Enhanced amplitude modulations contribute to the Lombard intelligibility benefit: Evidence from the Nijmegen Corpus of Lombard Speech

Speakers adjust their voice when talking in noise, which is known as Lombard speech. These acoustic adjustments facilitate speech comprehension in noise relative to plain speech (i.e., speech produced in quiet). However, exactly which characteristics of Lombard speech drive this intelligibility benefit in noise remains unclear. This study assessed the contribution of enhanced amplitude modulations to the Lombard speech intelligibility benefit by demonstrating that (1) native speakers of Dutch in the Nijmegen Corpus of Lombard Speech (NiCLS) produce more pronounced amplitude modulations in noise vs. in quiet; (2) more enhanced amplitude modulations correlate positively with intelligibility in a speech-in-noise perception experiment; (3) transplanting the amplitude modulations from Lombard speech onto plain speech leads to an intelligibility improvement, suggesting that enhanced amplitude modulations in Lombard speech contribute towards intelligibility in noise. Results are discussed in light of recent neurobiological models of speech perception with reference to neural oscillators phase-locking to the amplitude modulations in speech, guiding the processing of speech

The listening talker: A review of human and algorithmic context-induced modifications of speech

International audienceSpeech output technology is finding widespread application, including in scenarios where intelligibility might be compromised - at least for some listeners - by adverse conditions. Unlike most current algorithms, talkers continually adapt their speech patterns as a response to the immediate context of spoken communication, where the type of interlocutor and the environment are the dominant situational factors influencing speech production. Observations of talker behaviour can motivate the design of more robust speech output algorithms. Starting with a listener-oriented categorisation of possible goals for speech modification, this review article summarises the extensive set of behavioural findings related to human speech modification, identifies which factors appear to be beneficial, and goes on to examine previous computational attempts to improve intelligibility in noise. The review concludes by tabulating 46 speech modifications, many of which have yet to be perceptually or algorithmically evaluated. Consequently, the review provides a roadmap for future work in improving the robustness of speech output

A study on the relationship between the intelligibility and quality of algorithmically-modified speech for normal hearing listeners

This study investigates the relationship between the intelligibility and quality of modified speech in noise and in quiet. Speech signals were processed by seven algorithms designed to increase speech intelligibility in noise without altering speech intensity. In three noise maskers, including both stationary and fluctuating noise at two signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), listeners identified keywords from unmodified or modified sentences. The intelligibility performance of each type of speech was measured as the listeners’ word recognition rate in each condition, while the quality was rated as a mean opinion score. In quiet, only the perceptual quality of each type of speech was assessed. The results suggest that when listening in noise, modification performance on improving intelligibility is more important than its potential negative impact on speech quality. However, when listening in quiet or at SNRs in which intelligibility is no longer an issue to listeners, the impact to speech quality due to modification becomes a concern

Investigating supra-intelligibility aspects of speech

158 p.Synthetic and recorded speech form a great part of oureveryday listening experience, and much of our exposure tothese forms of speech occurs in potentially noisy settings such as on public transport, in the classroom or workplace, while driving, and in our homes. Optimising speech output to ensure that salient information is both correctly and effortlessly received is a main concern for the designers of applications that make use of the speech modality. Most of the focus in adapting speech output to challenging listening conditions has been on intelligibility, and specifically on enhancing intelligibility by modifying speech prior to presentation. However, the quality of the generated speech is not always satisfying for the recipient, which might lead to fatigue, or reluctance in using this communication modality. Consequently, a sole focus on intelligibility enhancement provides an incomplete picture of a listener¿s experience since the effect of modified or synthetic speech on other characteristics risks being ignored. These concerns motivate the study of 'supra-intelligibility' factors such as the additional cognitive demand that modified speech may well impose upon listeners, as well as quality, naturalness, distortion and pleasantness. This thesis reports on an investigation into two supra-intelligibility factors: listening effort and listener preferences. Differences in listening effort across four speech types (plain natural, Lombard, algorithmically-enhanced, and synthetic speech) were measured using existing methods, including pupillometry, subjective judgements, and intelligibility scores. To explore the effects of speech features on listener preferences, a new tool, SpeechAdjuster, was developed. SpeechAdjuster allows the manipulation of virtually any aspect of speech and supports the joint elicitation of listener preferences and intelligibility measures. The tool reverses the roles of listener and experimenter by allowing listeners direct control of speech characteristics in real-time. Several experiments to explore the effects of speech properties on listening preferences and intelligibility using SpeechAdjuster were conducted. Participants were permitted to change a speech feature during an open-ended adjustment phase, followed by a test phase in which they identified speech presented with the feature value selected at the end of the adjustment phase. Experiments with native normal-hearing listeners measured the consequences of allowing listeners to change speech rate, fundamental frequency, and other features which led to spectral energy redistribution. Speech stimuli were presented in both quiet and masked conditions. Results revealed that listeners prefer feature modifications similar to those observed in naturally modified speech in noise (Lombard speech). Further, Lombard speech required the least listening effort compared to either plain natural, algorithmically-enhanced, or synthetic speech. For stationary noise, as noise level increased listeners chose slower speech rates and flatter tilts compared to the original speech. Only the choice of fundamental frequency was not consistent with that observed in Lombard speech. It is possible that features such as fundamental frequency that talkers naturally modify are by-products of the speech type (e.g. hyperarticulated speech) and might not be advantageous for the listener.Findings suggest that listener preferences provide information about the processing of speech over and above that measured by intelligibility. One of the listeners¿ concerns was to maximise intelligibility. In noise, listeners preferred the feature values for which more information survived masking, choosing speech rates that led to a contrast with the modulation rate of the masker, or modifications that led to a shift of spectral energy concentration to higher frequencies compared to those of the masker. For all features being modified by listeners, preferences were evident even when intelligibility was at or close to ceiling levels. Such preferences might result from a desire to reduce the cognitive effort of understanding speech, or from a desire to reproduce the sound of typical speech features experienced in real-world noisy conditions, or to optimise the quality of the modified signal. Investigation of supra-intelligibility aspects of speech promises to improve the quality of speech enhancement algorithms, bringing with it the potential of reducing the effort of understanding artificially-modified or generated forms of speech

The impact of speech type on listening effort and intelligibility for native and non-native listeners

Listeners are routinely exposed to many different types of speech, including artificially-enhanced and synthetic speech, styles which deviate to a greater or lesser extent from naturally-spoken exemplars. While the impact of differing speech types on intelligibility is well-studied, it is less clear how such types affect cognitive processing demands, and in particular whether those speech forms with the greatest intelligibility in noise have a commensurately lower listening effort. The current study measured intelligibility, self-reported listening effort, and a pupillometry-based measure of cognitive load for four distinct types of speech: (i) plain i.e. natural unmodified speech; (ii) Lombard speech, a naturally-enhanced form which occurs when speaking in the presence of noise; (iii) artificially-enhanced speech which involves spectral shaping and dynamic range compression; and (iv) speech synthesized from text. In the first experiment a cohort of 26 native listeners responded to the four speech types in three levels of speech-shaped noise. In a second experiment, 31 non-native listeners underwent the same procedure at more favorable signal-to-noise ratios, chosen since second language listening in noise has a more detrimental effect on intelligibility than listening in a first language. For both native and non-native listeners, artificially-enhanced speech was the most intelligible and led to the lowest subjective effort ratings, while the reverse was true for synthetic speech. However, pupil data suggested that Lombard speech elicited the lowest processing demands overall. These outcomes indicate that the relationship between intelligibility and cognitive processing demands is not a simple inverse, but is mediated by speech type. The findings of the current study motivate the search for speech modification algorithms that are optimized for both intelligibility and listening effort.</p

The impact of sound field systems on learning and attention in elementary school classrooms

Purpose: An evaluation of the installation and use of sound field systems (SFS) was carried out to investigate their impact on teaching and learning in elementary school classrooms. Methods: The evaluation included acoustic surveys of classrooms, questionnaire surveys of students and teachers and experimental testing of students with and without the use of SFS. Students ’ perceptions of classroom environments and objective data evaluating change in performance on cognitive and academic assessments with amplification over a six month period are reported. Results: Teachers were positive about the use of SFS in improving children’s listening and attention to verbal instructions. Over time students in amplified classrooms did not differ from those in nonamplified classrooms in their reports of listening conditions, nor did their performance differ in measures of numeracy, reading or spelling. Use of SFS in the classrooms resulted in significantly larger gains in performance in the number of correct items on the nonverbal measure of speed of processing and the measure of listening comprehension. Analysis controlling for classroom acoustics indicated that students ’ listening comprehension score

Learning static spectral weightings for speech intelligibility enhancement in noise

Near-end speech enhancement works by modifying speech prior to presentation in a noisy environment, typically operating under a constraint of limited or no increase in speech level. One issue is the extent to which near-end enhancement techniques require detailed estimates of the masking environment to function effectively. The current study investigated speech modification strategies based on reallocating energy statically across the spectrum using masker-specific spectral weightings. Weighting patterns were learned offline by maximising a glimpse-based objective intelligibility metric. Keyword scores in sentences in the presence of stationary and fluctuating maskers increased, in some cases by very substantial amounts, following the application of masker- and SNR-specific spectral weighting. A second experiment using generic masker-independent spectral weightings that boosted all frequencies above 1 kHz also led to significant gains in most conditions. These findings indicate that energy-neutral spectral weighting is a highly-effective near-end speech enhancement approach that places minimal demands on detailed masker estimation