A Practical Procedure to Integrate the First 1:500 Urban Map of Valencia into a Tile-Based Geospatial Information System

[EN] The use of geographic data from early maps is a common approach to understanding urban geography as well as to study the evolution of cities over time. The specific goal of this paper is to provide a means for the integration of the first 1:500 urban map of the city of Valencia (Spain) on a tile-based geospatial system. We developed a workflow consisting of three stages: the digitization of the original 421 map sheets, the transformation to the European Terrestrial Reference System of 1989 (ETRS89), and the conversion to a tile-based file format, where the second stage is clearly the most mathematically involved. The second stage actually consists of two steps, one transformation from the pixel reference system to the 1929 local reference system followed by a second transformation from the 1929 local to the ETRS89 system. The last stage comprises a map reprojection to adapt to tile-based geospatial standards. The paper describes a pilot study of one map sheet and results showed that the affine and bilinear transformations performed well in both transformations with average residuals under 6 and 3 cm respectively. The online viewer developed in this study shows that the derived tile-based map conforms to common standards and lines up well with other raster and vector datasets.Villar-Cano, M.; Jiménez-Martínez, MJ.; Marqués-Mateu, Á. (2019). A Practical Procedure to Integrate the First 1:500 Urban Map of Valencia into a Tile-Based Geospatial Information System. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 8(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi809037837889Bitelli, G., & Gatta, G. (2011). Digital Processing and 3D Modelling of an 18th Century Scenographic Map of Bologna. Advances in Cartography and GIScience. Volume 2, 129-146. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19214-2_9Brovelli, M. A., Minghini, M., Giori, G., & Beretta, M. (2012). Web Geoservices and Ancient Cadastral Maps: The Web C.A.R.T.E. Project. Transactions in GIS, 16(2), 125-142. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2012.01311.xBitelli, G., Cremonini, S., & Gatta, G. (2014). Cartographic heritage: Toward unconventional methods for quantitative analysis of pre-geodetic maps. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 15(2), 183-195. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2013.04.003Cardesín Díaz, J. M., & Araujo, J. M. (2016). Historic Urbanization Process in Spain (1746–2013). Journal of Urban History, 43(1), 33-52. doi:10.1177/0096144215583481Villar-Cano, M., Marqués-Mateu, Á., & Jiménez-Martínez, M. J. (2019). Triangulation network of 1929–1944 of the first 1:500 urban map of València. Survey Review, 52(373), 317-329. doi:10.1080/00396265.2018.1564599Chen, W., & Hill, C. (2005). Evaluation Procedure for Coordinate Transformation. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 131(2), 43-49. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9453(2005)131:2(43)ISO 19157:2013: Geographic Information—Data Qualityhttps://www.iso.org/standard/32575.htmlASPRS Positional Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Datahttps://www.asprs.org/news-resources/asprs-positional-accuracy-standards-for-digital-geospatial-dataEven-Tzur, G. (2018). Coordinate transformation with variable number of parameters. Survey Review, 52(370), 62-68. doi:10.1080/00396265.2018.1517477Yuanxi, Y., & Tianhe, X. (2002). Combined method of datum transformation between different coordinate systems. Geo-spatial Information Science, 5(4), 5-9. doi:10.1007/bf02826467Lehmann, R. (2014). Transformation model selection by multiple hypotheses testing. Journal of Geodesy, 88(12), 1117-1130. doi:10.1007/s00190-014-0747-

On environment difficulty and discriminating power

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10458-014-9257-1This paper presents a way to estimate the difficulty and discriminating power of any task instance. We focus on a very general setting for tasks: interactive (possibly multiagent) environments where an agent acts upon observations and rewards. Instead of analysing the complexity of the environment, the state space or the actions that are performed by the agent, we analyse the performance of a population of agent policies against the task, leading to a distribution that is examined in terms of policy complexity. This distribution is then sliced by the algorithmic complexity of the policy and analysed through several diagrams and indicators. The notion of environment response curve is also introduced, by inverting the performance results into an ability scale. We apply all these concepts, diagrams and indicators to two illustrative problems: a class of agent-populated elementary cellular automata, showing how the difficulty and discriminating power may vary for several environments, and a multiagent system, where agents can become predators or preys, and may need to coordinate. Finally, we discuss how these tools can be applied to characterise (interactive) tasks and (multi-agent) environments. These characterisations can then be used to get more insight about agent performance and to facilitate the development of adaptive tests for the evaluation of agent abilities.I thank the reviewers for their comments, especially those aiming at a clearer connection with the field of multi-agent systems and the suggestion of better approximations for the calculation of the response curves. The implementation of the elementary cellular automata used in the environments is based on the library 'CellularAutomaton' by John Hughes for R [58]. I am grateful to Fernando Soler-Toscano for letting me know about their work [65] on the complexity of 2D objects generated by elementary cellular automata. I would also like to thank David L. Dowe for his comments on a previous version of this paper. This work was supported by the MEC/MINECO projects CONSOLIDER-INGENIO CSD2007-00022 and TIN 2010-21062-C02-02, GVA project PROMETEO/2008/051, the COST - European Cooperation in the field of Scientific and Technical Research IC0801 AT, and the REFRAME project, granted by the European Coordinated Research on Long-term Challenges in Information and Communication Sciences & Technologies ERA-Net (CHIST-ERA), and funded by the Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad in Spain (PCIN-2013-037).José Hernández-Orallo (2015). On environment difficulty and discriminating power. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 29(3):402-454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-014-9257-1S402454293Anderson, J., Baltes, J., & Cheng, C. T. (2011). Robotics competitions as benchmarks for ai research. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 26(01), 11–17.Andre, D., & Russell, S. J. (2002). State abstraction for programmable reinforcement learning agents. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 119–125). Menlo Park, CA; Cambridge, MA; London; AAAI Press; MIT Press; 1999.Antunes, L., Fortnow, L., van Melkebeek, D., & Vinodchandran, N. V. (2006). Computational depth: Concept and applications. Theoretical Computer Science, 354(3), 391–404. Foundations of Computation Theory (FCT 2003), 14th Symposium on Fundamentals of Computation Theory 2003.Arai, K., Kaminka, G. A., Frank, I., & Tanaka-Ishii, K. (2003). Performance competitions as research infrastructure: Large scale comparative studies of multi-agent teams. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 7(1–2), 121–144.Ashcraft, M. H., Donley, R. D., Halas, M. A., & Vakali, M. (1992). Chapter 8 working memory, automaticity, and problem difficulty. In Jamie I.D. Campbell (Ed.), The nature and origins of mathematical skills, volume 91 of advances in psychology (pp. 301–329). North-Holland.Ay, N., Müller, M., & Szkola, A. (2010). Effective complexity and its relation to logical depth. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 56(9), 4593–4607.Barch, D. M., Braver, T. S., Nystrom, L. E., Forman, S. D., Noll, D. C., & Cohen, J. D. (1997). Dissociating working memory from task difficulty in human prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 35(10), 1373–1380.Bordini, R. H., Hübner, J. F., & Wooldridge, M. (2007). Programming multi-agent systems in AgentSpeak using Jason. London: Wiley. com.Boutilier, C., Reiter, R., Soutchanski, M., Thrun, S. et al. (2000). Decision-theoretic, high-level agent programming in the situation calculus. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 355–362). Menlo Park, CA; Cambridge, MA; London; AAAI Press; MIT Press; 1999.Busoniu, L., Babuska, R., & De Schutter, B. (2008). A comprehensive survey of multiagent reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, 38(2), 156–172.Chaitin, G. J. (1977). Algorithmic information theory. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 21, 350–359.Chedid, F. B. (2010). Sophistication and logical depth revisited. In 2010 IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA) (pp. 1–4). IEEE.Cheeseman, P., Kanefsky, B. & Taylor, W. M. (1991). Where the really hard problems are. In Proceedings of IJCAI-1991 (pp. 331–337).Dastani, M. (2008). 2APL: A practical agent programming language. Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, 16(3), 214–248.Delahaye, J. P. & Zenil, H. (2011). Numerical evaluation of algorithmic complexity for short strings: A glance into the innermost structure of randomness. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219(1), 63–77Dowe, D. L. (2008). Foreword re C. S. Wallace. Computer Journal, 51(5), 523–560. Christopher Stewart WALLACE (1933–2004) memorial special issue.Dowe, D. L., & Hernández-Orallo, J. (2012). IQ tests are not for machines, yet. Intelligence, 40(2), 77–81.Du, D. Z., & Ko, K. I. (2011). Theory of computational complexity (Vol. 58). London: Wiley-Interscience.Elo, A. E. (1978). The rating of chessplayers, past and present (Vol. 3). London: Batsford.Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Fatès, N. & Chevrier, V. (2010). How important are updating schemes in multi-agent systems? an illustration on a multi-turmite model. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1-Volume 1 (pp. 533–540). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.Ferber, J. & Müller, J. P. (1996). Influences and reaction: A model of situated multiagent systems. In Proceedings of Second International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS-96) (pp. 72–79).Ferrando, P. J. (2009). Difficulty, discrimination, and information indices in the linear factor analysis model for continuous item responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(1), 9–24.Ferrando, P. J. (2012). Assessing the discriminating power of item and test scores in the linear factor-analysis model. Psicológica, 33, 111–139.Gent, I. P., & Walsh, T. (1994). Easy problems are sometimes hard. Artificial Intelligence, 70(1), 335–345.Gershenson, C. & Fernandez, N. (2012). Complexity and information: Measuring emergence, self-organization, and homeostasis at multiple scales. Complexity, 18(2), 29–44.Gruner, S. (2010). Mobile agent systems and cellular automata. Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, 20(2), 198–233.Hardman, D. K., & Payne, S. J. (1995). Problem difficulty and response format in syllogistic reasoning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48(4), 945–975.He, J., Reeves, C., Witt, C., & Yao, X. (2007). A note on problem difficulty measures in black-box optimization: Classification, realizations and predictability. Evolutionary Computation, 15(4), 435–443.Hernández-Orallo, J. (2000). Beyond the turing test. Journal of Logic Language & Information, 9(4), 447–466.Hernández-Orallo, J. (2000). On the computational measurement of intelligence factors. In A. Meystel (Ed.), Performance metrics for intelligent systems workshop (pp. 1–8). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.Hernández-Orallo, J. (2000). Thesis: Computational measures of information gain and reinforcement in inference processes. AI Communications, 13(1), 49–50.Hernández-Orallo, J. (2010). A (hopefully) non-biased universal environment class for measuring intelligence of biological and artificial systems. In M. Hutter et al. (Ed.), 3rd International Conference on Artificial General Intelligence (pp. 182–183). Atlantis Press Extended report at http://users.dsic.upv.es/proy/anynt/unbiased.pdf .Hernández-Orallo, J., & Dowe, D. L. (2010). Measuring universal intelligence: Towards an anytime intelligence test. Artificial Intelligence, 174(18), 1508–1539.Hernández-Orallo, J., Dowe, D. L., España-Cubillo, S., Hernández-Lloreda, M. V., & Insa-Cabrera, J. (2011). On more realistic environment distributions for defining, evaluating and developing intelligence. In J. Schmidhuber, K. R. Thórisson, & M. Looks (Eds.), LNAI series on artificial general intelligence 2011 (Vol. 6830, pp. 82–91). Berlin: Springer.Hernández-Orallo, J., Dowe, D. L., & Hernández-Lloreda, M. V. (2014). Universal psychometrics: Measuring cognitive abilities in the machine kingdom. Cognitive Systems Research, 27, 50–74.Hernández-Orallo, J., Insa, J., Dowe, D. L. & Hibbard, B. (2012). Turing tests with turing machines. In A. Voronkov (Ed.), The Alan Turing Centenary Conference, Turing-100, Manchester, 2012, volume 10 of EPiC Series (pp. 140–156).Hernández-Orallo, J. & Minaya-Collado, N. (1998). A formal definition of intelligence based on an intensional variant of Kolmogorov complexity. In Proceedings of International Symposium of Engineering of Intelligent Systems (EIS’98) (pp. 146–163). ICSC Press.Hibbard, B. (2009). Bias and no free lunch in formal measures of intelligence. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 1(1), 54–61.Hoos, H. H. (1999). Sat-encodings, search space structure, and local search performance. In 1999 International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 16, pp. 296–303).Insa-Cabrera, J., Benacloch-Ayuso, J. L., & Hernández-Orallo, J. (2012). On measuring social intelligence: Experiments on competition and cooperation. In J. Bach, B. Goertzel, & M. Iklé (Eds.), AGI, volume 7716 of lecture notes in computer science (pp. 126–135). Berlin: Springer.Insa-Cabrera, J., Dowe, D. L., España-Cubillo, S., Hernández-Lloreda, M. V., & Hernández-Orallo, J. (2011). Comparing humans and AI agents. In J. Schmidhuber, K. R. Thórisson, & M. Looks (Eds.), LNAI series on artificial general intelligence 2011 (Vol. 6830, pp. 122–132). Berlin: Springer.Knuth, D. E. (1973). Sorting and searching, volume 3 of the art of computer programming. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Kotovsky, K., & Simon, H. A. (1990). What makes some problems really hard: Explorations in the problem space of difficulty. Cognitive Psychology, 22(2), 143–183.Legg, S. (2008). Machine super intelligence. PhD thesis, Department of Informatics, University of Lugano, June 2008.Legg, S., & Hutter, M. (2007). Universal intelligence: A definition of machine intelligence. Minds and Machines, 17(4), 391–444.Leonetti, M. & Iocchi, L. (2010). Improving the performance of complex agent plans through reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (Vol. 1, pp. 723–730). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.Levin, L. A. (1973). Universal sequential search problems. Problems of Information Transmission, 9(3), 265–266.Levin, L. A. (1986). Average case complete problems. SIAM Journal on Computing, 15, 285.Li, M., & Vitányi, P. (2008). An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity and its applications (3rd ed.). Berlin: Springer.Low, C. K., Chen, T. Y., & Rónnquist, R. (1999). Automated test case generation for bdi agents. Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, 2(4), 311–332.Madden, M. G., & Howley, T. (2004). Transfer of experience between reinforcement learning environments with progressive difficulty. Artificial Intelligence Review, 21(3), 375–398.Mellenbergh, G. J. (1994). Generalized linear item response theory. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 300.Michel, F. (2004). Formalisme, outils et éléments méthodologiques pour la modélisation et la simulation multi-agents. PhD thesis, Université des sciences et techniques du Languedoc, Montpellier.Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81.Orponen, P., Ko, K. I., Schöning, U., & Watanabe, O. (1994). Instance complexity. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 41(1), 96–121.Simon, H. A., & Kotovsky, K. (1963). Human acquisition of concepts for sequential patterns. Psychological Review, 70(6), 534.Team, R., et al. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Whiteson, S., Tanner, B., & White, A. (2010). The reinforcement learning competitions. The AI Magazine, 31(2), 81–94.Wiering, M., & van Otterlo, M. (Eds.). (2012). Reinforcement learning: State-of-the-art. Berlin: Springer.Wolfram, S. (2002). A new kind of science. Champaign, IL: Wolfram Media.Zatuchna, Z., & Bagnall, A. (2009). Learning mazes with aliasing states: An LCS algorithm with associative perception. Adaptive Behavior, 17(1), 28–57.Zenil, H. (2010). Compression-based investigation of the dynamical properties of cellular automata and other systems. Complex Systems, 19(1), 1–28.Zenil, H. (2011). Une approche expérimentale à la théorie algorithmique de la complexité. PhD thesis, Dissertation in fulfilment of the degree of Doctor in Computer Science, Université de Lille.Zenil, H., Soler-Toscano, F., Delahaye, J. P. & Gauvrit, N. (2012). Two-dimensional kolmogorov complexity and validation of the coding theorem method by compressibility. arXiv, preprint arXiv:1212.6745

Analisis Pengaruh Quality, Image, Brand Equity, dan Value terhadap Loyalitas Seller sebagai Salah Satu Partner E-marketplace di Lazada Indonesia

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh dari beberapa faktor yaitu quality, image, brand equity dan value terhadap loyalitas seller sebagai salah satu partner e-marketplace di Lazada Indonesia. Sampel diambil dengan menggunakan metode purposive sampling, dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 82 responden. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan kuesioner dan literatur. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah metode analisis regresi berganda untuk mengetahui pengaruh antara variabel-variabel bebas terhadap variabel terikat. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa; 1). Kualitas e-marketplace tidak berpengaruh positif dan siginifikan terhadap loyalitas seller 2). Citra Perusahaan penyedia e-marketplace berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap loyalitas seller 3). Ekuitas brand Perusahaan e-marketplace berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap loyalitas seller 4). Nilai yang dimiliki oleh Perusahaan e-marketplace berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap loyalitas seller 5). Kualitas Pelayanan, citra Perusahaan, ekuitas brand dan nilai Perusahaan secara bersama-sama berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap loyalitas seller sebagai salah satu partner e-marketplace di Lazada Indonesia. Loyalitas seller sebagai salah satu partner e-marketplace di Lazada Indonesia terbukti dipengaruhi oleh keempat variabel yang diteliti yaitu sebesar 74% dan sisanya 26% dipengaruhi oleh faktor atau variabel-variabel lainnya.Kata Kunci: Quality, Image, Brand Equity, Value, Loyalitas Seller2 This study aims to determine the effect of e-service quality, image, brand equity, and value to seller's loyalty as a partner in Lazada Indonesia e-marketplace. Samples were taken by using purposive sampling method, with the total number of sample is 82 respondents. The technique of collecting data is using questionnaires and literatures. The analytical method that used in this research is multiple regression analysis to determine the effect of independent variables on the dependent variable. The results of this study indicate that; 1). E-service quality does not affect significantly on seller's loyalty. 2). Image has a possitive and significant effect on seller's loyalty. 3). Brand Equity has a possitive and significant effect on seller's loyalty. 4). Value has a possitive and significant effect on seller's loyalty. 5). E-Service quality, value, brand equity, and value jointly has a positive and significant effect on seller's loyalty as a partner in Lazada Indonesia e-marketplace. The seller's loyalty shown to be affected by the independent variables in this study at 74% and 26% is influenced by other factors or variables.Keywords: Quality, Image, Brand Equity, Value, Seller's Loyalty DAFTAR PUSTAKA Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Aydın Erdal, and Savrul Burcu Kilinç, 2014. The Relationship between Globalization and E-Commerce: Turkish Case, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 150 1267 – 1276 Bresolles Grégory, Durrieu François, Senecal Sylvain. 2014. A consumer typology based on e-service quality and e-satisfaction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 21, 889–896 Brunn Peter, Jensen Martin, Skovgaard Jakob. 2002. e-Marketplaces: Crafting A Winning Strategy. European Management Journal Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 286–298 Cunha. 2012. An E-marketplace of Healthcare and Social Care Services: the perceived interest. Procedia Technology 5, 959 – 966 Chi Hsin Kuang, Yeh Huery Ren, Yang Ya Ting. 2009. The Impact of Brand Awareness on Consumer Purchase Intention: The Mediating Effect of Perceived Quality and Brand Loyalty. The Journal of International Management Studies, Volume 4, Number 1 Chien Shu-Hua, Chen Ying-Hueih, Hsu Chin-Yen. 2012. Exploring the impact of trust and relational embeddedness in e-marketplaces: An empirical study in Taiwan. Industrial Marketing Management 41, 460–468 Chircu Alina.M., Mahajan Vijay. 2006. Managing electronic commerce retail transaction costs for customer value. Decision Support Systems 42, 898– 914 D'ambra John, Ramburuth, Prem., & Vatanasakdakul, Savanid. 2010. IT Doesn't Fit! The Influence of Culture on B2B in Thailand. Journal of Global Information Technology Management (Ivy League Publishing). 10-38 Ghozali, Imam. 2006. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Sess. Cetakan Keempat. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponogoro ------------------. 2011. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS19, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang. ------------------. 2005. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: UNDIP Goes Paulo, Tu Yanbin, Tung Y.Alex. 2013. Seller heterogeneity in electronic marketplaces: A study of new and experienced sellers in eBay. Decision Support Systems 56, 247–258 Gunasekaran, A., Marri, H. B., McGaughey, R. E., & Nebhwani, M. D. 2002. E-Commerce and its impact on operations management. International Journal of Production Economics, 75,185–197. Hashemi Malayeri, B dan Bastani, F.2000. An introduction to the Internet and the World Wide Web, Part I, Journal of Medical Sciences, TarbiatModarres University, Summer 77, Issue 1, pp. 111. Ho Shu-Chun, and Kauffman Robert.J. 2010. Internet-based selling technology and e-commerce growth: a hybrid growth theory approach with cross-model inference. Inf Technol Manag, 12:409–429 Hong Ilyoo B. 2015. Understanding the consumer's online merchant selection process: The roles of product involvement, perceived risk, and trust expectation. International Journal of Information Management 35, 322–336 Janita M.Soledad, and Miranda F.Javier. 2013. The antecedents of client loyalty in business-to-business (B2B) electronic marketplaces. Industrial Marketing Management 42 814–823 Juntunen Mari, Juntunen Jouni, Juga Jari. 2010. Corporate brand equity and loyalty in B2B markets: A study amonglogistics service purchasers. Macmillan Publishers Ltd. Brand Management Vol. 18, 4/5, 300–311 Malhotra, Naresh, dan Birks, David, 2007. Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation 3rd Edition. London: Practice Hall Nam Janghyeon, Ekinci Yuksel, Whyatt Georgina. 2011. Brand Equity, Brand Loyalty and Consumer Satisfaction. Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 1009–1030 Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL a multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213–233. Pradiani, Theresia. 2014. Pengaruh Trait Competitiveness Terhadap Sales Performance (Studi Kasus di PT Allianz Life Indonesia). Jurnal JIBEKA, volume 8, 55 – 62. Rauyruen Papassapa, Miller Kenneth.E, Groth Markus. 2009. B2B services: linking service loyalty and brand equity, Journal of Service Marketing 23/3 175–186 Rayport, Jeffrey F and Jaworski, Bernard J. 2002. Introduction to E-commerce. Mcgraw Hill Rong Huang and Emine Sarigollu. 2011. How Brand Awareness Relates to Market Outcome, Brand Equity and the Marketing Mix. Journal of Business Research, vol.65, pp.92-99. S. Muylle, A. Basu, 2008. Online support for business processes by electronic intermediaries, Decision Support Systems 45 (4) 845–857. Savrul Mesut, Incekara Ahmet, Sener Sefer. 2014. The Potential of E-Commerce for SMEs in a Globalizing Business Environment, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 150 35 – 45 Sekaran, Uma, Bougie, Roger, 2010. Research methods for business: a skill building approach. Bandung: Alfabeta Severi Erfan, and Ling Kwek Choon. 2013. The Mediating Effects of Brand Association, Brand Loyalty, Brand Image and Perceived Quality on Brand Equity, Asian Social Science; Vol. 9, No. 3; 2013 Sugiyono. 2002. Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Bandung: CV Alfabeta ------------. 2008. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Cetakan Keduabelas. Bandung: Alfabeta -----------. 2010. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif & RND. Bandung: Alfabeta Syuhada Ahmad Anshorimuslim, dan Gambetta Windy. 2013. Online Marketplace for Indonesian Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Based on Social Media. Procedia Technology 11, 446 – 454 Tabachnick BG dan Fidel L.S, 2007. “Using Multivariate Statistic” (Fifth Edition) USA: Pearson Eduction Inc. Umar, Husein. 200. Metodologi Penelitian Untuk Skripsi dan Tesis Bisnis, Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka. White, A., Daniel, E., Ward, J., & Wilson, H., 2007. The adoption of consortium B2B emarketplaces: An exploratory study. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16, 71–103. Wu, Jen-Her., & Hisa, Tzyh-lih. 2004. Analysis of E-commerce innovation and impact: a hypercube model, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages 389–404 Wang Shan, and Archer Norm. 2007. Business-to-business collaboration through electronic marketplaces: An exploratory study. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 13 113–126 Zhao Jing, Wang Shan, Huang Wilfred.V. 2008. A study of B2B e-market in China: E-commerce process perspective. Information & Management 45, 242–248 Zhao Kexin, Xia Mu, Shaw Michael.J., Subramaniam Chandrasekar. 2009. The sustainability of B2B e-marketplaces: Ownership structure, market competition, and prior buyer–seller connections. Decision Support Systems 47, 105–114 Zikmund, William G. 2003. Customer Relationship Management: Integrating Marketing Strategy and Information Technology. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons Zuo Wenming, Huang Qiuping, Fan Chang, Zhang Zhenpeng. 2013. Quality management of B2C e-commerce service based on human factors engineering, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 12, 309–32

Improving Distributed Decision Making in Inventory Management: A Combined ABC-AHP Approach Supported by Teamwork

[EN] The need of organizations to ensure service levels that impact on customer satisfaction has required the design of collaborative processes among stakeholders involved in inventory decision making. The increase of quantity and variety of items, on the one hand, and demand and customer expectations, on the other hand, are transformed into a greater complexity in inventory management, requiring effective communication and agreements between the leaders of the logistics processes. Traditionally, decision making in inventory management was based on approaches conditioned only by cost or sales volume. These approaches must be overcome by others that consider multiple criteria, involving several areas of the companies and taking into account the opinions of the stakeholders involved in these decisions. Inventory management becomes part of a complex system that involves stakeholders from different areas of the company, where each agent has limited information and where the cooperation between such agents is key for the system's performance. In this paper, a distributed inventory control approach was used with the decisions allowing communication between the stakeholders and with a multicriteria group decision-making perspective. This work proposes a methodology that combines the analysis of the value chain and the AHP technique, in order to improve communication and the performance of the areas related to inventory management decision making. This methodology uses the areas of the value chain as a theoretical framework to identify the criteria necessary for the application of the AHP multicriteria group decision-making technique. These criteria were defined as indicators that measure the performance of the areas of the value chain related to inventory management and were used to classify ABC inventory of the products according to these selected criteria. Therefore, the methodology allows us to solve inventory management DDM based on multicriteria ABC classification and was validated in a Colombian company belonging to the graphic arts sector.Pérez Vergara, IG.; Arias Sánchez, JA.; Poveda Bautista, R.; Diego-Mas, JA. (2020). Improving Distributed Decision Making in Inventory Management: A Combined ABC-AHP Approach Supported by Teamwork. Complexity. 2020:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6758108S1132020Poveda-Bautista, R., Baptista, D. C., & García-Melón, M. (2012). Setting competitiveness indicators using BSC and ANP. International Journal of Production Research, 50(17), 4738-4752. doi:10.1080/00207543.2012.657964Castro Zuluaga, C. A., Velez Gallego, M. C., & Catro Urrego, J. A. (2011). Clasificación ABC Multicriterio: Tipos de Criterios y efectos en la asignación de pesos. ITECKNE, 8(2). doi:10.15332/iteckne.v8i2.35Morash, E. A., & Clinton, S. R. (1998). Supply Chain Integration: Customer Value through Collaborative Closeness versus Operational Excellence. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 6(4), 104-120. doi:10.1080/10696679.1998.11501814Fabbe-Costes, N. (2015). Évaluer la création de valeurdu Supply Chain Management. Logistique & Management, 23(4), 41-50. doi:10.1080/12507970.2015.11758621Flores, B. E., & Clay Whybark, D. (1986). Multiple Criteria ABC Analysis. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 6(3), 38-46. doi:10.1108/eb054765Partovi, F. Y., & Burton, J. (1993). Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for ABC Analysis. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 13(9), 29-44. doi:10.1108/01443579310043619Balaji, K., & Kumar, V. S. S. (2014). Multicriteria Inventory ABC Classification in an Automobile Rubber Components Manufacturing Industry. Procedia CIRP, 17, 463-468. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.044Ramanathan, R. (2006). ABC inventory classification with multiple-criteria using weighted linear optimization. Computers & Operations Research, 33(3), 695-700. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2004.07.014Van Kampen, T. J., Akkerman, R., & Pieter van Donk, D. (2012). SKU classification: a literature review and conceptual framework. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(7), 850-876. doi:10.1108/01443571211250112Flores, B. E., Olson, D. L., & Dorai, V. K. (1992). Management of multicriteria inventory classification. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 16(12), 71-82. doi:10.1016/0895-7177(92)90021-cGajpal, P. P., Ganesh, L. S., & Rajendran, C. (1994). Criticality analysis of spare parts using the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Economics, 35(1-3), 293-297. doi:10.1016/0925-5273(94)90095-7Scala, N. M., Rajgopal, J., & Needy, K. L. (2014). Managing Nuclear Spare Parts Inventories: A Data Driven Methodology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 61(1), 28-37. doi:10.1109/tem.2013.2283170Hadad, Y., & Keren, B. (2013). ABC inventory classification via linear discriminant analysis and ranking methods. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 14(4), 387. doi:10.1504/ijlsm.2013.052744Altay Guvenir, H., & Erel, E. (1998). Multicriteria inventory classification using a genetic algorithm. European Journal of Operational Research, 105(1), 29-37. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(97)00039-8Rezaei, J., & Dowlatshahi, S. (2010). A rule-based multi-criteria approach to inventory classification. International Journal of Production Research, 48(23), 7107-7126. doi:10.1080/00207540903348361Hatefi, S. M., Torabi, S. A., & Bagheri, P. (2013). Multi-criteria ABC inventory classification with mixed quantitative and qualitative criteria. International Journal of Production Research, 52(3), 776-786. doi:10.1080/00207543.2013.838328Ishizaka, A., Pearman, C., & Nemery, P. (2012). AHPSort: an AHP-based method for sorting problems. International Journal of Production Research, 50(17), 4767-4784. doi:10.1080/00207543.2012.657966Yu, M.-C. (2011). Multi-criteria ABC analysis using artificial-intelligence-based classification techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3416-3421. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.127Tsai, C.-Y., & Yeh, S.-W. (2008). A multiple objective particle swarm optimization approach for inventory classification. International Journal of Production Economics, 114(2), 656-666. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.02.017Aydin Keskin, G., & Ozkan, C. (2013). Multiple Criteria ABC Analysis with FCM Clustering. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2013, 1-7. doi:10.1155/2013/827274Lolli, F., Ishizaka, A., & Gamberini, R. (2014). New AHP-based approaches for multi-criteria inventory classification. International Journal of Production Economics, 156, 62-74. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.05.015Raja, A. M. L., Ai, T. J., & Astanti, R. D. (2016). A Clustering Classification of Spare Parts for Improving Inventory Policies. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 114, 012075. doi:10.1088/1757-899x/114/1/012075Zowid, F. M., Babai, M. Z., Douissa, M. R., & Ducq, Y. (2019). Multi-criteria inventory ABC classification using Gaussian Mixture Model. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(13), 1925-1930. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.484Babai, M. Z., Ladhari, T., & Lajili, I. (2014). On the inventory performance of multi-criteria classification methods: empirical investigation. International Journal of Production Research, 53(1), 279-290. doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.952791Schneeweiss, C. (2003). Distributed decision making––a unified approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 150(2), 237-252. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00501-5Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83. doi:10.1504/ijssci.2008.017590Cakir, O., & Canbolat, M. S. (2008). A web-based decision support system for multi-criteria inventory classification using fuzzy AHP methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 1367-1378. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.041Liu, J., Liao, X., Zhao, W., & Yang, N. (2016). A classification approach based on the outranking model for multiple criteria ABC analysis. Omega, 61, 19-34. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.07.004Douissa, M. R., & Jabeur, K. (2016). A New Model for Multi-criteria ABC Inventory Classification: PROAFTN Method. Procedia Computer Science, 96, 550-559. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.08.233Lolli, F., Balugani, E., Ishizaka, A., Gamberini, R., Rimini, B., & Regattieri, A. (2018). Machine learning for multi-criteria inventory classification applied to intermittent demand. Production Planning & Control, 30(1), 76-89. doi:10.1080/09537287.2018.1525506Kartal, H., Oztekin, A., Gunasekaran, A., & Cebi, F. (2016). An integrated decision analytic framework of machine learning with multi-criteria decision making for multi-attribute inventory classification. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 101, 599-613. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2016.06.004López-Soto, D., Angel-Bello, F., Yacout, S., & Alvarez, A. (2017). A multi-start algorithm to design a multi-class classifier for a multi-criteria ABC inventory classification problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 81, 12-21. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.048Dweiri, F., Kumar, S., Khan, S. A., & Jain, V. (2016). Designing an integrated AHP based decision support system for supplier selection in automotive industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 62, 273-283. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.06.030Bruno, G., Esposito, E., Genovese, A., & Simpson, M. (2016). Applying supplier selection methodologies in a multi-stakeholder environment: A case study and a critical assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 43, 271-285. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.016Poza, C. (2020). A Conceptual Model to Measure Football Player’s Market Value. A Proposal by means of an Analytic Hierarchy Process. [Un modelo conceptual para medir el valor de mercado de los futbolistas. Una propuesta a través de un proceso analítico jerárquico]. RICYDE. Revista internacional de ciencias del deporte, 16(59), 24-42. doi:10.5232/ricyde2020.05903Guarnieri, P., Sobreiro, V. A., Nagano, M. S., & Marques Serrano, A. L. (2015). The challenge of selecting and evaluating third-party reverse logistics providers in a multicriteria perspective: a Brazilian case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 209-219. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.040Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Selection of new production facilities with the Group Analytic Hierarchy Process Ordering method. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 7317-7325. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.004Partovi, F. Y., & Anandarajan, M. (2002). Classifying inventory using an artificial neural network approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 41(4), 389-404. doi:10.1016/s0360-8352(01)00064-xAlonso-Manzanedo, M., De-la -Fuente-Aragon, M. V., & Ros-McDonnell, L. (2013). A Proposed Collaborative Network Enterprise Model in the Fruit-and-Vegetable Sector Using Maturity Models. Annals of Industrial Engineering 2012, 359-366. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-5349-8_42Augusto, M., Lisboa, J., Yasin, M., & Figueira, J. R. (2008). Benchmarking in a multiple criteria performance context: An application and a conceptual framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 184(1), 244-254. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.05

Integrating case study and survey research methods: An example in information systems

The case for combining research methods generally, and more specifically that for combining qualitative and quantitative methods, is strong. Yet, research designs that extensively integrate both fieldwork (e.g. case studies) and survey research are rare. More¬over, some journals tend tacitly to specialize by methodology thereby encouraging purity of method. The multi-method model of research while not new, has not been appreciated. In this respect it is useful to articulate and describe its usage through example. By reference to a recently completed study of IS consultant engagement success factors this paper presents an analysis of the benefits of integrating case study and survey research methods. The emphasis is on the qualitative case study method and how it can compliment more quantitative survey research. Benefits are demonstrated through specific examples from the reference study.</i

Relationship between accounting benefits and ERP user satisfaction in the context of the fourth industrial revolution

The importance of corporate social responsibility is shaping investment decisions and entrepreneurial actions in diverse perspectives. The rapid growth of SMEs has tremendous impacts on the environment. Nonetheless, the economic emergence plan of Cameroon has prompted government support of SMEs through diverse projects. This saw economic growth increased to 3.8% and unemployment dropped to 4.3% caused by the expansion of private sector investments. The dilemma that necessitated this study is the response strategy of SMEs operators towards environmental sustainability. This study, thus seeks to examine the effects of entrepreneurial intentions and actions on environmental sustainability. The research is a conclusive case study design supported by the philosophical underpins of objectivism ontology and positivism epistemology. Data was sourced from four hundred (400) SMEs operators purposively sampled from the Centre and Littoral regions of Cameroon using structured questionnaire. Data was analysed using the Structural Equation Modelling technique with the aid of statistical packages including: SPSS 24 and AMOS 23. The study revealed that entrepreneurial action has weak positive statistical significant impacts on environmental sustainability; whereas entrepreneurial intention has strong positive statistical significant effects on environmental sustainability. Entrepreneurial intention comprised of self-efficacy and perceived control whereas, entrepreneurial actions involved entrepreneurial alertness and uncertainty. This study concludes that entrepreneurs in Cameroon have sustainable intentions to protect the environment but; the current actions taken are inadequate. This research recommends that entrepreneurs should enhance efforts toward attaining the state of genuine sustainabilit

Integration of an adaptive infotainment system in a vehicle and validation in real driving scenarios

More services, functionalities, and interfaces are increasingly being incorporated into current vehicles and may overload the driver capacity to perform primary driving tasks adequately. For this reason, a strategy for easing driver interaction with the infotainment system must be defined, and a good balance between road safety and driver experience must also be achieved. An adaptive Human Machine Interface (HMI) that manages the presentation of information and restricts drivers’ interaction in accordance with the driving complexity was designed and evaluated. For this purpose, the driving complexity value employed as a reference was computed by a predictive model, and the adaptive interface was designed following a set of proposed HMI principles. The system was validated performing acceptance and usability tests in real driving scenarios. Results showed the system performs well in real driving scenarios. Also, positive feedbacks were received from participants endorsing the benefits of integrating this kind of system as regards driving experience and road safety.Postprint (published version