15,451 research outputs found
On Optimization Modulo Theories, MaxSMT and Sorting Networks
Optimization Modulo Theories (OMT) is an extension of SMT which allows for
finding models that optimize given objectives. (Partial weighted) MaxSMT --or
equivalently OMT with Pseudo-Boolean objective functions, OMT+PB-- is a
very-relevant strict subcase of OMT. We classify existing approaches for MaxSMT
or OMT+PB in two groups: MaxSAT-based approaches exploit the efficiency of
state-of-the-art MAXSAT solvers, but they are specific-purpose and not always
applicable; OMT-based approaches are general-purpose, but they suffer from
intrinsic inefficiencies on MaxSMT/OMT+PB problems.
We identify a major source of such inefficiencies, and we address it by
enhancing OMT by means of bidirectional sorting networks. We implemented this
idea on top of the OptiMathSAT OMT solver. We run an extensive empirical
evaluation on a variety of problems, comparing MaxSAT-based and OMT-based
techniques, with and without sorting networks, implemented on top of
OptiMathSAT and {\nu}Z. The results support the effectiveness of this idea, and
provide interesting insights about the different approaches.Comment: 17 pages, submitted at Tacas 1
Correcting Knowledge Base Assertions
The usefulness and usability of knowledge bases (KBs) is often limited by quality issues. One common issue is the presence of erroneous assertions, often caused by lexical or semantic confusion. We study the problem of correcting such assertions, and present a general correction framework which combines lexical matching, semantic embedding, soft constraint mining and semantic consistency checking. The framework is evaluated using DBpedia and an enterprise medical KB
XML Matchers: approaches and challenges
Schema Matching, i.e. the process of discovering semantic correspondences
between concepts adopted in different data source schemas, has been a key topic
in Database and Artificial Intelligence research areas for many years. In the
past, it was largely investigated especially for classical database models
(e.g., E/R schemas, relational databases, etc.). However, in the latest years,
the widespread adoption of XML in the most disparate application fields pushed
a growing number of researchers to design XML-specific Schema Matching
approaches, called XML Matchers, aiming at finding semantic matchings between
concepts defined in DTDs and XSDs. XML Matchers do not just take well-known
techniques originally designed for other data models and apply them on
DTDs/XSDs, but they exploit specific XML features (e.g., the hierarchical
structure of a DTD/XSD) to improve the performance of the Schema Matching
process. The design of XML Matchers is currently a well-established research
area. The main goal of this paper is to provide a detailed description and
classification of XML Matchers. We first describe to what extent the
specificities of DTDs/XSDs impact on the Schema Matching task. Then we
introduce a template, called XML Matcher Template, that describes the main
components of an XML Matcher, their role and behavior. We illustrate how each
of these components has been implemented in some popular XML Matchers. We
consider our XML Matcher Template as the baseline for objectively comparing
approaches that, at first glance, might appear as unrelated. The introduction
of this template can be useful in the design of future XML Matchers. Finally,
we analyze commercial tools implementing XML Matchers and introduce two
challenging issues strictly related to this topic, namely XML source clustering
and uncertainty management in XML Matchers.Comment: 34 pages, 8 tables, 7 figure
- …