7,059 research outputs found
Evaluating Semantic Parsing against a Simple Web-based Question Answering Model
Semantic parsing shines at analyzing complex natural language that involves
composition and computation over multiple pieces of evidence. However, datasets
for semantic parsing contain many factoid questions that can be answered from a
single web document. In this paper, we propose to evaluate semantic
parsing-based question answering models by comparing them to a question
answering baseline that queries the web and extracts the answer only from web
snippets, without access to the target knowledge-base. We investigate this
approach on COMPLEXQUESTIONS, a dataset designed to focus on compositional
language, and find that our model obtains reasonable performance (35 F1
compared to 41 F1 of state-of-the-art). We find in our analysis that our model
performs well on complex questions involving conjunctions, but struggles on
questions that involve relation composition and superlatives.Comment: *sem 201
Joint Video and Text Parsing for Understanding Events and Answering Queries
We propose a framework for parsing video and text jointly for understanding
events and answering user queries. Our framework produces a parse graph that
represents the compositional structures of spatial information (objects and
scenes), temporal information (actions and events) and causal information
(causalities between events and fluents) in the video and text. The knowledge
representation of our framework is based on a spatial-temporal-causal And-Or
graph (S/T/C-AOG), which jointly models possible hierarchical compositions of
objects, scenes and events as well as their interactions and mutual contexts,
and specifies the prior probabilistic distribution of the parse graphs. We
present a probabilistic generative model for joint parsing that captures the
relations between the input video/text, their corresponding parse graphs and
the joint parse graph. Based on the probabilistic model, we propose a joint
parsing system consisting of three modules: video parsing, text parsing and
joint inference. Video parsing and text parsing produce two parse graphs from
the input video and text respectively. The joint inference module produces a
joint parse graph by performing matching, deduction and revision on the video
and text parse graphs. The proposed framework has the following objectives:
Firstly, we aim at deep semantic parsing of video and text that goes beyond the
traditional bag-of-words approaches; Secondly, we perform parsing and reasoning
across the spatial, temporal and causal dimensions based on the joint S/T/C-AOG
representation; Thirdly, we show that deep joint parsing facilitates subsequent
applications such as generating narrative text descriptions and answering
queries in the forms of who, what, when, where and why. We empirically
evaluated our system based on comparison against ground-truth as well as
accuracy of query answering and obtained satisfactory results
Open-Vocabulary Semantic Parsing with both Distributional Statistics and Formal Knowledge
Traditional semantic parsers map language onto compositional, executable
queries in a fixed schema. This mapping allows them to effectively leverage the
information contained in large, formal knowledge bases (KBs, e.g., Freebase) to
answer questions, but it is also fundamentally limiting---these semantic
parsers can only assign meaning to language that falls within the KB's
manually-produced schema. Recently proposed methods for open vocabulary
semantic parsing overcome this limitation by learning execution models for
arbitrary language, essentially using a text corpus as a kind of knowledge
base. However, all prior approaches to open vocabulary semantic parsing replace
a formal KB with textual information, making no use of the KB in their models.
We show how to combine the disparate representations used by these two
approaches, presenting for the first time a semantic parser that (1) produces
compositional, executable representations of language, (2) can successfully
leverage the information contained in both a formal KB and a large corpus, and
(3) is not limited to the schema of the underlying KB. We demonstrate
significantly improved performance over state-of-the-art baselines on an
open-domain natural language question answering task.Comment: Re-written abstract and intro, other minor changes throughout. This
version published at AAAI 201
Visual Question Answering: A Survey of Methods and Datasets
Visual Question Answering (VQA) is a challenging task that has received
increasing attention from both the computer vision and the natural language
processing communities. Given an image and a question in natural language, it
requires reasoning over visual elements of the image and general knowledge to
infer the correct answer. In the first part of this survey, we examine the
state of the art by comparing modern approaches to the problem. We classify
methods by their mechanism to connect the visual and textual modalities. In
particular, we examine the common approach of combining convolutional and
recurrent neural networks to map images and questions to a common feature
space. We also discuss memory-augmented and modular architectures that
interface with structured knowledge bases. In the second part of this survey,
we review the datasets available for training and evaluating VQA systems. The
various datatsets contain questions at different levels of complexity, which
require different capabilities and types of reasoning. We examine in depth the
question/answer pairs from the Visual Genome project, and evaluate the
relevance of the structured annotations of images with scene graphs for VQA.
Finally, we discuss promising future directions for the field, in particular
the connection to structured knowledge bases and the use of natural language
processing models.Comment: 25 page
A Survey of Paraphrasing and Textual Entailment Methods
Paraphrasing methods recognize, generate, or extract phrases, sentences, or
longer natural language expressions that convey almost the same information.
Textual entailment methods, on the other hand, recognize, generate, or extract
pairs of natural language expressions, such that a human who reads (and trusts)
the first element of a pair would most likely infer that the other element is
also true. Paraphrasing can be seen as bidirectional textual entailment and
methods from the two areas are often similar. Both kinds of methods are useful,
at least in principle, in a wide range of natural language processing
applications, including question answering, summarization, text generation, and
machine translation. We summarize key ideas from the two areas by considering
in turn recognition, generation, and extraction methods, also pointing to
prominent articles and resources.Comment: Technical Report, Natural Language Processing Group, Department of
Informatics, Athens University of Economics and Business, Greece, 201
University of Sheffield TREC-8 Q & A System
The system entered by the University of Sheffield in the question answering track of TREC-8 is the result of coupling two existing technologies - information retrieval (IR) and information extraction (IE). In essence the approach is this: the IR system treats the question as a query and returns a set of top ranked documents or passages; the IE system uses NLP techniques to parse the question, analyse the top ranked documents or passages returned by the IR system, and instantiate a query variable in the semantic representation of the question against the semantic representation of the analysed documents or passages. Thus, while the IE system by no means attempts “full text understanding", this approach is a relatively deep approach which attempts to work with meaning representations.
Since the information retrieval systems we used were not our own (AT&T and UMass) and were used more or less “off the shelf", this paper concentrates on describing the modifications made to our existing information extraction system to allow it to participate in the Q & A task
- …