19,745 research outputs found
Envy Freedom and Prior-free Mechanism Design
We consider the provision of an abstract service to single-dimensional
agents. Our model includes position auctions, single-minded combinatorial
auctions, and constrained matching markets. When the agents' values are drawn
from a distribution, the Bayesian optimal mechanism is given by Myerson (1981)
as a virtual-surplus optimizer. We develop a framework for prior-free mechanism
design and analysis. A good mechanism in our framework approximates the optimal
mechanism for the distribution if there is a distribution; moreover, when there
is no distribution this mechanism still performs well.
We define and characterize optimal envy-free outcomes in symmetric
single-dimensional environments. Our characterization mirrors Myerson's theory.
Furthermore, unlike in mechanism design where there is no point-wise optimal
mechanism, there is always a point-wise optimal envy-free outcome.
Envy-free outcomes and incentive-compatible mechanisms are similar in
structure and performance. We therefore use the optimal envy-free revenue as a
benchmark for measuring the performance of a prior-free mechanism. A good
mechanism is one that approximates the envy free benchmark on any profile of
agent values. We show that good mechanisms exist, and in particular, a natural
generalization of the random sampling auction of Goldberg et al. (2001) is a
constant approximation
Core-competitive Auctions
One of the major drawbacks of the celebrated VCG auction is its low (or zero)
revenue even when the agents have high value for the goods and a {\em
competitive} outcome could have generated a significant revenue. A competitive
outcome is one for which it is impossible for the seller and a subset of buyers
to `block' the auction by defecting and negotiating an outcome with higher
payoffs for themselves. This corresponds to the well-known concept of {\em
core} in cooperative game theory.
In particular, VCG revenue is known to be not competitive when the goods
being sold have complementarities. A bottleneck here is an impossibility result
showing that there is no auction that simultaneously achieves competitive
prices (a core outcome) and incentive-compatibility.
In this paper we try to overcome the above impossibility result by asking the
following natural question: is it possible to design an incentive-compatible
auction whose revenue is comparable (even if less) to a competitive outcome?
Towards this, we define a notion of {\em core-competitive} auctions. We say
that an incentive-compatible auction is -core-competitive if its
revenue is at least fraction of the minimum revenue of a
core-outcome. We study the Text-and-Image setting. In this setting, there is an
ad slot which can be filled with either a single image ad or text ads. We
design an core-competitive randomized auction and an
competitive deterministic auction for the Text-and-Image
setting. We also show that both factors are tight
The Paradoxical Effects of Blockchain Technology on Social Networking Practices
Blockchain technology is a promising, yet not well understood, enabler of large-scale societal and economic change. For instance, blockchain makes it possible for users to securely and profitably share content on social media platforms. In this study, w
Optimal Competitive Auctions
We study the design of truthful auctions for selling identical items in
unlimited supply (e.g., digital goods) to n unit demand buyers. This classic
problem stands out from profit-maximizing auction design literature as it
requires no probabilistic assumptions on buyers' valuations and employs the
framework of competitive analysis. Our objective is to optimize the worst-case
performance of an auction, measured by the ratio between a given benchmark and
revenue generated by the auction.
We establish a sufficient and necessary condition that characterizes
competitive ratios for all monotone benchmarks. The characterization identifies
the worst-case distribution of instances and reveals intrinsic relations
between competitive ratios and benchmarks in the competitive analysis. With the
characterization at hand, we show optimal competitive auctions for two natural
benchmarks.
The most well-studied benchmark measures the
envy-free optimal revenue where at least two buyers win. Goldberg et al. [13]
showed a sequence of lower bounds on the competitive ratio for each number of
buyers n. They conjectured that all these bounds are tight. We show that
optimal competitive auctions match these bounds. Thus, we confirm the
conjecture and settle a central open problem in the design of digital goods
auctions. As one more application we examine another economically meaningful
benchmark, which measures the optimal revenue across all limited-supply Vickrey
auctions. We identify the optimal competitive ratios to be
for each number of buyers n, that is as
approaches infinity
Prior-Independent Mechanisms for Scheduling
We study the makespan minimization problem with unrelated selfish machines
under the assumption that job sizes are stochastic. We design simple truthful
mechanisms that under various distributional assumptions provide constant and
sublogarithmic approximations to expected makespan. Our mechanisms are
prior-independent in that they do not rely on knowledge of the job size
distributions. Prior-independent approximation mechanisms have been previously
studied for the objective of revenue maximization [Dhangwatnotai, Roughgarden
and Yan'10, Devanur, Hartline, Karlin and Nguyen'11, Roughgarden, Talgam-Cohen
and Yan'12]. In contrast to our results, in prior-free settings no truthful
anonymous deterministic mechanism for the makespan objective can provide a
sublinear approximation [Ashlagi, Dobzinski and Lavi'09].Comment: This paper will appear in Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Theory
of Computing 2013 (STOC'13
Are Property Rights Relevant for Development Economics? On the Dangers of Western Constructivism.
Although the importance of property rights as the engine of growth remains beyond dispute, this article tries to show that the crucial issue is not so much the definition of the allegedly ‘optimal’ property right system, as the understanding of the ideological elements that justify property rights in the first place – entrepreneurship and self-responsibility. Unless one clearly perceives the nature of the ideological structure that legitimises the rules of the game in a given society, it is virtually impossible to understand why growth-conducive property-right systems fail to emerge and be accepted. Put differently, property rights are certainly necessary for growth. But they are no tools for policy-making. Getting them right – or transferring them from other contexts - is not enough, especially if their assignment and enforcement remains a top-down process, whereby local politicians or international technocrats suggest and enforce institutional arrangements experienced elsewhere.
- …