1,283 research outputs found

    Entropic analysis of the role of words in literary texts

    Full text link
    Beyond the local constraints imposed by grammar, words concatenated in long sequences carrying a complex message show statistical regularities that may reflect their linguistic role in the message. In this paper, we perform a systematic statistical analysis of the use of words in literary English corpora. We show that there is a quantitative relation between the role of content words in literary English and the Shannon information entropy defined over an appropriate probability distribution. Without assuming any previous knowledge about the syntactic structure of language, we are able to cluster certain groups of words according to their specific role in the text.Comment: 9 pages, 5 figure

    Literary Acoustics

    Get PDF
    Bringing together sound studies and intermediality theory, this essay revisits the notion of ‘literary acoustics’ to inquire into the usefulness of intermediality studies for analyzing the relations between literature and sound. The second part of the essay is dedicated to an illustrative analysis of Ben Marcus’s highly experimental, noisy book The Age of Wire and String

    Translation and the Arrow of Time

    Get PDF

    Dating Victorians: an experimental approach to stylochronometry

    Get PDF
    A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ofthe University of LutonThe writing style of a number of authors writing in English was empirically investigated for the purpose of detecting stylistic patterns in relation to advancing age. The aim was to identify the type of stylistic markers among lexical, syntactical, phonemic, entropic, character-based, and content ones that would be most able to discriminate between early, middle, and late works of the selected authors, and the best classification or prediction algorithm most suited for this task. Two pilot studies were initially conducted. The first one concentrated on Christina Georgina Rossetti and Edgar Allan Poe from whom personal letters and poetry were selected as the genres of study, along with a limited selection of variables. Results suggested that authors and genre vary inconsistently. The second pilot study was based on Shakespeare's plays using a wider selection of variables to assess their discriminating power in relation to a past study. It was observed that the selected variables were of satisfactory predictive power, hence judged suitable for the task. Subsequently, four experiments were conducted using the variables tested in the second pilot study and personal correspondence and poetry from two additional authors, Edna St Vincent Millay and William Butler Yeats. Stepwise multiple linear regression and regression trees were selected to deal with the first two prediction experiments, and ordinal logistic regression and artificial neural networks for two classification experiments. The first experiment revealed inconsistency in accuracy of prediction and total number of variables in the final models affected by differences in authorship and genre. The second experiment revealed inconsistencies for the same factors in terms of accuracy only. The third experiment showed total number of variables in the model and error in the final model to be affected in various degrees by authorship, genre, different variable types and order in which the variables had been calculated. The last experiment had all measurements affected by the four factors. Examination of whether differences in method within each task play an important part revealed significant influences of method, authorship, and genre for the prediction problems, whereas all factors including method and various interactions dominated in the classification problems. Given the current data and methods used, as well as the results obtained, generalizable conclusions for the wider author population have been avoided

    In Limbo, or, The Protracted Death of the Novel: William Gaddis’s J R and the Precarious State of Postmodern Literature

    Get PDF
    Postponed access: the file will be accessible after 2021-05-15Eksperimentell postmodernistisk litteratur blir framleis mĂžtt med skepsis og skuldingar om irrelevans, ogsĂ„ av tonegjevande litteraturkritikarar som Fredric Jameson, som rangerer litteratur under resterande kunstarter i postmoderniteten. Denne masteroppgĂ„va tek for seg dei sĂŠreigne kvalitetane til eksperimentell postmodernistisk litteratur med utgangspunkt i romanen J R (1975) av William Gaddis. Denne romanen sĂŠrmerkast av Ă„ vĂŠre skriven som ein samanhengande dialog, med berre sjeldne innslag av ei narrativ stemme som att pĂ„ til forsĂžmer den tradisjonelle deskriptive rolla til fordel for Ă„ berre vĂŠre endĂ„ ei stemme i samtalemylderet. Dette gjenspeiler Jean-François Lyotards idear om den aukande ugyldigheita til metanarrativ. Med omsyn til dette illustrerer J R korleis romanen, som pĂ„ det mest konservative presenterast i form av eit strukturert narrativ formidla av ein allvitande forteljar, kan fornyast til auka fleksibilitet for Ă„ holde relevans ved lag i postmoderniteten. Ved Ă„ presentere teksten sĂ„ upartisk som mogleg, opnar den seg for ei rekke tolkingar slik at lesaren bidrar til kunstverkets skaparhandling. Lesehandlinga, som i dei mest tradisjonelle tilfella er ei passiv oppleving der forfattaren formidlar eit fullbyrda produkt til lesaren, skiftast her ut med ein dialektisk, aktiv prosess der lesaren og teksta inngĂ„r i eit gjensidig forhold. Vidare opnar den ekskluderande autoriteten til ei narrativ stemme for at mindre narrativ i teksten kan nĂŠrstuderast, mens stĂžrre, meir eksplisitte narrativ kan sidestillast, ettersom dialogen ofte bestĂ„r av lange, tilsynelatande trivielle tema. SjĂžlve oppgĂ„va er delt inn i fire deler. FĂžrste del giv ein oversikt over romanens kontekst, postmodernistiske preg og narratologiske sĂŠrtrekk. Andre del tek for seg entropi, eit dominerande tema i romanen, samt dei ekstralitterĂŠre implikasjonane dette inneberer. Tredje del tek for seg dei filmatiske parallellane i romanen. Fjerde del tek for seg den singulĂŠre posisjonen til J R i litteraturhistoria; til tross for at Gaddis i aukande grad blir betrakta som ein av dei leiande postmodernistiske forfattarane, har han aldri fĂ„tt merksemd hos eit stĂžrre publikum utanom akademiske kretsar i motsetning til forfattarar som Don DeLillo og Thomas Pynchon. Eg vil derfor undersĂžke arven etter J R, om der er nokon, og parallellane mellom J R og Pynchons hovudverk, Gravity’s Rainbow (1973). SjĂžlv om J R tilbyr eit alternativ til den dominerande romanstilen, kan det vĂŠre at romanen berre er eit unntak til regelen, noko som understrekast av romanens avgrensa lesekrets og den snarare indirekte enn direkte innverknaden til Gaddis.Engelsk mastergradsoppgĂ„veMAHF-LÆFRMAHF-ENGENG35
    • 

    corecore