), 460-468. doi:10.1109/tie.2013.2240640Khargonekar, P. P., & Sivashankar, N. (1991). 2 optimal control for sampled-data systems. Systems & Control Letters, 17(6), 425-436. doi:10.1016/0167-6911(91)90082-pTornero, J., Albertos, P., & Salt, J. (2001). Periodic Optimal Control of Multirate Sampled Data Systems. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 34(12), 195-200. doi:10.1016/s1474-6670(17)34084-3Kim, C. H., Park, H. J., Lee, J., Lee, H. W., & Lee, K. D. (2015). Multi-rate optimal controller design for electromagnetic suspension systems via linear matrix inequality optimization. Journal of Applied Physics, 117(17), 17B506. doi:10.1063/1.4906588LEE, J. H., GELORMINO, M. S., & MORARIH, M. (1992). Model predictive control of multi-rate sampled-data systems: a state-space approach. International Journal of Control, 55(1), 153-191. doi:10.1080/00207179208934231Mizumoto, I., Ikejiri, M., & Takagi, T. (2015). Stable Adaptive Predictive Control System Design via Adaptive Output Predictor for Multi-rate Sampled Systems∗∗This work was partially supported by KAKENHI, the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 25420444, from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(8), 1039-1044. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.09.105Carpiuc, S., & Lazar, C. (2016). Real-Time Multi-Rate Predictive Cascade Speed Control of Synchronous Machines in Automotive Electrical Traction Drives. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 1-1. doi:10.1109/tie.2016.2561881Roshany-Yamchi, S., Cychowski, M., Negenborn, R. R., De Schutter, B., Delaney, K., & Connell, J. (2013). Kalman Filter-Based Distributed Predictive Control of Large-Scale Multi-Rate Systems: Application to Power Networks. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 21(1), 27-39. doi:10.1109/tcst.2011.2172444Donkers, M. C. F., Tabuada, P., & Heemels, W. P. M. H. (2012). Minimum attention control for linear systems. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, 24(2), 199-218. doi:10.1007/s10626-012-0155-xQuevedo, D. E., Ma, W.-J., & Gupta, V. (2015). Anytime Control Using Input Sequences With Markovian Processor Availability. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 60(2), 515-521. doi:10.1109/tac.2014.2335311Aranda Escolastico, E., Guinaldo, M., Cuenca, A., Salt, J., & Dormido, S. (2017). Anytime Optimal Control Strategy for Multi-Rate Systems. IEEE Access, 5, 2790-2797. doi:10.1109/access.2017.2671906Guinaldo, M., Sánchez, J., & Dormido, S. (2017). Control en red basado en eventos: de lo centralizado a lo distribuido. Revista Iberoamericana de Automática e Informática Industrial RIAI, 14(1), 16-30. doi:10.1016/j.riai.2016.09.007Van Loan, C. (1977). The Sensitivity of the Matrix Exponential. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 14(6), 971-981. doi:10.1137/0714065Hazan, E. (2016). Introduction to Online Convex Optimization. Foundations and Trends® in Optimization, 2(3-4), 157-325. doi:10.1561/2400000013Sala, A., Cuenca, Á., & Salt, J. (2009). A retunable PID multi-rate controller for a networked control system. Information Sciences, 179(14), 2390-2402. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2009.02.017Chacon, J., Saenz, J., Torre, L., Diaz, J., & Esquembre, F. (2017). Design of a Low-Cost Air Levitation System for Teaching Control Engineering. Sensors, 17(10), 2321. doi:10.3390/s1710232

Event-triggered and distributed model predictive control for guaranteed collision avoidance in UAV swarms

Distributed model predictive control (DMPC) is often used to tackle path planning for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarms. However, it requires considerable computations on-board the UAV, leading to increased weight and power consumption. In this work, we propose to offload path planning computations to multiple ground-based computation units. As simultaneously communicating and recomputing all trajectories is not feasible for a large swarm with tight timing requirements, we develop a novel event-triggered DMPC that selects a subset of most relevant UAV trajectories to be replanned. The resulting architecture reduces UAV weight and power consumption, while the active redundancy provides robustness against computation unit failures. Moreover, the DMPC guarantees feasible and collision-free trajectories for UAVs with linear dynamics. In simulations, we demonstrate that our method can reliably plan trajectories, while saving 60% of network traffic and required computational power. Hardware-in-the-loop experiments show that it is suitable to control real quadcopter swarms.Comment: Accepted for publication at the IFAC Conference on Networked Systems (NecSys) 202