16 research outputs found
The history of degenerate (bipartite) extremal graph problems
This paper is a survey on Extremal Graph Theory, primarily focusing on the
case when one of the excluded graphs is bipartite. On one hand we give an
introduction to this field and also describe many important results, methods,
problems, and constructions.Comment: 97 pages, 11 figures, many problems. This is the preliminary version
of our survey presented in Erdos 100. In this version 2 only a citation was
complete
Large independent sets from local considerations
The following natural problem was raised independently by Erd\H{o}s-Hajnal
and Linial-Rabinovich in the late 80's. How large must the independence number
of a graph be whose every vertices contain an independent
set of size ? In this paper we discuss new methods to attack this problem.
The first new approach, based on bounding Ramsey numbers of certain graphs,
allows us to improve previously best lower bounds due to Linial-Rabinovich,
Erd\H{o}s-Hajnal and Alon-Sudakov. As an example, we prove that any -vertex
graph having an independent set of size among every vertices has
. This confirms a conjecture of Erd\H{o}s and
Hajnal that should be at least and brings the
exponent half-way to the best possible value of . Our second approach
deals with upper bounds. It relies on a reduction of the original question to
the following natural extremal problem. What is the minimum possible value of
the -density of a graph on vertices having no independent set of size
? This allows us to improve previous upper bounds due to Linial-Rabinovich,
Krivelevich and Kostochka-Jancey. As part of our arguments we link the problem
of Erd\H{o}s-Hajnal and Linial-Rabinovich and our new extremal -density
problem to a number of other well-studied questions. This leads to many
interesting directions for future research.Comment: 26 pages in the main body, 7 figures, 3 appendice
A survey of -boundedness
If a graph has bounded clique number, and sufficiently large chromatic
number, what can we say about its induced subgraphs? Andr\'as Gy\'arf\'as made
a number of challenging conjectures about this in the early 1980's, which have
remained open until recently; but in the last few years there has been
substantial progress. This is a survey of where we are now