16,276 research outputs found
Machine Learning and Integrative Analysis of Biomedical Big Data.
Recent developments in high-throughput technologies have accelerated the accumulation of massive amounts of omics data from multiple sources: genome, epigenome, transcriptome, proteome, metabolome, etc. Traditionally, data from each source (e.g., genome) is analyzed in isolation using statistical and machine learning (ML) methods. Integrative analysis of multi-omics and clinical data is key to new biomedical discoveries and advancements in precision medicine. However, data integration poses new computational challenges as well as exacerbates the ones associated with single-omics studies. Specialized computational approaches are required to effectively and efficiently perform integrative analysis of biomedical data acquired from diverse modalities. In this review, we discuss state-of-the-art ML-based approaches for tackling five specific computational challenges associated with integrative analysis: curse of dimensionality, data heterogeneity, missing data, class imbalance and scalability issues
Alignment-free Genomic Analysis via a Big Data Spark Platform
Motivation: Alignment-free distance and similarity functions (AF functions,
for short) are a well established alternative to two and multiple sequence
alignments for many genomic, metagenomic and epigenomic tasks. Due to
data-intensive applications, the computation of AF functions is a Big Data
problem, with the recent Literature indicating that the development of fast and
scalable algorithms computing AF functions is a high-priority task. Somewhat
surprisingly, despite the increasing popularity of Big Data technologies in
Computational Biology, the development of a Big Data platform for those tasks
has not been pursued, possibly due to its complexity. Results: We fill this
important gap by introducing FADE, the first extensible, efficient and scalable
Spark platform for Alignment-free genomic analysis. It supports natively
eighteen of the best performing AF functions coming out of a recent hallmark
benchmarking study. FADE development and potential impact comprises novel
aspects of interest. Namely, (a) a considerable effort of distributed
algorithms, the most tangible result being a much faster execution time of
reference methods like MASH and FSWM; (b) a software design that makes FADE
user-friendly and easily extendable by Spark non-specialists; (c) its ability
to support data- and compute-intensive tasks. About this, we provide a novel
and much needed analysis of how informative and robust AF functions are, in
terms of the statistical significance of their output. Our findings naturally
extend the ones of the highly regarded benchmarking study, since the functions
that can really be used are reduced to a handful of the eighteen included in
FADE
Methyl-CpG-binding domain sequencing reveals a prognostic methylation signature in neuroblastoma
Accurate assessment of neuroblastoma outcome prediction remains challenging. Therefore, this study aims at establishing novel prognostic tumor DNA methylation biomarkers. In total, 396 low- and high-risk primary tumors were analyzed, of which 87 were profiled using methyl-CpG-binding domain (MBD) sequencing for differential methylation analysis between prognostic patient groups. Subsequently, methylation-specific PCR (MSP) assays were developed for 78 top-ranking differentially methylated regions and tested on two independent cohorts of 132 and 177 samples, respectively. Further, a new statistical framework was used to identify a robust set of MSP assays of which the methylation score (i.e. the percentage of methylated assays) allows accurate outcome prediction. Survival analyses were performed on the individual target level, as well as on the combined multimarker signature. As a result of the differential DNA methylation assessment by MBD sequencing, 58 of the 78 MSP assays were designed in regions previously unexplored in neuroblastoma, and 36 are located in non-promoter or non-coding regions. In total, 5 individual MSP assays (located in CCDC177, NXPH1, lnc-MRPL3-2, lnc-TREX1-1 and one on a region from chromosome 8 with no further annotation) predict event-free survival and 4 additional assays (located in SPRED3, TNFAIP2, NPM2 and CYYR1) also predict overall survival. Furthermore, a robust 58-marker methylation signature predicting overall and event-free survival was established. In conclusion, this study encompasses the largest DNA methylation biomarker study in neuroblastoma so far. We identified and independently validated several novel prognostic biomarkers, as well as a prognostic 58-marker methylation signature
Predicting Pancreatic Cancer Using Support Vector Machine
This report presents an approach to predict pancreatic cancer using Support Vector Machine Classification algorithm. The research objective of this project it to predict pancreatic cancer on just genomic, just clinical and combination of genomic and clinical data. We have used real genomic data having 22,763 samples and 154 features per sample. We have also created Synthetic Clinical data having 400 samples and 7 features per sample in order to predict accuracy of just clinical data. To validate the hypothesis, we have combined synthetic clinical data with subset of features from real genomic data. In our results, we observed that prediction accuracy, precision, recall with just genomic data is 80.77%, 20%, 4%. Prediction accuracy, precision, recall with just synthetic clinical data is 93.33%, 95%, 30%. While prediction accuracy, precision, recall for combination of real genomic and synthetic clinical data is 90.83%, 10%, 5%. The combination of real genomic and synthetic clinical data decreased the accuracy since the genomic data is weakly correlated. Thus we conclude that the combination of genomic and clinical data does not improve pancreatic cancer prediction accuracy. A dataset with more significant genomic features might help to predict pancreatic cancer more accurately
- …