Safe abstractions of data encodings in formal security protocol models

When using formal methods, security protocols are usually modeled at a high level of abstraction. In particular, data encoding and decoding transformations are often abstracted away. However, if no assumptions at all are made on the behavior of such transformations, they could trivially lead to security faults, for example leaking secrets or breaking freshness by collapsing nonces into constants. In order to address this issue, this paper formally states sufficient conditions, checkable on sequential code, such that if an abstract protocol model is secure under a Dolev-Yao adversary, then a refined model, which takes into account a wide class of possible implementations of the encoding/decoding operations, is implied to be secure too under the same adversary model. The paper also indicates possible exploitations of this result in the context of methods based on formal model extraction from implementation code and of methods based on automated code generation from formally verified model

Symbolically Analyzing Security Protocols Using Tamarin

During the last three decades, there has been considerable research devoted to the symbolic analysis of security protocols and existing tools have had considerable success both in detecting attacks on protocols and showing their absence. Nevertheless, there is still a large discrepancy between the symbolic models that one specifies on paper and the models that can be effectively analyzed by tools. In this paper, we present the Tamarin prover for the symbolic analysis of security protocols. Tamarin takes as input a security protocol model, specifying the actions taken by the agents running the protocol in different roles (e.g., the protocol initiator, the responder, and the trusted key server), a specification of the adversary, and a specification of the protocol’s desired properties. Tamarin can then be used to automatically construct a proof that the protocol fulfills its specified properties, even when arbitrarily many instances of the protocol’s roles are interleaved in parallel, together with the actions of the adversary

Unification modulo a 2-sorted Equational theory for Cipher-Decipher Block Chaining

We investigate unification problems related to the Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) mode of encryption. We first model chaining in terms of a simple, convergent, rewrite system over a signature with two disjoint sorts: list and element. By interpreting a particular symbol of this signature suitably, the rewrite system can model several practical situations of interest. An inference procedure is presented for deciding the unification problem modulo this rewrite system. The procedure is modular in the following sense: any given problem is handled by a system of `list-inferences', and the set of equations thus derived between the element-terms of the problem is then handed over to any (`black-box') procedure which is complete for solving these element-equations. An example of application of this unification procedure is given, as attack detection on a Needham-Schroeder like protocol, employing the CBC encryption mode based on the associative-commutative (AC) operator XOR. The 2-sorted convergent rewrite system is then extended into one that fully captures a block chaining encryption-decryption mode at an abstract level, using no AC-symbols; and unification modulo this extended system is also shown to be decidable.Comment: 26 page

A Security Verification Framework of Cryptographic Protocols Using Machine Learning

We propose a security verification framework for cryptographic protocols using machine learning. In recent years, as cryptographic protocols have become more complex, research on automatic verification techniques has been focused on. The main technique is formal verification. However, the formal verification has two problems: it requires a large amount of computational time and does not guarantee decidability. We propose a method that allows security verification with computational time on the order of linear with respect to the size of the protocol using machine learning. In training machine learning models for security verification of cryptographic protocols, a sufficient amount of data, i.e., a set of protocol data with security labels, is difficult to collect from academic papers and other sources. To overcome this issue, we propose a way to create arbitrarily large datasets by automatically generating random protocols and assigning security labels to them using formal verification tools. Furthermore, to exploit structural features of protocols, we construct a neural network that processes a protocol along its series and tree structures. We evaluate the proposed method by applying it to verification of practical cryptographic protocols.Comment: 14 pages, 5 figure

Typed logics with states

The paper presents a simple format for typed logics with states by adding a function for register update to standard typed lambda calculus. It is shown that universal validity of equality for this extended language is decidable (extending a well-known result of Friedman for typed lambda calculus). This system is next extended to a full fledged typed dynamic logic, and it is illustrated how the resulting format allows for very simple and intuitive representations of dynamic semantics for natural language and denotational semantics for imperative programming. The proposal is compared with some alternative approaches to formulating typed versions of dynamic logics

Strand Spaces with Choice via a Process Algebra Semantics

Roles in cryptographic protocols do not always have a linear execution, but may include choice points causing the protocol to continue along different paths. In this paper we address the problem of representing choice in the strand space model of cryptographic protocols, particularly as it is used in the Maude-NPA cryptographic protocol analysis tool. To achieve this goal, we develop and give formal semantics to a process algebra for cryptographic protocols that supports a rich taxonomy of choice primitives for composing strand spaces. In our taxonomy, deterministic and non-deterministic choices are broken down further. Non-deterministic choice can be either explicit, i.e., one of two paths is chosen, or implicit, i.e. the value of a variable is chosen non-deterministically. Likewise, deterministic choice can be either an (explicit) if-then-else choice, i.e. one path is chosen if a predicate is satisfied, while the other is chosen if it is not, or implicit deterministic choice, i.e. execution continues only if a certain pattern is matched. We have identified a class of choices which includes finite branching and some cases of infinite branching, which we address in this paper. Our main theoretical results are two bisimulation results: one proving that the formal semantics of our process algebra is bisimilar to the forwards execution semantics of its associated strands, and another showing that it is also bisimilar with respect to the symbolic backwards semantics of the strands such as that supported by Maude-NPA. At the practical level, we present a prototype implementation of our process algebra in Maude-NPA, illustrate its expressive power and naturalness with various examples, and show how it can be effectively used in formal analysis.Partially supported by NSF grant CNS-131910Partially supported by the EU (FEDER) and the Spanish MINECO under grants TIN 2015-69175-C4-1-R and TIN 2013-45732-C4-1-PParitally supported by Generalitat Valenciana under grant PROME- TEOII/2015/013.Ope

Formal Verification of Security Protocol Implementations: A Survey

Automated formal verification of security protocols has been mostly focused on analyzing high-level abstract models which, however, are significantly different from real protocol implementations written in programming languages. Recently, some researchers have started investigating techniques that bring automated formal proofs closer to real implementations. This paper surveys these attempts, focusing on approaches that target the application code that implements protocol logic, rather than the libraries that implement cryptography. According to these approaches, libraries are assumed to correctly implement some models. The aim is to derive formal proofs that, under this assumption, give assurance about the application code that implements the protocol logic. The two main approaches of model extraction and code generation are presented, along with the main techniques adopted for each approac