From brain to earth and climate systems: Small-world interaction networks or not?

We consider recent reports on small-world topologies of interaction networks derived from the dynamics of spatially extended systems that are investigated in diverse scientific fields such as neurosciences, geophysics, or meteorology. With numerical simulations that mimic typical experimental situations we have identified an important constraint when characterizing such networks: indications of a small-world topology can be expected solely due to the spatial sampling of the system along with commonly used time series analysis based approaches to network characterization

Discriminating different classes of biological networks by analyzing the graphs spectra distribution

The brain's structural and functional systems, protein-protein interaction, and gene networks are examples of biological systems that share some features of complex networks, such as highly connected nodes, modularity, and small-world topology. Recent studies indicate that some pathologies present topological network alterations relative to norms seen in the general population. Therefore, methods to discriminate the processes that generate the different classes of networks (e.g., normal and disease) might be crucial for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of the disease. It is known that several topological properties of a network (graph) can be described by the distribution of the spectrum of its adjacency matrix. Moreover, large networks generated by the same random process have the same spectrum distribution, allowing us to use it as a "fingerprint". Based on this relationship, we introduce and propose the entropy of a graph spectrum to measure the "uncertainty" of a random graph and the Kullback-Leibler and Jensen-Shannon divergences between graph spectra to compare networks. We also introduce general methods for model selection and network model parameter estimation, as well as a statistical procedure to test the nullity of divergence between two classes of complex networks. Finally, we demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed methods by applying them on (1) protein-protein interaction networks of different species and (2) on networks derived from children diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and typically developing children. We conclude that scale-free networks best describe all the protein-protein interactions. Also, we show that our proposed measures succeeded in the identification of topological changes in the network while other commonly used measures (number of edges, clustering coefficient, average path length) failed

Resource-constrained classification using a cascade of neural network layers

Deep neural networks are the state of the art technique for a wide variety of classification problems. Although deeper networks are able to make more accurate classifications, the value brought by an additional hidden layer diminishes rapidly. Even shallow networks are able to achieve relatively good results on various classification problems. Only for a small subset of the samples do the deeper layers make a significant difference. We describe an architecture in which only the samples that can not be classified with a sufficient confidence by a shallow network have to be processed by the deeper layers. Instead of training a network with one output layer at the end of the network, we train several output layers, one for each hidden layer. When an output layer is sufficiently confident in this result, we stop propagating at this layer and the deeper layers need not be evaluated. The choice of a threshold confidence value allows us to trade-off accuracy and speed. Applied in the Internet-of-things (IoT) context, this approach makes it possible to distribute the layers of a neural network between low powered devices and powerful servers in the cloud. We only need the remote layers when the local layers are unable to make an accurate classification. Such an architecture adds the intelligence of a deep neural network to resource constrained devices such as sensor nodes and various IoT devices. We evaluated our approach on the MNIST and CIFAR10 datasets. On the MNIST dataset, we retain the same accuracy at half the computational cost. On the more difficult CIFAR10 dataset we were able to obtain a relative speed-up of 33% at an marginal increase in error rate from 15.3% to 15.8%

Reconstructing directed and weighted topologies of phase-locked oscillator networks

The formalism of complex networks is extensively employed to describe the dynamics of interacting agents in several applications. The features of the connections among the nodes in a network are not always provided beforehand, hence the problem of appropriately inferring them often arises. Here, we present a method to reconstruct directed and weighted topologies (REDRAW) of networks of heterogeneous phase-locked nonlinear oscillators. We ultimately plan on using REDRAW to infer the interaction structure in human ensembles engaged in coordination tasks, and give insights into the overall behavior

The International Workshop on Osteoarthritis Imaging Knee MRI Segmentation Challenge: A Multi-Institute Evaluation and Analysis Framework on a Standardized Dataset

Purpose: To organize a knee MRI segmentation challenge for characterizing the semantic and clinical efficacy of automatic segmentation methods relevant for monitoring osteoarthritis progression. Methods: A dataset partition consisting of 3D knee MRI from 88 subjects at two timepoints with ground-truth articular (femoral, tibial, patellar) cartilage and meniscus segmentations was standardized. Challenge submissions and a majority-vote ensemble were evaluated using Dice score, average symmetric surface distance, volumetric overlap error, and coefficient of variation on a hold-out test set. Similarities in network segmentations were evaluated using pairwise Dice correlations. Articular cartilage thickness was computed per-scan and longitudinally. Correlation between thickness error and segmentation metrics was measured using Pearson's coefficient. Two empirical upper bounds for ensemble performance were computed using combinations of model outputs that consolidated true positives and true negatives. Results: Six teams (T1-T6) submitted entries for the challenge. No significant differences were observed across all segmentation metrics for all tissues (p=1.0) among the four top-performing networks (T2, T3, T4, T6). Dice correlations between network pairs were high (>0.85). Per-scan thickness errors were negligible among T1-T4 (p=0.99) and longitudinal changes showed minimal bias (<0.03mm). Low correlations (<0.41) were observed between segmentation metrics and thickness error. The majority-vote ensemble was comparable to top performing networks (p=1.0). Empirical upper bound performances were similar for both combinations (p=1.0). Conclusion: Diverse networks learned to segment the knee similarly where high segmentation accuracy did not correlate to cartilage thickness accuracy. Voting ensembles did not outperform individual networks but may help regularize individual models.Comment: Submitted to Radiology: Artificial Intelligence; Fixed typo