Evaluation Measures for Text Summarization

We explain the ideas of automatic text summarization approaches and the taxonomy of summary evaluation methods. Moreover, we propose a new evaluation measure for assessing the quality of a summary. The core of the measure is covered by Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) which can capture the main topics of a document. The summarization systems are ranked according to the similarity of the main topics of their summaries and their reference documents. Results show a high correlation between human rankings and the LSA-based evaluation measure. The measure is designed to compare a summary with its full text. It can compare a summary with a human written abstract as well; however, in this case using a standard ROUGE measure gives more precise results. Nevertheless, if abstracts are not available for a given corpus, using the LSA-based measure is an appropriate choice

Comprehensive Review of Opinion Summarization

The abundance of opinions on the web has kindled the study of opinion summarization over the last few years. People have introduced various techniques and paradigms to solving this special task. This survey attempts to systematically investigate the different techniques and approaches used in opinion summarization. We provide a multi-perspective classification of the approaches used and highlight some of the key weaknesses of these approaches. This survey also covers evaluation techniques and data sets used in studying the opinion summarization problem. Finally, we provide insights into some of the challenges that are left to be addressed as this will help set the trend for future research in this area.unpublishednot peer reviewe

Keyphrase Based Evaluation of Automatic Text Summarization

The development of methods to deal with the informative contents of the text units in the matching process is a major challenge in automatic summary evaluation systems that use fixed n-gram matching. The limitation causes inaccurate matching between units in a peer and reference summaries. The present study introduces a new Keyphrase based Summary Evaluator KpEval for evaluating automatic summaries. The KpEval relies on the keyphrases since they convey the most important concepts of a text. In the evaluation process, the keyphrases are used in their lemma form as the matching text unit. The system was applied to evaluate different summaries of Arabic multi-document data set presented at TAC2011. The results showed that the new evaluation technique correlates well with the known evaluation systems: Rouge1, Rouge2, RougeSU4, and AutoSummENG MeMoG. KpEval has the strongest correlation with AutoSummENG MeMoG, Pearson and spearman correlation coefficient measures are 0.8840, 0.9667 respectively.Comment: 4 pages, 1 figure, 3 table