Enhancing Predicate Pairing with Abstraction for Relational Verification

Relational verification is a technique that aims at proving properties that relate two different program fragments, or two different program runs. It has been shown that constrained Horn clauses (CHCs) can effectively be used for relational verification by applying a CHC transformation, called predicate pairing, which allows the CHC solver to infer relations among arguments of different predicates. In this paper we study how the effects of the predicate pairing transformation can be enhanced by using various abstract domains based on linear arithmetic (i.e., the domain of convex polyhedra and some of its subdomains) during the transformation. After presenting an algorithm for predicate pairing with abstraction, we report on the experiments we have performed on over a hundred relational verification problems by using various abstract domains. The experiments have been performed by using the VeriMAP transformation and verification system, together with the Parma Polyhedra Library (PPL) and the Z3 solver for CHCs.Comment: Pre-proceedings paper presented at the 27th International Symposium on Logic-Based Program Synthesis and Transformation (LOPSTR 2017), Namur, Belgium, 10-12 October 2017 (arXiv:1708.07854

An Algebraic Framework for Compositional Program Analysis

The purpose of a program analysis is to compute an abstract meaning for a program which approximates its dynamic behaviour. A compositional program analysis accomplishes this task with a divide-and-conquer strategy: the meaning of a program is computed by dividing it into sub-programs, computing their meaning, and then combining the results. Compositional program analyses are desirable because they can yield scalable (and easily parallelizable) program analyses. This paper presents algebraic framework for designing, implementing, and proving the correctness of compositional program analyses. A program analysis in our framework defined by an algebraic structure equipped with sequencing, choice, and iteration operations. From the analysis design perspective, a particularly interesting consequence of this is that the meaning of a loop is computed by applying the iteration operator to the loop body. This style of compositional loop analysis can yield interesting ways of computing loop invariants that cannot be defined iteratively. We identify a class of algorithms, the so-called path-expression algorithms [Tarjan1981,Scholz2007], which can be used to efficiently implement analyses in our framework. Lastly, we develop a theory for proving the correctness of an analysis by establishing an approximation relationship between an algebra defining a concrete semantics and an algebra defining an analysis.Comment: 15 page

End-to-End Translation Validation for the Halide Language

International audienceThis paper considers the correctness of domain-specific compilers for tensor programming languages through the study of Halide, a popular representative. It describes a translation validation algorithm for affine Halide specifications, independently of the scheduling language. The algorithm relies on "propheticž annotations added by the compiler to the generated array assignments. The annotations provide a refinement mapping from assignments in the generated code to the tensor definitions from the specification. Our implementation leverages an affine solver and a general SMT solver, and scales to complete Halide benchmarks

Using Relational Verification for Program Slicing

Program slicing is the process of removing statements from a program such that defined aspects of its behavior are retained. For producing precise slices, i.e., slices that are minimal in size, the program\u27s semantics must be considered. Existing approaches that go beyond a syntactical analysis and do take the semantics into account are not fully automatic and require auxiliary specifications from the user. In this paper, we adapt relational verification to check whether a slice candidate obtained by removing some instructions from a program is indeed a valid slice. Based on this, we propose a framework for precise and automatic program slicing. As part of this framework, we present three strategies for the generation of slice candidates, and we show how dynamic slicing approaches - that interweave generating and checking slice candidates - can be used for this purpose. The framework can easily be extended with other strategies for generating slice candidates. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of slicing approaches that use our framework

Self-Supervised Learning to Prove Equivalence Between Straight-Line Programs via Rewrite Rules

We target the problem of automatically synthesizing proofs of semantic equivalence between two programs made of sequences of statements. We represent programs using abstract syntax trees (AST), where a given set of semantics-preserving rewrite rules can be applied on a specific AST pattern to generate a transformed and semantically equivalent program. In our system, two programs are equivalent if there exists a sequence of application of these rewrite rules that leads to rewriting one program into the other. We propose a neural network architecture based on a transformer model to generate proofs of equivalence between program pairs. The system outputs a sequence of rewrites, and the validity of the sequence is simply checked by verifying it can be applied. If no valid sequence is produced by the neural network, the system reports the programs as non-equivalent, ensuring by design no programs may be incorrectly reported as equivalent. Our system is fully implemented for a given grammar which can represent straight-line programs with function calls and multiple types. To efficiently train the system to generate such sequences, we develop an original incremental training technique, named self-supervised sample selection. We extensively study the effectiveness of this novel training approach on proofs of increasing complexity and length. Our system, S4Eq, achieves 97% proof success on a curated dataset of 10,000 pairs of equivalent programsComment: 30 pages including appendi

Generating all polynomial invariants in simple loops

AbstractThis paper presents a method for automatically generating all polynomial invariants in simple loops. It is first shown that the set of polynomials serving as loop invariants has the algebraic structure of an ideal. Based on this connection, a fixpoint procedure using operations on ideals and Gröbner basis constructions is proposed for finding all polynomial invariants. Most importantly, it is proved that the procedure terminates in at most m+1 iterations, where m is the number of program variables. The proof relies on showing that the irreducible components of the varieties associated with the ideals generated by the procedure either remain the same or increase their dimension at every iteration of the fixpoint procedure. This yields a correct and complete algorithm for inferring conjunctions of polynomial equalities as invariants. The method has been implemented in Maple using the Groebner package. The implementation has been used to automatically discover non-trivial invariants for several examples to illustrate the power of the technique