25,200 research outputs found
MEDIA EFFECTS ON THE NEW YORK TIMES’ “THE WOMEN’S MARCH IN WASHINGTON” VIDEO NEWS COVERAGE ON FACEBOOK
The reliance towards Facebook in regard to obtaining information becomes a news habit among the society. Considerable number of news coverage from media is accessible to Facebook which creates effects on the audience on account of the media exposure. The study is conducted for the purposes of analyzing news elements which are embedded in The New York Times' “The Women's March in Wahsington”video news coverage on Facebook and discovering the effects of the coverage towards media audience. This study is constructed as a library research which utilizes textual and user-response analysis research methodology. The theory utilizes to support the study is Pan &Kosicki's Framing Analysis, and McComb& Shaw's Agenda-Setting theory is also applied in this study to support the framing analysis. The results of the study indicate that three salient elements of the coverage set public agenda to which the salient elements become prominent issues of the Women's March on Washington
Trump, Twitter, and news media responsiveness: a media systems approach
How populists engage with media of various types, and are treated by those media, are questions of international interest. In the United States, Donald Trump stands out for both his populism-inflected campaign style and his success at attracting media attention. This article examines how interactions between candidate communications, social media, partisan media, and news media combined to shape attention to Trump, Clinton, Cruz, and Sanders during the 2015–2016 American presidential primary elections. We identify six major components of the American media system and measure candidates’ efforts to gain attention from them. Our results demonstrate that social media activity, in the form of retweets of candidate posts, provided a significant boost to news media coverage of Trump, but no comparable boost for other candidates. Furthermore, Trump tweeted more at times when he had recently garnered less of a relative advantage in news attention, suggesting he strategically used Twitter to trigger coverage.Accepted manuscrip
A Quantitative Approach to Understanding Online Antisemitism
A new wave of growing antisemitism, driven by fringe Web communities, is an
increasingly worrying presence in the socio-political realm. The ubiquitous and
global nature of the Web has provided tools used by these groups to spread
their ideology to the rest of the Internet. Although the study of antisemitism
and hate is not new, the scale and rate of change of online data has impacted
the efficacy of traditional approaches to measure and understand these
troubling trends. In this paper, we present a large-scale, quantitative study
of online antisemitism. We collect hundreds of million posts and images from
alt-right Web communities like 4chan's Politically Incorrect board (/pol/) and
Gab. Using scientifically grounded methods, we quantify the escalation and
spread of antisemitic memes and rhetoric across the Web. We find the frequency
of antisemitic content greatly increases (in some cases more than doubling)
after major political events such as the 2016 US Presidential Election and the
"Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville. We extract semantic embeddings from
our corpus of posts and demonstrate how automated techniques can discover and
categorize the use of antisemitic terminology. We additionally examine the
prevalence and spread of the antisemitic "Happy Merchant" meme, and in
particular how these fringe communities influence its propagation to more
mainstream communities like Twitter and Reddit. Taken together, our results
provide a data-driven, quantitative framework for understanding online
antisemitism. Our methods serve as a framework to augment current qualitative
efforts by anti-hate groups, providing new insights into the growth and spread
of hate online.Comment: To appear at the 14th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social
Media (ICWSM 2020). Please cite accordingl
Debiasing Community Detection: The Importance of Lowly-Connected Nodes
Community detection is an important task in social network analysis, allowing
us to identify and understand the communities within the social structures.
However, many community detection approaches either fail to assign low degree
(or lowly-connected) users to communities, or assign them to trivially small
communities that prevent them from being included in analysis. In this work, we
investigate how excluding these users can bias analysis results. We then
introduce an approach that is more inclusive for lowly-connected users by
incorporating them into larger groups. Experiments show that our approach
outperforms the existing state-of-the-art in terms of F1 and Jaccard similarity
scores while reducing the bias towards low-degree users
- …