517 research outputs found
On the stability of generalized second price auctions with budgets
The Generalized Second Price (GSP) auction used typically to model sponsored search auctions does not include the notion of budget constraints, which is present in practice. Motivated by this, we introduce the different variants of GSP auctions that take budgets into account in natural ways. We examine their stability by focusing on the existence of Nash equilibria and envy-free assignments. We highlight the differences between these mechanisms and find that only some of them exhibit both notions of stability. This shows the importance of carefully picking the right mechanism to ensure stable outcomes in the presence of budgets.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft
Pricing Ad Slots with Consecutive Multi-unit Demand
We consider the optimal pricing problem for a model of the rich media
advertisement market, as well as other related applications. In this market,
there are multiple buyers (advertisers), and items (slots) that are arranged in
a line such as a banner on a website. Each buyer desires a particular number of
{\em consecutive} slots and has a per-unit-quality value (dependent on
the ad only) while each slot has a quality (dependent on the position
only such as click-through rate in position auctions). Hence, the valuation of
the buyer for item is . We want to decide the allocations and
the prices in order to maximize the total revenue of the market maker.
A key difference from the traditional position auction is the advertiser's
requirement of a fixed number of consecutive slots. Consecutive slots may be
needed for a large size rich media ad. We study three major pricing mechanisms,
the Bayesian pricing model, the maximum revenue market equilibrium model and an
envy-free solution model. Under the Bayesian model, we design a polynomial time
computable truthful mechanism which is optimum in revenue. For the market
equilibrium paradigm, we find a polynomial time algorithm to obtain the maximum
revenue market equilibrium solution. In envy-free settings, an optimal solution
is presented when the buyers have the same demand for the number of consecutive
slots. We conduct a simulation that compares the revenues from the above
schemes and gives convincing results.Comment: 27page
Sponsored Search, Market Equilibria, and the Hungarian Method
Matching markets play a prominent role in economic theory. A prime example of
such a market is the sponsored search market. Here, as in other markets of that
kind, market equilibria correspond to feasible, envy free, and bidder optimal
outcomes. For settings without budgets such an outcome always exists and can be
computed in polynomial-time by the so-called Hungarian Method. Moreover, every
mechanism that computes such an outcome is incentive compatible. We show that
the Hungarian Method can be modified so that it finds a feasible, envy free,
and bidder optimal outcome for settings with budgets. We also show that in
settings with budgets no mechanism that computes such an outcome can be
incentive compatible for all inputs. For inputs in general position, however,
the presented mechanism---as any other mechanism that computes such an outcome
for settings with budgets---is incentive compatible
On Revenue Maximization with Sharp Multi-Unit Demands
We consider markets consisting of a set of indivisible items, and buyers that
have {\em sharp} multi-unit demand. This means that each buyer wants a
specific number of items; a bundle of size less than has no value,
while a bundle of size greater than is worth no more than the most valued
items (valuations being additive). We consider the objective of setting
prices and allocations in order to maximize the total revenue of the market
maker. The pricing problem with sharp multi-unit demand buyers has a number of
properties that the unit-demand model does not possess, and is an important
question in algorithmic pricing. We consider the problem of computing a revenue
maximizing solution for two solution concepts: competitive equilibrium and
envy-free pricing.
For unrestricted valuations, these problems are NP-complete; we focus on a
realistic special case of "correlated values" where each buyer has a
valuation v_i\qual_j for item , where and \qual_j are positive
quantities associated with buyer and item respectively. We present a
polynomial time algorithm to solve the revenue-maximizing competitive
equilibrium problem. For envy-free pricing, if the demand of each buyer is
bounded by a constant, a revenue maximizing solution can be found efficiently;
the general demand case is shown to be NP-hard.Comment: page2
Reservation Exchange Markets for Internet Advertising
Internet display advertising industry follows two main business models. One model is based on direct deals between publishers and advertisers where they sign legal contracts containing terms of fulfillment for a future inventory. The second model is a spot market based on auctioning page views in real-time on advertising exchange (AdX) platforms such as DoubleClick\u27s Ad Exchange, RightMedia, or AppNexus. These exchanges play the role of intermediaries who sell items (e.g. page-views) on behalf of a seller (e.g. a publisher) to buyers (e.g., advertisers) on the opposite side of the market. The computational and economics issues arising in this second model have been extensively investigated in recent times.
In this work, we consider a third emerging model called reservation exchange market. A reservation exchange is a two-sided market between buyer orders for blocks of advertisers\u27 impressions and seller orders for blocks of publishers\u27 page views. The goal is to match seller orders to buyer orders while providing the right incentives to both sides. In this work we first describe the important features of mechanisms for efficient reservation exchange markets. We then address the algorithmic problems of designing revenue sharing schemes to provide a fair division between sellers of the revenue collected from buyers.
A major conceptual contribution of this work is in showing that even though both clinching ascending auctions and VCG mechanisms achieve the same outcome from a buyer perspective, however, from the perspective of revenue sharing among sellers, clinching ascending auctions are much more informative than VCG auctions
On the stability of generalized second price auctions with budgets
The Generalized Second Price (GSP) auction used typically to model sponsored search auctions does not include the notion of budget constraints, which is present in practice. Motivated by this, we introduce the different variants of GSP auctions that take budgets into account in natural ways. We examine their stability by focusing on the existence of Nash equilibria and envy-free assignments. We highlight the differences between these mechanisms and find that only some of them exhibit both notions of stability. This shows the importance of carefully picking the right mechanism to ensure stable outcomes in the presence of budgets.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author’s final draft
Ascending auctions and Walrasian equilibrium
We present a family of submodular valuation classes that generalizes gross
substitute. We show that Walrasian equilibrium always exist for one class in
this family, and there is a natural ascending auction which finds it. We prove
some new structural properties on gross-substitute auctions which, in turn,
show that the known ascending auctions for this class (Gul-Stacchetti and
Ausbel) are, in fact, identical. We generalize these two auctions, and provide
a simple proof that they terminate in a Walrasian equilibrium
- …