30 research outputs found
Effective symbolic protocol analysis via equational irreducibility conditions
We address a problem that arises in cryptographic protocol
analysis when the equational properties of the cryptosystem are taken
into account: in many situations it is necessary to guarantee that certain
terms generated during a state exploration are in normal form with respect
to the equational theory. We give a tool-independent methodology
for state exploration, based on unification and narrowing, that generates
states that obey these irreducibility constraints, called contextual symbolic
reachability analysis, prove its soundness and completeness, and
describe its implementation in the Maude-NPA protocol analysis tool.
Contextual symbolic reachability analysis also introduces a new type of
unification mechanism, which we call asymmetric unification, in which
any solution must leave the right side of the solution irreducible. We also
present experiments showing the effectiveness of our methodology.S. Escobar and S. Santiago have been partially supported by the EU (FEDER) and
the Spanish MEC/MICINN under grant TIN 2010-21062-C02-02, and by Generalitat Valenciana PROMETEO2011/052. The following authors have been partially
supported by NSF: S. Escobar, J. Meseguer and R. Sasse under grants CCF 09-
05584, CNS 09-04749, and CNS 09-05584; D. Kapur under grant CNS 09-05222; C.
Lynch, Z. Liu, and C. Meadows under grant CNS 09-05378, and P. Narendran and
S. Erbatur under grant CNS 09-05286.Erbatur, S.; Escobar Román, S.; Kapur, D.; Liu, Z.; Lynch, C.; Meadows, C.; Meseguer, J.... (2012). Effective symbolic protocol analysis via equational irreducibility conditions. En Computer Security - ESORICS 2012. Springer Verlag (Germany). 7459:73-90. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33167-1_5S73907459IEEE 802.11 Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical (PHY) Specifications (1999)Abadi, M., Cortier, V.: Deciding knowledge in security protocols under equational theories. Theor. Comput. Sci. 367(1-2), 2–32 (2006)Arapinis, M., Bursuc, S., Ryan, M.: Privacy Supporting Cloud Computing: ConfiChair, a Case Study. In: Degano, P., Guttman, J.D. (eds.) Principles of Security and Trust. LNCS, vol. 7215, pp. 89–108. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Basin, D., Mödersheim, S., Viganò, L.: An On-the-Fly Model-Checker for Security Protocol Analysis. In: Snekkenes, E., Gollmann, D. (eds.) ESORICS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2808, pp. 253–270. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Baudet, M., Cortier, V., Delaune, S.: YAPA: A Generic Tool for Computing Intruder Knowledge. In: Treinen, R. (ed.) RTA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5595, pp. 148–163. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Blanchet, B.: An efficient cryptographic protocol verifier based on prolog rules. In: CSFW, pp. 82–96. IEEE Computer Society (2001)Blanchet, B.: Using horn clauses for analyzing security protocols. In: Cortier, V., Kremer, S. (eds.) Formal Models and Techniques for Analyzing Security Protocols. IOS Press (2011)Blanchet, B., Abadi, M., Fournet, C.: Automated verification of selected equivalences for security protocols. J. Log. Algebr. Program. 75(1), 3–51 (2008)Ciobâcă, Ş., Delaune, S., Kremer, S.: Computing Knowledge in Security Protocols under Convergent Equational Theories. In: Schmidt, R.A. (ed.) CADE-22. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5663, pp. 355–370. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Comon-Lundh, H., Delaune, S.: The Finite Variant Property: How to Get Rid of Some Algebraic Properties. In: Giesl, J. (ed.) RTA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3467, pp. 294–307. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Comon-Lundh, H., Delaune, S., Millen, J.: Constraint solving techniques and enriching the model with equational theories. In: Cortier, V., Kremer, S. (eds.) Formal Models and Techniques for Analyzing Security Protocols. Cryptology and Information Security Series, vol. 5, pp. 35–61. IOS Press (2011)Comon-Lundh, H., Shmatikov, V.: Intruder deductions, constraint solving and insecurity decision in presence of exclusive or. In: LICS, pp. 271–280. IEEE Computer Society (2003)Ciobâcă, Ş.: Knowledge in security protocolsDolev, D., Yao, A.C.-C.: On the security of public key protocols (extended abstract). In: FOCS, pp. 350–357 (1981)Escobar, S., Meadows, C., Meseguer, J.: A rewriting-based inference system for the NRL protocol analyzer and its meta-logical properties. Theoretical Computer Science 367(1-2), 162–202 (2006)Escobar, S., Meadows, C., Meseguer, J.: State Space Reduction in the Maude-NRL Protocol Analyzer. In: Jajodia, S., Lopez, J. (eds.) ESORICS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5283, pp. 548–562. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Escobar, S., Meadows, C., Meseguer, J.: Maude-NPA: Cryptographic Protocol Analysis Modulo Equational Properties. In: Aldini, A., Barthe, G., Gorrieri, R. (eds.) FOSAD 2007. LNCS, vol. 5705, pp. 1–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Escobar, S., Meadows, C., Meseguer, J., Santiago, S.: State space reduction in the maude-nrl protocol analyzer. Information and Computation (in press, 2012)Escobar, S., Sasse, R., Meseguer, J.: Folding variant narrowing and optimal variant termination. J. Log. Algebr. Program (in press, 2012)Thayer Fabrega, F.J., Herzog, J., Guttman, J.: Strand Spaces: What Makes a Security Protocol Correct? Journal of Computer Security 7, 191–230 (1999)Jouannaud, J.-P., Kirchner, H.: Completion of a set of rules modulo a set of equations. SIAM J. Comput. 15(4), 1155–1194 (1986)Küsters, R., Truderung, T.: Using ProVerif to analyze protocols with Diffie-Hellman exponentiation. In: CSF, pp. 157–171. IEEE Computer Society (2009)Küsters, R., Truderung, T.: Reducing protocol analysis with xor to the xor-free case in the horn theory based approach. Journal of Automated Reasoning 46(3-4), 325–352 (2011)Liu, Z., Lynch, C.: Efficient General Unification for XOR with Homomorphism. In: Bjørner, N., Sofronie-Stokkermans, V. (eds.) CADE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6803, pp. 407–421. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Lowe, G., Roscoe, B.: Using csp to detect errors in the tmn protocol. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 23, 659–669 (1997)Lucas, S.: Context-sensitive computations in functional and functional logic programs. J. Functl. and Log. Progr. 1(4), 446–453 (1998)Meseguer, J.: Conditional rewriting logic as a united model of concurrency. Theor. Comput. Sci. 96(1), 73–155 (1992)Meseguer, J., Thati, P.: Symbolic reachability analysis using narrowing and its application to verification of cryptographic protocols. Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation 20(1-2), 123–160 (2007)Mödersheim, S.: Models and methods for the automated analysis of security protocols. PhD thesis, ETH Zurich (2007)Mödersheim, S., Viganò, L., Basin, D.A.: Constraint differentiation: Search-space reduction for the constraint-based analysis of security protocols. Journal of Computer Security 18(4), 575–618 (2010)Tatebayashi, M., Matsuzaki, N., Newman Jr., D.B.: Key Distribution Protocol for Digital Mobile Communication Systems. In: Brassard, G. (ed.) CRYPTO 1989. LNCS, vol. 435, pp. 324–334. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)TeReSe (ed.): Term Rewriting Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)Viry, P.: Equational rules for rewriting logic. Theor. Comput. Sci. 285(2), 487–517 (2002)Zhang, H., Remy, J.-L.: Contextual Rewriting. In: Jouannaud, J.-P. (ed.) RTA 1985. LNCS, vol. 202, pp. 46–62. Springer, Heidelberg (1985
Analysis of the IBM CCA Security API Protocols in Maude-NPA
Standards for cryptographic protocols have long been attractive
candidates for formal verification. It is important that such standards
be correct, and cryptographic protocols are tricky to design and subject
to non-intuitive attacks even when the underlying cryptosystems are secure.
Thus a number of general-purpose cryptographic protocol analysis
tools have been developed and applied to protocol standards. However,
there is one class of standards, security application programming interfaces
(security APIs), to which few of these tools have been applied.
Instead, most work has concentrated on developing special-purpose tools
and algorithms for specific classes of security APIs. However, there can
be much advantage gained from having general-purpose tools that could
be applied to a wide class of problems, including security APIs.
One particular class of APIs that has proven difficult to analyze using
general-purpose tools is that involving exclusive-or. In this paper
we analyze the IBM 4758 Common Cryptographic Architecture (CCA)
protocol using an advanced automated protocol verification tool with
full exclusive-or capabilities, the Maude-NPA tool. This is the first time
that API protocols have been satisfactorily specified and analyzed in the
Maude-NPA, and the first time XOR-based APIs have been specified
and analyzed using a general-purpose unbounded session cryptographic
protocol verification tool that provides direct support for AC theories.
We describe our results and indicate what further research needs to be
done to make such protocol analysis generally effective.Antonio González-Burgueño, Sonia Santiago and Santiago Escobar have been partially supported by the EU (FEDER) and the Spanish MINECO under grants TIN 2010-21062-C02-02 and TIN 2013-45732-C4-1-P, and by Generalitat Valenciana PROMETEO2011/052. José Meseguer has been partially supported by NSF Grant CNS 13-10109.González Burgueño, A.; Santiago Pinazo, S.; Escobar Román, S.; Meadows, C.; Meseguer, J. (2014). Analysis of the IBM CCA Security API Protocols in Maude-NPA. En Security Standardisation Research. Springer International Publishing. 111-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14054-4_8S111130Abadi, M., Blanchet, B., Fournet, C.: Just fast keying in the pi calculus. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. 10(3) (2007)Blanchet, B.: An Efficient Cryptographic Protocol Verifier Based on Prolog Rules. In: 14th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW 2014), Cape Breton, Nova Scotia, Canada, June 2001, pp. 82–96. IEEE Computer Society (2014)Bond, M.: Attacks on cryptoprocessor transaction sets. In: Koç, Ç.K., Naccache, D., Paar, C. (eds.) CHES 2001. LNCS, vol. 2162, pp. 220–234. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)Butler, F., Cervesato, I., Jaggard, A.D., Scedrov, A.: A formal analysis of some properties of kerberos 5 using msr. In: CSFW, pp. 175–1790. IEEE Computer Society (2002)Cachin, C., Chandran, N.: A secure cryptographic token interface. In: Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE Computer Security Foundations Symposium, CSF 2009, Port Jefferson, New York, USA, July 8-10, pp. 141–153 (2009)Chevalier, Y., Küsters, R., Rusinowitch, M., Turuani, M.: An NP decision procedure for protocol insecurity with XOR. In: 18th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS 2003 (2003)Comon-Lundh, H., Shmatikov, V.: Intruder deductions, constraint solving and insecurity decision in presence of exclusive-or. In: 18th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS 2003), pp. 271–280 (2003)Comon-Lundh, H., Cortier, V.: New decidability results for fragments of first-order logic and application to cryptographic protocols. In: Nieuwenhuis, R. (ed.) RTA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2706, pp. 148–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Cortier, V., Keighren, G., Steel, G.: Automatic analysis of the aecurity of XOR-based key management schemes. In: Grumberg, O., Huth, M. (eds.) TACAS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4424, pp. 538–552. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Cortier, V., Steel, G.: A generic security API for symmetric key management on cryptographic devices. In: Backes, M., Ning, P. (eds.) ESORICS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5789, pp. 605–620. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Erbatur, S., et al.: Effective Symbolic Protocol Analysis via Equational Irreducibility Conditions. In: Foresti, S., Yung, M., Martinelli, F. (eds.) ESORICS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7459, pp. 73–90. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Escobar, S., Meadows, C., Meseguer, J.: Maude-NPA: Cryptographic Protocol Analysis Modulo Equational Properties. In: Aldini, A., Barthe, G., Gorrieri, R. (eds.) FOSAD 2007/2008/2009. LNCS, vol. 5705, pp. 1–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Escobar, S., Meadows, C., Meseguer, J., Santiago, S.: Sequential Protocol Composition in Maude-NPA. In: Gritzalis, D., Preneel, B., Theoharidou, M. (eds.) ESORICS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6345, pp. 303–318. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Thayer Fabrega, F.J., Herzog, J., Guttman, J.: Strand Spaces: What Makes a Security Protocol Correct? Journal of Computer Security 7, 191–230 (1999)González-Burgueño, A.: Protocol Analysis Modulo Exclusive-Or Theories: A Case study in Maude-NPA. Master’s thesis, Universitat Politècnica de València (March 2014), https://angonbur.webs.upv.es/Previous_work/Master_Thesis.pdfIBM. Comment on Mike’s Bond paper A Chosen Key Difference Attack on Control Vectors (2001), http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mkb23/research/CVDif-Response.pdfIBM. CCA basic services reference and guide: CCA basic services reference and guide for the IBM 4758 PCI and IBM 4764 (2001), http://www-03.ibm.com/security/cryptocards/pdfs/bs327.pdf.2008Keighren, G.: Model Checking IBM’s Common Cryptographic Architecture API. Technical Report 862, University of Edinburgh (October 2006)Kemmerer, R.A.: Using formal verification techniques to analyze encryption protocols. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 134–139. IEEE Computer Society (1987)Küsters, R., Truderung, T.: Reducing protocol analysis with xor to the xor-free case in the horn theory based approach. J. Autom. Reasoning 46(3-4), 325–352 (2011)Linn, J.: Generic security service application program interface version 2, update 1. IETF RFC 2743 (2000), https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc2743Longley, D., Rigby, S.: An automatic search for security flaws in key management schemes. Computers & Security 11(1), 75–89 (1992)Meadows, C.: Applying formal methods to the analysis of a key management protocol. Journal of Computer Security 1(1) (1992)Meadows, C.: The NRL protocol analyzer: An overview. Journal of Logic Programming 26(2), 113–131 (1996)Meadows, C., Cervesato, I., Syverson, P.: Specification and Analysis of the Group Domain of Interpretation Protocol using NPATRL and the NRL Protocol Analyzer. Journal of Computer Security 12(6), 893–932 (2004)Meadows, C.: Analysis of the internet key exchange protocol using the nrl protocol analyzer. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 216–231. IEEE Computer Society (1999)Meier, S., Schmidt, B., Cremers, C., Basin, D.: The TAMARIN prover for the symbolic snalysis of security protocols. In: Sharygina, N., Veith, H. (eds.) CAV 2013. LNCS, vol. 8044, pp. 696–701. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Mukhamedov, A., Gordon, A.D., Ryan, M.: Towards a verified reference implementation of a trusted platform module. In: Christianson, B., Malcolm, J.A., Matyáš, V., Roe, M. (eds.) Security Protocols 2009. LNCS, vol. 7028, pp. 69–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)National Institute of Standards and Technology. FIPS PUB 46-3: Data Encryption Standard (DES), supersedes FIPS 46-2 (October 1999)Nieuwenhuis, R. (ed.): CADE 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3632. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Steel, G.: Deduction with xor constraints in security api modelling. In: Nieuwenhuis (ed.) [30], pp. 322–336Verma, K.N., Seidl, H., Schwentick, T.: On the complexity of equational horn clauses. In: Nieuwenhuis (ed.) [30], pp. 337–35
Advanced Features in Protocol Verification: Theory, Properties, and Efficiency in Maude-NPA
The area of formal analysis of cryptographic protocols has been an active
one since the mid 80’s. The idea is to verify communication protocols
that use encryption to guarantee secrecy and that use authentication of
data to ensure security. Formal methods are used in protocol analysis to
provide formal proofs of security, and to uncover bugs and security flaws
that in some cases had remained unknown long after the original protocol
publication, such as the case of the well known Needham-Schroeder
Public Key (NSPK) protocol. In this thesis we tackle problems regarding
the three main pillars of protocol verification: modelling capabilities,
verifiable properties, and efficiency.
This thesis is devoted to investigate advanced features in the analysis
of cryptographic protocols tailored to the Maude-NPA tool. This tool
is a model-checker for cryptographic protocol analysis that allows for
the incorporation of different equational theories and operates in the
unbounded session model without the use of data or control abstraction.
An important contribution of this thesis is relative to theoretical aspects
of protocol verification in Maude-NPA. First, we define a forwards
operational semantics, using rewriting logic as the theoretical framework
and the Maude programming language as tool support. This is the first
time that a forwards rewriting-based semantics is given for Maude-NPA.
Second, we also study the problem that arises in cryptographic protocol
analysis when it is necessary to guarantee that certain terms generated
during a state exploration are in normal form with respect to the protocol
equational theory.
We also study techniques to extend Maude-NPA capabilities to support
the verification of a wider class of protocols and security properties.
First, we present a framework to specify and verify sequential protocol
compositions in which one or more child protocols make use of information obtained from running a parent protocol. Second, we present a
theoretical framework to specify and verify protocol indistinguishability
in Maude-NPA. This kind of properties aim to verify that an attacker
cannot distinguish between two versions of a protocol: for example, one
using one secret and one using another, as it happens in electronic voting
protocols.
Finally, this thesis contributes to improve the efficiency of protocol
verification in Maude-NPA. We define several techniques which drastically
reduce the state space, and can often yield a finite state space,
so that whether the desired security property holds or not can in fact
be decided automatically, in spite of the general undecidability of such
problems.Santiago Pinazo, S. (2015). Advanced Features in Protocol Verification: Theory, Properties, and Efficiency in Maude-NPA [Tesis doctoral no publicada]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/4852
Protocol analysis modulo exclusive-or theories: a case study in Maude-MPA
[EN] Escobar of the Universitat Politècnica de València in collaboration with José Meseguer (University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA) and Catherine Meadows (Naval Research Lab, Washington, DC,
USA). We focus on protocols using exclusive-or as the only cryptographic properties of symbols, apart
of the standard cancellation of encryption and decryption. The protocols analyzed in this document are
borrowed from the paper ”Reducing Protocol Analysis with XOR to the XOR- Free Case in the Horn
Theory Based Approach” by Ralf Küesters and Tomasz Truderung published in Journal of Automated
Reasoning, volume 46, pages 325-352, Springer 2011. These protocols are divided into two groups,
those that can be specified in the Alice-Bob notation and those corresponding to an Application
Programming Interface (API). We have proved the same security properties described in Küesters and
Truderung paper, but we go beyond that paper in the sense that we have provided protocol
specifications that meet all the requirements of the original protocols, whereas Küesters and Truderung
paper use simplified versions of these protocols.
The main problem that we have encountered is to specify API protocols in Maude-NPA, since this was
the first time that this kind of protocols were specified in the tool. Another contribution of this thesis is
to confirm that protocols with exclusive-or can be verified in Maude-NPA[ES] El desarrollo de esta tesis final de máster tiene como objetivo verificar diversos protocolos de
seguridad existentes utilizando una herramienta de verificación automatizada de protocolos, Maude-
NPA, desarrollada por Santiago Escobar, de la Universitat Politècnica de València , en colaboración con
José Meseguer (Universidad de Illinois en Urbana- Champaign, EE.UU.) y Catherine Meadows (Naval
Research Lab , Washington , DC, EE.UU.). Nos centramos en el uso de protocolos con el operador orexclusivo
como propiedad principal criptográfica de símbolos, así como la cancelación estándar de
cifrado y descifrado. Los protocolos analizados en esta tesis los tomamos del artículo ”Reducing
Protocol Analysis with XOR to the XOR- Free Case in the Horn Theory Based Approach” de Ralf
Küesters y Tomasz Truderung publicado en el “Journal of Automated Reasoning”, volumen 46, páginas
325-352 en el 2011 en Springer. Estos protocolos se dividen en dos grupos, los que se pueden
especificar en la notación Alice-Bob y los correspondientes a una interfaz de programación de
aplicaciones (API) . Hemos probado las mismas propiedades de seguridad descritas en el artículo de
Ralf Küesters y Tomasz Truderung , pero yendo más allá, en el sentido de que hemos proporcionado
las especificaciones de los protocolos que cumplen con todos los requisitos de los protocolos originales
, mientras que en el artículo de Ralf Küesters y Tomasz Truderung utilizan versiones simplificadas de
estos protocolos.
El principal problema que nos hemos encontrado al especificar los protocolos API, es que esta fue la
primera vez que este tipo de protocolos se especificó en Maude-NPA. Otra aportación de esta tesis es
la confirmación de que los “protocolos or-exclusivos” pueden ser verificados en Maude-NPA .González Burgueño, A. (2014). Protocol analysis modulo exclusive-or theories: a case study in Maude-MPA. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/51784Archivo delegad