10,942 research outputs found

    ENERGY-EFFICIENT PROTOCOL DESIGN AND ANALYSIS FOR WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS

    Get PDF
    Wireless sensor networks are an emerging technology which has the promise of revolutionizing the way of collecting, processing and disseminating information. Due to the small sizes of sensor nodes, resources like battery capacity, memory and processing power are very limited. Wireless sensor networks are usually unattended oncedeployed and it is infeasible to replace batteries. Designing energy-efficient protocols to prolong the network life without compromising too much on the network performance is one of the major challenges being faced by researchers.Data generation in wireless sensor networks could be bursty as it is dictated by the presence or absence of events of interest that generate these data. Therefore sensor nodes stay idle for most of the time. However, idle listening consumes as much energy as receiving. To save the unnecessary energy consumption due to idlelistening, sensor nodes are usually put into sleep.MAC protocols coordinate data communications among neighboring nodes. We designed an energy-efficient MAC protocol called PMAC in which sleep-awake schedules are determined through pattern exchange. PMAC also adapts to different traffic conditions.To handle bursty traffic and meanwhile preserve energy, dual radio interfaces with different ranges, capacity and power consumption can be employed on each individual sensor node. We designed a distributed routing-layer switch agent which intelligently directs traffic between the dual radios. The low-power radio will be used for light traffic load to preserve energy. The high-power radio is turned on only when the traffic load becomes heavy or the end-to-end delay exceeds a certain threshold. Each radio has its own routing agent so that a better path can be found when the high-power radio is in use.Data gathering is a typical operation in wireless sensor networks where data flow through a data gathering tree towards a sink node. DMAC is a popular energyefficient MAC protocol specifically designed for data gathering in wireless sensor networks. It employs staggered sleep-awake schedules to enable continuous data forwarding along a data gathering tree, resulting in reduced end-to-end delays and energy consumption. we have analyzed end-to-end delay and energy consumption with respect to the source node for both constant bit rate traffic and stochastic traffic following a Poisson process. The stochastic traffic scenario is modeled as a discrete time Markov chain and expressions for state transition probabilities, the average delay and average energy consumption are developed and are evaluated numerically. Simulations are carried out with various parameters and the results are in line with the analytical results.Lots of work had been done on constructing energy-efficient data gathering trees at the routing layer. We proposed a sleep scheme at the routing layer called DGSS which could be incorporated into different data gathering tree formation algorithms. Unlike DMAC, in which nodes are scanned level by level, DGSS starts scanningfrom the leaf nodes and shrinks inward towards the sink node. Simulation shows that DGSS can achieve better energy efficiency than DMAC at relatively higher data rates

    RTXP : A Localized Real-Time Mac-Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks

    Get PDF
    Protocols developed during the last years for Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) are mainly focused on energy efficiency and autonomous mechanisms (e.g. self-organization, self-configuration, etc). Nevertheless, with new WSN applications, appear new QoS requirements such as time constraints. Real-time applications require the packets to be delivered before a known time bound which depends on the application requirements. We particularly focus on applications which consist in alarms sent to the sink node. We propose Real-Time X-layer Protocol (RTXP), a real-time communication protocol. To the best of our knowledge, RTXP is the first MAC and routing real-time communication protocol that is not centralized, but instead relies only on local information. The solution is cross-layer (X-layer) because it allows to control the delays due to MAC and Routing layers interactions. RTXP uses a suited hop-count-based Virtual Coordinate System which allows deterministic medium access and forwarder selection. In this paper we describe the protocol mechanisms. We give theoretical bound on the end-to-end delay and the capacity of the protocol. Intensive simulation results confirm the theoretical predictions and allow to compare with a real-time centralized solution. RTXP is also simulated under harsh radio channel, in this case the radio link introduces probabilistic behavior. Nevertheless, we show that RTXP it performs better than a non-deterministic solution. It thus advocates for the usefulness of designing real-time (deterministic) protocols even for highly unreliable networks such as WSNs

    Distributed Optimal Rate-Reliability-Lifetime Tradeoff in Wireless Sensor Networks

    Full text link
    The transmission rate, delivery reliability and network lifetime are three fundamental but conflicting design objectives in energy-constrained wireless sensor networks. In this paper, we address the optimal rate-reliability-lifetime tradeoff with link capacity constraint, reliability constraint and energy constraint. By introducing the weight parameters, we combine the objectives at rate, reliability, and lifetime into a single objective to characterize the tradeoff among them. However, the optimization formulation of the rate-reliability-reliability tradeoff is neither separable nor convex. Through a series of transformations, a separable and convex problem is derived, and an efficient distributed Subgradient Dual Decomposition algorithm (SDD) is proposed. Numerical examples confirm its convergence. Also, numerical examples investigate the impact of weight parameters on the rate utility, reliability utility and network lifetime, which provide a guidance to properly set the value of weight parameters for a desired performance of WSNs according to the realistic application's requirements.Comment: 27 pages, 10 figure

    Survey of Inter-satellite Communication for Small Satellite Systems: Physical Layer to Network Layer View

    Get PDF
    Small satellite systems enable whole new class of missions for navigation, communications, remote sensing and scientific research for both civilian and military purposes. As individual spacecraft are limited by the size, mass and power constraints, mass-produced small satellites in large constellations or clusters could be useful in many science missions such as gravity mapping, tracking of forest fires, finding water resources, etc. Constellation of satellites provide improved spatial and temporal resolution of the target. Small satellite constellations contribute innovative applications by replacing a single asset with several very capable spacecraft which opens the door to new applications. With increasing levels of autonomy, there will be a need for remote communication networks to enable communication between spacecraft. These space based networks will need to configure and maintain dynamic routes, manage intermediate nodes, and reconfigure themselves to achieve mission objectives. Hence, inter-satellite communication is a key aspect when satellites fly in formation. In this paper, we present the various researches being conducted in the small satellite community for implementing inter-satellite communications based on the Open System Interconnection (OSI) model. This paper also reviews the various design parameters applicable to the first three layers of the OSI model, i.e., physical, data link and network layer. Based on the survey, we also present a comprehensive list of design parameters useful for achieving inter-satellite communications for multiple small satellite missions. Specific topics include proposed solutions for some of the challenges faced by small satellite systems, enabling operations using a network of small satellites, and some examples of small satellite missions involving formation flying aspects.Comment: 51 pages, 21 Figures, 11 Tables, accepted in IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorial

    Energy managed reporting for wireless sensor networks

    No full text
    In this paper, we propose a technique to extend the network lifetime of a wireless sensor network, whereby each sensor node decides its individual network involvement based on its own energy resources and the information contained in each packet. The information content is ascertained through a system of rules describing prospective events in the sensed environment, and how important such events are. While the packets deemed most important are propagated by all sensor nodes, low importance packets are handled by only the nodes with high energy reserves. Results obtained from simulations depicting a wireless sensor network used to monitor pump temperature in an industrial environment have shown that a considerable increase in the network lifetime and network connectivity can be obtained. The results also show that when coupled with a form of energy harvesting, our technique can enable perpetual network operatio

    Information Centric Networking in the IoT: Experiments with NDN in the Wild

    Get PDF
    This paper explores the feasibility, advantages, and challenges of an ICN-based approach in the Internet of Things. We report on the first NDN experiments in a life-size IoT deployment, spread over tens of rooms on several floors of a building. Based on the insights gained with these experiments, the paper analyses the shortcomings of CCN applied to IoT. Several interoperable CCN enhancements are then proposed and evaluated. We significantly decreased control traffic (i.e., interest messages) and leverage data path and caching to match IoT requirements in terms of energy and bandwidth constraints. Our optimizations increase content availability in case of IoT nodes with intermittent activity. This paper also provides the first experimental comparison of CCN with the common IoT standards 6LoWPAN/RPL/UDP.Comment: 10 pages, 10 figures and tables, ACM ICN-2014 conferenc
    corecore