1,091 research outputs found
On existential declarations of independence in IF Logic
We analyze the behaviour of declarations of independence between existential
quantifiers in quantifier prefixes of IF sentences; we give a syntactical
criterion for deciding whether a sentence beginning with such prefix exists
such that its truth values may be affected by removal of the declaration of
independence. We extend the result also to equilibrium semantics values for
undetermined IF sentences.
The main theorem allows us to describe the behaviour of various particular
classes of quantifier prefixes, and to prove as a remarkable corollary that all
existential IF sentences are equivalent to first-order sentences.
As a further consequence, we prove that the fragment of IF sentences with
knowledge memory has only first-order expressive power (up to truth
equivalence)
Some observations about generalized quantifiers in logics of imperfect information
We analyse the two definitions of generalized quantifiers for logics of dependence and independence that have been proposed by F. Engstrom. comparing them with a more general, higher order definition of team quantifier. We show that Engstrom's definitions (and other quantifiers from the literature) can be identified, by means of appropriate lifts, with special classes of team quantifiers. We point out that the new team quantifiers express a quantitative and a qualitative component, while Engstrom's quantifiers only range over the latter. We further argue that Engstrom's definitions are just embeddings of the first-order generalized quantifiers into team semantics. and fail to capture an adequate notion of team-theoretical generalized quantifier, save for the special cases in which the quantifiers are applied to flat formulas. We also raise several doubts concerning the meaningfulness of the monotone/nonmonotone distinction in this context. In the appendix we develop some proof theory for Engstrom's quantifiers.Peer reviewe
Decidability of predicate logics with team semantics
We study the complexity of predicate logics based on team semantics. We show
that the satisfiability problems of two-variable independence logic and
inclusion logic are both NEXPTIME-complete. Furthermore, we show that the
validity problem of two-variable dependence logic is undecidable, thereby
solving an open problem from the team semantics literature. We also briefly
analyse the complexity of the Bernays-Sch\"onfinkel-Ramsey prefix classes of
dependence logic.Comment: Extended version of a MFCS 2016 article. Changes on the earlier arXiv
version: title changed, added the result on validity of two-variable
dependence logic, restructurin
Team Semantics and Recursive Enumerability
It is well known that dependence logic captures the complexity class NP, and
it has recently been shown that inclusion logic captures P on ordered models.
These results demonstrate that team semantics offers interesting new
possibilities for descriptive complexity theory. In order to properly
understand the connection between team semantics and descriptive complexity, we
introduce an extension D* of dependence logic that can define exactly all
recursively enumerable classes of finite models. Thus D* provides an approach
to computation alternative to Turing machines. The essential novel feature in
D* is an operator that can extend the domain of the considered model by a
finite number of fresh elements. Due to the close relationship between
generalized quantifiers and oracles, we also investigate generalized
quantifiers in team semantics. We show that monotone quantifiers of type (1)
can be canonically eliminated from quantifier extensions of first-order logic
by introducing corresponding generalized dependence atoms
The Doxastic Interpretation of Team Semantics
We advance a doxastic interpretation for many of the logical connectives
considered in Dependence Logic and in its extensions, and we argue that Team
Semantics is a natural framework for reasoning about beliefs and belief
updates
Characterizing downwards closed, strongly first order, relativizable dependencies
In Team Semantics, a dependency notion is strongly first order if every
sentence of the logic obtained by adding the corresponding atoms to First Order
Logic is equivalent to some first order sentence. In this work it is shown that
all nontrivial dependency atoms that are strongly first order, downwards
closed, and relativizable (in the sense that the relativizations of the
corresponding atoms with respect to some unary predicate are expressible in
terms of them) are definable in terms of constancy atoms.
Additionally, it is shown that any strongly first order dependency is safe
for any family of downwards closed dependencies, in the sense that every
sentence of the logic obtained by adding to First Order Logic both the strongly
first order dependency and the downwards closed dependencies is equivalent to
some sentence of the logic obtained by adding only the downwards closed
dependencies
- …