1,008 research outputs found

    Attenuation correction for brain PET imaging using deep neural network based on dixon and ZTE MR images

    Full text link
    Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a functional imaging modality widely used in neuroscience studies. To obtain meaningful quantitative results from PET images, attenuation correction is necessary during image reconstruction. For PET/MR hybrid systems, PET attenuation is challenging as Magnetic Resonance (MR) images do not reflect attenuation coefficients directly. To address this issue, we present deep neural network methods to derive the continuous attenuation coefficients for brain PET imaging from MR images. With only Dixon MR images as the network input, the existing U-net structure was adopted and analysis using forty patient data sets shows it is superior than other Dixon based methods. When both Dixon and zero echo time (ZTE) images are available, we have proposed a modified U-net structure, named GroupU-net, to efficiently make use of both Dixon and ZTE information through group convolution modules when the network goes deeper. Quantitative analysis based on fourteen real patient data sets demonstrates that both network approaches can perform better than the standard methods, and the proposed network structure can further reduce the PET quantification error compared to the U-net structure.Comment: 15 pages, 12 figure

    Deep Boosted Regression for MR to CT Synthesis

    Get PDF
    Attenuation correction is an essential requirement of positron emission tomography (PET) image reconstruction to allow for accurate quantification. However, attenuation correction is particularly challenging for PET-MRI as neither PET nor magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can directly image tissue attenuation properties. MRI-based computed tomography (CT) synthesis has been proposed as an alternative to physics based and segmentation-based approaches that assign a population-based tissue density value in order to generate an attenuation map. We propose a novel deep fully convolutional neural network that generates synthetic CTs in a recursive manner by gradually reducing the residuals of the previous network, increasing the overall accuracy and generalisability, while keeping the number of trainable parameters within reasonable limits. The model is trained on a database of 20 pre-acquired MRI/CT pairs and a four-fold random bootstrapped validation with a 80:20 split is performed. Quantitative results show that the proposed framework outperforms a state-of-the-art atlas-based approach decreasing the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) from 131HU to 68HU for the synthetic CTs and reducing the PET reconstruction error from 14.3% to 7.2%.Comment: Accepted at SASHIMI201

    MR-based attenuation correction and scatter correction in neurological PET/MR imaging with 18F-FDG

    Get PDF
    The aim was to investigate the effects of MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC) and scatter correction to positron emission tomography (PET) image quantification in neurological PET/MR with 18F-FDG. A multi-center phantom study was conducted to investigate the effect of MRAC between PET/MR and PET/CT systems (I). An MRAC method to derive bone from T1-weighted MR images was developed (II, III). Finally, scatter correction accuracy with MRAC was investigated (IV). The results show that the quantitative accuracy in PET is well-comparable be-tween PET/MR and PET/CT systems when an attenuation correction method resembling CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC) is implemented. This al-lows achieving of a PET bias within standard uptake value (SUV) quantification repeatability (< 10 % error) and is within the repeatability of PET in most sys-tems and brain regions (< 5 % error). In addition, MRAC considering soft tissue, air and bone can be derived using T1-weighted images alone. The improved version of the MRAC method allows achieving a quantitative accuracy feasible for advanced applications (< 5 % error). MRAC has a minor effect on the scatter correction accuracy (< 3 % error), even when using MRAC without bone. In conclusion, MRAC can be considered the largest contributing factor to PET quantification bias in 18F-FDG neurological PET/MR. This finding is not explicitly limited only to 18F-FDG imaging. Once an MRAC method that performs close to CTAC is implemented, there is no reason why a PET/MR system would perform differently from a PET/CT system. Such an MRAC method has been developed and is freely available (http://bit.ly/2fx6Jjz). Scatter correction can be considered a non-issue in neurological PET/MR imaging when using 18F-FD

    Deep MR to CT Synthesis for PET/MR Attenuation Correction

    Get PDF
    Positron Emission Tomography - Magnetic Resonance (PET/MR) imaging combines the functional information from PET with the flexibility of MR imaging. It is essential, however, to correct for photon attenuation when reconstructing PETs, which is challenging for PET/MR as neither modality directly image tissue attenuation properties. Classical MR-based computed tomography (CT) synthesis methods, such as multi-atlas propagation, have been the method of choice for PET attenuation correction (AC), however, these methods are slow and suffer from the poor ability to handle anatomical abnormalities. To overcome this limitation, this thesis explores the rising field of artificial intelligence in order to develop novel methods for PET/MR AC. Deep learning-based synthesis methods such as the standard U-Net architecture are not very stable, accurate, and robust to small variations in image appearance. Thus, the first proposed MR to CT synthesis method deploys a boosting strategy, where multiple weak predictors build a strong predictor providing a significant improvement in CT and PET reconstruction accuracy. Standard deep learning-based methods as well as more advanced methods like the first proposed method show issues in the presence of very complex imaging environments and large images such as whole-body images. The second proposed method learns the image context between whole-body MRs and CTs through multiple resolutions while simultaneously modelling uncertainty. Lastly, as the purpose of synthesizing a CT is to better reconstruct PET data, the use of CT-based loss functions is questioned within this thesis. Such losses fail to recognize the main objective of MR-based AC, which is to generate a synthetic CT that, when used for PET AC, makes the reconstructed PET as close as possible to the gold standard PET. The third proposed method introduces a novel PET-based loss that minimizes CT residuals with respect to the PET reconstruction

    Potentials and caveats of AI in Hybrid Imaging

    Get PDF
    State-of-the-art patient management frequently mandates the investigation of both anatomy and physiology of the patients. Hybrid imaging modalities such as the PET/MRI, PET/CT and SPECT/CT have the ability to provide both structural and functional information of the investigated tissues in a single examination. With the introduction of such advanced hardware fusion, new problems arise such as the exceedingly large amount of multi-modality data that requires novel approaches of how to extract a maximum of clinical information from large sets of multi-dimensional imaging data. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as one of the leading technologies that has shown promise in facilitating highly integrative analysis of multi-parametric data. Specifically, the usefulness of AI algorithms in the medical imaging field has been heavily investigated in the realms of (1) image acquisition and reconstruction, (2) post-processing and (3) data mining and modelling. Here, we aim to provide an overview of the challenges encountered in hybrid imaging and discuss how AI algorithms can facilitate potential solutions. In addition, we highlight the pitfalls and challenges in using advanced AI algorithms in the context of hybrid imaging and provide suggestions for building robust AI solutions that enable reproducible and transparent research

    An Investigation of Methods for CT Synthesis in MR-only Radiotherapy

    Get PDF

    PET/MRI ๋ฐ MR-IGRT๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ MRI ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ CT ์ƒ์„ฑ์˜ ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์˜๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์˜๊ณผํ•™๊ณผ, 2020. 8. ์ด์žฌ์„ฑ.Over the past decade, the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the field of diagnosis and treatment has increased. MRI provides higher soft-tissue contrast, especially in the brain, abdominal organ, and bone marrow without the expose of ionizing radiation. Hence, simultaneous positron emission tomography/MR (PET/MR) system and MR-image guided radiation therapy (MR-IGRT) system has recently been emerged and currently available for clinical study. One major issue in PET/MR system is attenuation correction from MRI scans for PET quantification and a similar need for the assignment of electron densities to MRI scans for dose calculation can be found in MR-IGRT system. Because the MR signals are related to the proton density and relaxation properties of tissue, not to electron density. To overcome this problem, the method called synthetic CT (sCT), a pseudo CT derived from MR images, has been proposed. In this thesis, studies on generating synthetic CT and investigating the feasibility of using a MR-based synthetic CT for diagnostic and radiotherapy application were presented. Firstly, MR image-based attenuation correction (MR-AC) method using level-set segmentation for brain PET/MRI was developed. To resolve conventional inaccuracy MR-AC problem, we proposed an improved ultrashort echo time MR-AC method that was based on a multiphase level-set algorithm with main magnetic field inhomogeneity correction. We also assessed the feasibility of level-set based MR-AC method, compared with CT-AC and MR-AC provided by the manufacturer of the PET/MRI scanner. Secondly, we proposed sCT generation from the low field MR images using 2D convolution neural network model for MR-IGRT system. This sCT images were compared to the deformed CT generated using the deformable registration being used in the current system. We assessed the feasibility of using sCT for radiation treatment planning from each of the patients with pelvic, thoraic and abdominal region through geometric and dosimetric evaluation.์ง€๋‚œ 10๋…„๊ฐ„ ์ง„๋‹จ ๋ฐ ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์ž๊ธฐ๊ณต๋ช…์˜์ƒ(Magnetic resonance imaging; MRI) ์˜ ์ ์šฉ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. MRI๋Š” CT์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•ด ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ์ „๋ฆฌ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ์˜ ํ”ผํญ์—†์ด ๋‡Œ, ๋ณต๋ถ€ ๊ธฐ๊ด€ ๋ฐ ๊ณจ์ˆ˜ ๋“ฑ์—์„œ ๋” ๋†’์€ ์—ฐ์กฐ์ง ๋Œ€๋น„๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ MRI๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•œ ์–‘์ „์ž๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋‹จ์ธต์ดฌ์˜(Positron emission tomography; PET)/MR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๊ณผ MR ์˜์ƒ ์œ ๋„ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„  ์น˜๋ฃŒ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ(MR-image guided radiation therapy; MR-IGRT)์ด ์ง„๋‹จ ๋ฐ ์น˜๋ฃŒ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ๋ถ„์•ผ์— ๋“ฑ์žฅํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž„์ƒ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. PET/MR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” PET ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ MRI ์Šค์บ”์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ์˜ ๊ฐ์‡  ๋ณด์ •์ด๋ฉฐ, MR-IGRT ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ ์„ ๋Ÿ‰ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด MR ์˜์ƒ์— ์ „์ž ๋ฐ€๋„๋ฅผ ํ• ๋‹นํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ํ•„์š”์„ฑ์„ ์ฐพ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” MR ์‹ ํ˜ธ๊ฐ€ ์ „์ž ๋ฐ€๋„๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹Œ ์กฐ์ง์˜ ์–‘์„ฑ์ž ๋ฐ€๋„ ๋ฐ T1, T2 ์ด์™„ ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, MR ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์œ ๋ž˜๋œ ๊ฐ€์ƒ์˜ CT์ธ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ CT๋ผ ๋ถˆ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ์ œ์•ˆ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ•ฉ์„ฑ CT ์ƒ์„ฑ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ๋ฐ ์ง„๋‹จ ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„  ์น˜๋ฃŒ์— ์ ์šฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ MR ์˜์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ CT ์‚ฌ์šฉ์˜ ์ž„์ƒ์  ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ๋กœ, ๋‡Œ PET/MR๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ ˆ๋ฒจ์…‹ ๋ถ„ํ• ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ MR ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ฐ์‡  ๋ณด์ • ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. MR ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ฐ์‡  ๋ณด์ •์˜ ๋ถ€์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์€ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™” ์˜ค๋ฅ˜์™€ ๋‡Œ PET/MRI ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋ณ‘๋ณ€์˜ ์ž˜๋ชป๋œ ํŒ๋…์œผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์ง„๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์ž๊ธฐ์žฅ ๋ถˆ๊ท ์ผ ๋ณด์ •์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ๋‹ค์ƒ ๋ ˆ๋ฒจ์…‹ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์— ๊ธฐ์ดˆํ•œ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋œ ์ดˆ๋‹จํŒŒ ์—์ฝ” ์‹œ๊ฐ„ MR-AC ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ CT-AC ๋ฐ PET/MRI ์Šค์บ๋„ˆ ์ œ์กฐ์—…์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ MR-AC์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ ˆ๋ฒจ์…‹ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ MR-AC ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ์ž„์ƒ์  ์‚ฌ์šฉ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ๋กœ, MR-IGRT ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‹ฌ์ธต ์ปจ๋ณผ๋ฃจ์…˜ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ €ํ•„๋“œ MR ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์—์„œ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ CT ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ํ•ฉ์„ฑ CT ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋ฅผ ๋ณ€ํ˜• ์ •ํ•ฉ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ๋ณ€ํ˜• CT์™€ ๋น„๊ต ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ณจ๋ฐ˜, ํ‰๋ถ€ ๋ฐ ๋ณต๋ถ€ ํ™˜์ž์—์„œ์˜ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์ , ์„ ๋Ÿ‰์  ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„  ์น˜๋ฃŒ๊ณ„ํš์—์„œ์˜ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ CT๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Background 1 1.1.1. The Integration of MRI into Other Medical Devices 1 1.1.2. Chanllenges in the MRI Integrated System 4 1.1.3. Synthetic CT Generation 5 1.2. Purpose of Research 6 Chapter 2. MRI-based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI 8 2.1. Background 8 2.2. Materials and Methods 10 2.2.1. Brain PET Dataset 19 2.2.2. MR-Based Attenuation Map using Level-Set Algorithm 12 2.2.3. Image Processing and Reconstruction 18 2.3. Results 20 2.4. Discussion 28 Chapter 3. MRI-based synthetic CT generation for MR-IGRT 30 3.1. Background 30 3.2. Materials and Methods 32 3.2.1. MR-dCT Paired DataSet 32 3.2.2. Synthetic CT Generation using 2D CNN 36 3.2.3. Data Analysis 38 3.3. Results 41 3.3.1. Image Comparison 41 3.3.2. Geometric Analysis 49 3.3.3. Dosimetric Analysis 49 3.4. Discussion 56 Chapter 4. Conclusions 59 Bibliography 60 Abstract in Korean (๊ตญ๋ฌธ ์ดˆ๋ก) 64Docto
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore