Machine Learning in Wireless Sensor Networks: Algorithms, Strategies, and Applications

Wireless sensor networks monitor dynamic environments that change rapidly over time. This dynamic behavior is either caused by external factors or initiated by the system designers themselves. To adapt to such conditions, sensor networks often adopt machine learning techniques to eliminate the need for unnecessary redesign. Machine learning also inspires many practical solutions that maximize resource utilization and prolong the lifespan of the network. In this paper, we present an extensive literature review over the period 2002-2013 of machine learning methods that were used to address common issues in wireless sensor networks (WSNs). The advantages and disadvantages of each proposed algorithm are evaluated against the corresponding problem. We also provide a comparative guide to aid WSN designers in developing suitable machine learning solutions for their specific application challenges.Comment: Accepted for publication in IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorial

Thirty Years of Machine Learning: The Road to Pareto-Optimal Wireless Networks

Future wireless networks have a substantial potential in terms of supporting a broad range of complex compelling applications both in military and civilian fields, where the users are able to enjoy high-rate, low-latency, low-cost and reliable information services. Achieving this ambitious goal requires new radio techniques for adaptive learning and intelligent decision making because of the complex heterogeneous nature of the network structures and wireless services. Machine learning (ML) algorithms have great success in supporting big data analytics, efficient parameter estimation and interactive decision making. Hence, in this article, we review the thirty-year history of ML by elaborating on supervised learning, unsupervised learning, reinforcement learning and deep learning. Furthermore, we investigate their employment in the compelling applications of wireless networks, including heterogeneous networks (HetNets), cognitive radios (CR), Internet of things (IoT), machine to machine networks (M2M), and so on. This article aims for assisting the readers in clarifying the motivation and methodology of the various ML algorithms, so as to invoke them for hitherto unexplored services as well as scenarios of future wireless networks.Comment: 46 pages, 22 fig

Social Network Analysis Based Localization Technique with Clustered Closeness Centrality for 3D Wireless Sensor Networks

[EN] In this paper, we proposed a new wireless localization technique based on the ideology of social network analysis (SNA), to study the different properties of networks as a graph. Centrality is a main concept in SNA, so we propose using closeness centrality (CC) as a measurement to denote the importance of the node inside the network due to its geo-location to others. The node with highest degree of CC is chosen as a cluster heads, then each cluster head can form its trilateration process to collect data from its cluster. The selection of closest cluster based on CC values, and the unknown node's location can be estimated through the trilateration process. To form a perfect trilateration, the cluster head chooses three anchor nodes. The proposed algorithm provides high accuracy even in different network topologies like concave shape, O shape, and C shape as compared to existing received signal strength indicator (RSSI) techniques. Matlab simulation results based on practical radio propagation data sets showed a localization error of 0.32 m with standard deviation of 0.26 m.This work was fully supported by the Vice Chancellor Doctoral Scholarship at Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand.Ahmad, T.; Li, XJ.; Seet, B.; Cano, J. (2020). Social Network Analysis Based Localization Technique with Clustered Closeness Centrality for 3D Wireless Sensor Networks. Electronics. 9(5):1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9050738S11995Zhou, B., Yao, X., Yang, L., Yang, S., Wu, S., Kim, Y., & Ai, L. (2019). Accurate Rigid Body Localization Using DoA Measurements from a Single Base Station. Electronics, 8(6), 622. doi:10.3390/electronics8060622Ahmad, T., Li, X., & Seet, B.-C. (2017). Parametric Loop Division for 3D Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors, 17(7), 1697. doi:10.3390/s17071697Kaur, A., Kumar, P., & Gupta, G. P. (2019). A weighted centroid localization algorithm for randomly deployed wireless sensor networks. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 31(1), 82-91. doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2017.01.007Khelifi, F., Bradai, A., Benslimane, A., Rawat, P., & Atri, M. (2018). A Survey of Localization Systems in Internet of Things. Mobile Networks and Applications, 24(3), 761-785. doi:10.1007/s11036-018-1090-3Sanchez-Iborra, R., G. Liaño, I., Simoes, C., Couñago, E., & Skarmeta, A. (2018). Tracking and Monitoring System Based on LoRa Technology for Lightweight Boats. Electronics, 8(1), 15. doi:10.3390/electronics8010015Sayed, A. H., Tarighat, A., & Khajehnouri, N. (2005). Network-based wireless location: challenges faced in developing techniques for accurate wireless location information. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 22(4), 24-40. doi:10.1109/msp.2005.1458275Maşazade, E., Ruixin Niu, Varshney, P. K., & Keskinoz, M. (2010). Energy Aware Iterative Source Localization for Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 58(9), 4824-4835. doi:10.1109/tsp.2010.2051433Yang, X., Kong, Q., & Xie, X. (2009). One-Dimensional Localization Algorithm Based on Signal Strength Ratio. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 5(1), 79-79. doi:10.1080/15501320802571822Xie, S., Wang, T., Hao, X., Yang, M., Zhu, Y., & Li, Y. (2019). Localization and Frequency Identification of Large-Range Wide-Band Electromagnetic Interference Sources in Electromagnetic Imaging System. Electronics, 8(5), 499. doi:10.3390/electronics8050499Zhu, X., Wu, X., & Chen, G. (2013). Relative localization for wireless sensor networks with linear topology. Computer Communications, 36(15-16), 1581-1591. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2013.07.007Meng, W., Xiao, W., & Xie, L. (2011). An Efficient EM Algorithm for Energy-Based Multisource Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 60(3), 1017-1027. doi:10.1109/tim.2010.2047035Lim, H., & Hou, J. C. (2009). Distributed localization for anisotropic sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 5(2), 1-26. doi:10.1145/1498915.1498917Xiaohong Sheng, & Yu-Hen Hu. (2005). Maximum likelihood multiple-source localization using acoustic energy measurements with wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 53(1), 44-53. doi:10.1109/tsp.2004.838930Yun Wang, Xiaodong Wang, Demin Wang, & Agrawal, D. P. (2009). Range-Free Localization Using Expected Hop Progress in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 20(10), 1540-1552. doi:10.1109/tpds.2008.239Huang, H., & Zheng, Y. R. (2018). Node localization with AoA assistance in multi-hop underwater sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 78, 32-41. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.05.005Zàruba, G. V., Huber, M., Kamangar, F. A., & Chlamtac, I. (2006). Indoor location tracking using RSSI readings from a single Wi-Fi access point. Wireless Networks, 13(2), 221-235. doi:10.1007/s11276-006-5064-1Singh, M., & Khilar, P. M. (2015). An analytical geometric range free localization scheme based on mobile beacon points in wireless sensor network. Wireless Networks, 22(8), 2537-2550. doi:10.1007/s11276-015-1116-8Yiqiang Chen, Qiang Yang, Jie Yin, & Xiaoyong Chai. (2006). Power-efficient access-point selection for indoor location estimation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 18(7), 877-888. doi:10.1109/tkde.2006.112Alzoubi, K., Li, X.-Y., Wang, Y., Wan, P.-J., & Frieder, O. (2003). Geometric spanners for wireless ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 14(4), 408-421. doi:10.1109/tpds.2003.1195412Safa, H. (2014). A novel localization algorithm for large scale wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 45, 32-46. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2014.03.020Kaemarungsi, K., & Krishnamurthy, P. (2012). Analysis of WLAN’s received signal strength indication for indoor location fingerprinting. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 8(2), 292-316. doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2011.09.003Patwari, N., Hero, A. O., Perkins, M., Correal, N. S., & O’Dea, R. J. (2003). Relative location estimation in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 51(8), 2137-2148. doi:10.1109/tsp.2003.814469Niculescu, D. (2003). Telecommunication Systems, 22(1/4), 267-280. doi:10.1023/a:1023403323460Mahyar, H., Hasheminezhad, R., Ghalebi K., E., Nazemian, A., Grosu, R., Movaghar, A., & Rabiee, H. R. (2018). Compressive sensing of high betweenness centrality nodes in networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 497, 166-184. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2017.12.145Plets, D., Bastiaens, S., Martens, L., & Joseph, W. (2019). An Analysis of the Impact of LED Tilt on Visible Light Positioning Accuracy. Electronics, 8(4), 389. doi:10.3390/electronics8040389RSSI Datasethttps://github.com/pspachos/RSSI-DatasetAhmad, T., Li, X. J., & Seet, B.-C. (2019). Noise Reduction Scheme for Parametric Loop Division 3D Wireless Localization Algorithm Based on Extended Kalman Filtering. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 8(2), 24. doi:10.3390/jsan8020024Benson, S. J., Ye, Y., & Zhang, X. (2000). Solving Large-Scale Sparse Semidefinite Programs for Combinatorial Optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 10(2), 443-461. doi:10.1137/s105262349732800