Teadusarvutuse algoritmide taandamine hajusarvutuse raamistikele

Teadusarvutuses kasutatakse arvuteid ja algoritme selleks, et lahendada probleeme erinevates reaalteadustes nagu geneetika, bioloogia ja keemia. Tihti on eesmärgiks selliste loodusnähtuste modelleerimine ja simuleerimine, mida päris keskkonnas oleks väga raske uurida. Näiteks on võimalik luua päikesetormi või meteoriiditabamuse mudel ning arvutisimulatsioonide abil hinnata katastroofi mõju keskkonnale. Mida keerulisemad ja täpsemad on sellised simulatsioonid, seda rohkem arvutusvõimsust on vaja. Tihti kasutatakse selleks suurt hulka arvuteid, mis kõik samaaegselt töötavad ühe probleemi kallal. Selliseid arvutusi nimetatakse paralleel- või hajusarvutusteks. Hajusarvutuse programmide loomine on aga keeruline ning nõuab palju rohkem aega ja ressursse, kuna vaja on sünkroniseerida erinevates arvutites samaaegselt tehtavat tööd. On loodud mitmeid tarkvararaamistikke, mis lihtsustavad seda tööd automatiseerides osa hajusprogrammeerimisest. Selle teadustöö eesmärk oli uurida selliste hajusarvutusraamistike sobivust keerulisemate teadusarvutuse algoritmide jaoks. Tulemused näitasid, et olemasolevad raamistikud on üksteisest väga erinevad ning neist ükski ei ole sobiv kõigi erinevat tüüpi algoritmide jaoks. Mõni raamistik on sobiv ainult lihtsamate algoritmide jaoks; mõni ei sobi olukorras, kus andmed ei mahu arvutite mällu. Algoritmi jaoks kõige sobivama hajusarvutisraamistiku valimine võib olla väga keeruline ülesanne, kuna see nõuab olemasolevate raamistike uurimist ja rakendamist. Sellele probleemile lahendust otsides otsustati luua dünaamiline algoritmide modelleerimise rakendus (DAMR), mis oskab simuleerida algoritmi implementatsioone erinevates hajusarvutusraamistikes. DAMR aitab hinnata milline hajusraamistik on kõige sobivam ette antud algoritmi jaoks, ilma algoritmi reaalselt ühegi hajusraamistiku peale implementeerimata. Selle uurimustöö peamine panus on hajusarvutusraamistike kasutuselevõtu lihtsamaks tegemine teadlastele, kes ei ole varem nende kasutamisega kokku puutunud. See peaks märkimisväärselt aega ja ressursse kokku hoidma, kuna ei pea ükshaaval kõiki olemasolevaid hajusraamistikke tundma õppima ja rakendama.Scientific computing uses computers and algorithms to solve problems in various sciences such as genetics, biology and chemistry. Often the goal is to model and simulate different natural phenomena which would otherwise be very difficult to study in real environments. For example, it is possible to create a model of a solar storm or a meteor hit and run computer simulations to assess the impact of the disaster on the environment. The more sophisticated and accurate the simulations are the more computing power is required. It is often necessary to use a large number of computers, all working simultaneously on a single problem. These kind of computations are called parallel or distributed computing. However, creating distributed computing programs is complicated and requires a lot more time and resources, because it is necessary to synchronize different computers working at the same time. A number of software frameworks have been created to simplify this process by automating part of a distributed programming. The goal of this research was to assess the suitability of such distributed computing frameworks for complex scientific computing algorithms. The results showed that existing frameworks are very different from each other and none of them are suitable for all different types of algorithms. Some frameworks are only suitable for simple algorithms; others are not suitable when data does not fit into the computer memory. Choosing the most appropriate distributed computing framework for an algorithm can be a very complex task, because it requires studying and applying the existing frameworks. While searching for a solution to this problem, it was decided to create a Dynamic Algorithms Modelling Application (DAMA), which is able to simulate the implementation of the algorithm in different distributed computing frameworks. DAMA helps to estimate which distributed framework is the most appropriate for a given algorithm, without actually implementing it in any of the available frameworks. This main contribution of this study is simplifying the adoption of distributed computing frameworks for researchers who are not yet familiar with using them. It should save significant time and resources as it is not necessary to study each of the available distributed computing frameworks in detail

Scientific Computing Meets Big Data Technology: An Astronomy Use Case

Scientific analyses commonly compose multiple single-process programs into a dataflow. An end-to-end dataflow of single-process programs is known as a many-task application. Typically, tools from the HPC software stack are used to parallelize these analyses. In this work, we investigate an alternate approach that uses Apache Spark -- a modern big data platform -- to parallelize many-task applications. We present Kira, a flexible and distributed astronomy image processing toolkit using Apache Spark. We then use the Kira toolkit to implement a Source Extractor application for astronomy images, called Kira SE. With Kira SE as the use case, we study the programming flexibility, dataflow richness, scheduling capacity and performance of Apache Spark running on the EC2 cloud. By exploiting data locality, Kira SE achieves a 2.5x speedup over an equivalent C program when analyzing a 1TB dataset using 512 cores on the Amazon EC2 cloud. Furthermore, we show that by leveraging software originally designed for big data infrastructure, Kira SE achieves competitive performance to the C implementation running on the NERSC Edison supercomputer. Our experience with Kira indicates that emerging Big Data platforms such as Apache Spark are a performant alternative for many-task scientific applications

Automatically Leveraging MapReduce Frameworks for Data-Intensive Applications

MapReduce is a popular programming paradigm for developing large-scale, data-intensive computation. Many frameworks that implement this paradigm have recently been developed. To leverage these frameworks, however, developers must become familiar with their APIs and rewrite existing code. Casper is a new tool that automatically translates sequential Java programs into the MapReduce paradigm. Casper identifies potential code fragments to rewrite and translates them in two steps: (1) Casper uses program synthesis to search for a program summary (i.e., a functional specification) of each code fragment. The summary is expressed using a high-level intermediate language resembling the MapReduce paradigm and verified to be semantically equivalent to the original using a theorem prover. (2) Casper generates executable code from the summary, using either the Hadoop, Spark, or Flink API. We evaluated Casper by automatically converting real-world, sequential Java benchmarks to MapReduce. The resulting benchmarks perform up to 48.2x faster compared to the original.Comment: 12 pages, additional 4 pages of references and appendi

BDEv 3.0: energy efficiency and microarchitectural characterization of Big Data processing frameworks

This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Future Generation Computer Systems. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.04.030[Abstract] As the size of Big Data workloads keeps increasing, the evaluation of distributed frameworks becomes a crucial task in order to identify potential performance bottlenecks that may delay the processing of large datasets. While most of the existing works generally focus only on execution time and resource utilization, analyzing other important metrics is key to fully understanding the behavior of these frameworks. For example, microarchitecture-level events can bring meaningful insights to characterize the interaction between frameworks and hardware. Moreover, energy consumption is also gaining increasing attention as systems scale to thousands of cores. This work discusses the current state of the art in evaluating distributed processing frameworks, while extending our Big Data Evaluator tool (BDEv) to extract energy efficiency and microarchitecture-level metrics from the execution of representative Big Data workloads. An experimental evaluation using BDEv demonstrates its usefulness to bring meaningful information from popular frameworks such as Hadoop, Spark and Flink.Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad; TIN2016-75845-PMinisterio de Educación; FPU14/02805Ministerio de Educación; FPU15/0338

Analysis and evaluation of MapReduce solutions on an HPC cluster

This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Computers & Electrical Engineering. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2015.11.021[Abstract] The ever growing needs of Big Data applications are demanding challenging capabilities which cannot be handled easily by traditional systems, and thus more and more organizations are adopting High Performance Computing (HPC) to improve scalability and efficiency. Moreover, Big Data frameworks like Hadoop need to be adapted to leverage the available resources in HPC environments. This situation has caused the emergence of several HPC-oriented MapReduce frameworks, which benefit from different technologies traditionally oriented to supercomputing, such as high-performance interconnects or the message-passing interface. This work aims to establish a taxonomy of these frameworks together with a thorough evaluation, which has been carried out in terms of performance and energy efficiency metrics. Furthermore, the adaptability to emerging disks technologies, such as solid state drives, has been assessed. The results have shown that new frameworks like DataMPI can outperform Hadoop, although using IP over InfiniBand also provides significant benefits without code modifications.Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; TIN2013-42148-