A dynamic performance evaluation of distress prediction models

YesSo far, the dominant comparative studies of competing distress prediction models (DPMs) have been restricted to the use of static evaluation frameworks and as such overlooked their performance over time. This study fills this gap by proposing a Malmquist Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)-based multi-period performance evaluation framework for assessing competing static and dynamic statistical DPMs and using it to address a variety of research questions. Our findings suggest that (1) dynamic models developed under duration-dependent frameworks outperform both dynamic models developed under duration-independent frameworks and static models; (2) models fed with financial accounting (FA), market variables (MV), and macroeconomic information (MI) features outperform those fed with either MVMI or FA, regardless of the frameworks under which they are developed; (3) shorter training horizons seem to enhance the aggregate performance of both static and dynamic models

Hybrid model using logit and nonparametric methods for predicting micro-entity failure

Following the calls from literature on bankruptcy, a parsimonious hybrid bankruptcy model is developed in this paper by combining parametric and non-parametric approaches.To this end, the variables with the highest predictive power to detect bankruptcy are selected using logistic regression (LR). Subsequently, alternative non-parametric methods (Multilayer Perceptron, Rough Set, and Classification-Regression Trees) are applied, in turn, to firms classified as either “bankrupt” or “not bankrupt”. Our findings show that hybrid models, particularly those combining LR and Multilayer Perceptron, offer better accuracy performance and interpretability and converge faster than each method implemented in isolation. Moreover, the authors demonstrate that the introduction of non-financial and macroeconomic variables complement financial ratios for bankruptcy prediction

SME default prediction: A systematic methodology-focused review

This study reviews the methodologies used in the literature to predict failure in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). We identified 145 SMEs’ default prediction studies from 1972 to early 2023. We summarized the methods used in each study. The focus points are estimation methods, sample re-balancing methods, variable selection techniques, validation methods, and variables included in the literature. More than 1,200 factors used in failure prediction models have been identified, along with 54 unique feature selection techniques and 80 unique estimation methods. Over one-third of the studies do not use any feature selection method, and more than one-quarter use only in-sample validation. Our main recommendation for researchers is to use feature selection and validate results using hold-out samples or cross-validation. As an avenue for further research, we suggest in-depth empirical comparisons of estimation methods, feature selection techniques, and sample re-balancing methods based on some large and commonly used datasets.publishedVersio

Ennustemallin kehittäminen suomalaisten PK-yritysten konkurssiriskin määritykseen

Bankruptcy prediction is a subject of significant interest to both academics and practitioners because of its vast economic and societal impact. Academic research in the field is extensive and diverse; no consensus has formed regarding the superiority of different prediction methods or predictor variables. Most studies focus on large companies; small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have received less attention, mainly due to data unavailability. Despite recent academic advances, simple statistical models are still favored in practical use, largely due to their understandability and interpretability. This study aims to construct a high-performing but user-friendly and interpretable bankruptcy prediction model for Finnish SMEs using financial statement data from 2008–2010. A literature review is conducted to explore the key aspects of bankruptcy prediction; the findings are used for designing an empirical study. Five prediction models are trained on different predictor subsets and training samples, and two models are chosen for detailed examination based on the findings. A prediction model using the random forest method, utilizing all available predictors and the unadjusted training data containing an imbalance of bankrupt and non-bankrupt firms, is found to perform best. Superior performance compared to a benchmark model is observed in terms of both key metrics, and the random forest model is deemed easy to use and interpretable; it is therefore recommended for practical application. Equity ratio and financial expenses to total assets consistently rank as the best two predictors for different models; otherwise the findings on predictor importance are mixed, but mainly in line with the prevalent views in the related literature. This study shows that constructing an accurate but practical bankruptcy prediction model is feasible, and serves as a guideline for future scholars and practitioners seeking to achieve the same. Some further research avenues to follow are recognized based on empirical findings and the extant literature. In particular, this study raises an important question regarding the appropriateness of the most commonly used performance metrics in bankruptcy prediction. Area under the precision-recall curve (PR AUC), which is widely used in other fields of study, is deemed a suitable alternative and is recommended for measuring model performance in future bankruptcy prediction studies.Konkurssien ennustaminen on taloudellisten ja yhteiskunnallisten vaikutustensa vuoksi merkittävä aihe akateemisesta ja käytännöllisestä näkökulmasta. Alan tutkimus on laajaa ja monipuolista, eikä konsensusta parhaiden ennustemallien ja -muuttujien suhteen ole saavutettu. Valtaosa tutkimuksista keskittyy suuryrityksiin; pienten ja keskisuurten (PK)-yritysten konkurssimallinnus on jäänyt vähemmälle huomiolle. Akateemisen tutkimuksen viimeaikaisesta kehityksestä huolimatta käytännön sovellukset perustuvat usein yksinkertaisille tilastollisille malleille johtuen niiden paremmasta ymmärrettävyydestä. Tässä diplomityössä rakennetaan ennustemalli suomalaisten PK-yritysten konkurssiriskin määritykseen käyttäen tilinpäätösdataa vuosilta 2008–2010. Tavoitteena on tarkka, mutta käyttäjäystävällinen ja helposti tulkittava malli. Konkurssimallinnuksen keskeisiin osa-alueisiin perehdytään kirjallisuuskatsauksessa, jonka pohjalta suunnitellaan empiirinen tutkimus. Viiden mallinnusmenetelmän suoriutumista vertaillaan erilaisia opetusaineiston ja ennustemuuttujien osajoukkoja käyttäen, ja löydösten perusteella kaksi parasta menetelmää otetaan lähempään tarkasteluun. Satunnaismetsä (random forest) -koneoppimismenetelmää käyttävä, kaikkia saatavilla olevia ennustemuuttujia ja muokkaamatonta, epäsuhtaisesti konkurssi- ja ei-konkurssitapauksia sisältävää opetusaineistoa hyödyntävä malli toimii parhaiten. Keskeisten suorituskykymittarien valossa satunnaismetsämalli suoriutuu käytettyä verrokkia paremmin, ja todetaan helppokäyttöiseksi ja hyvin tulkittavaksi; sitä suositellaan sovellettavaksi käytäntöön. Omavaraisuusaste ja rahoituskulujen suhde taseen loppusummaan osoittautuvat johdonmukaisesti parhaiksi ennustemuuttujiksi eri mallinnusmetodeilla, mutta muilta osin havainnot muuttujien keskinäisestä paremmuudesta ovat vaihtelevia. Tämä diplomityö osoittaa, että konkurssiennustemalli voi olla sekä tarkka että käytännöllinen, ja tarjoaa suuntaviivoja tuleville tutkimuksille. Empiiristen havaintojen ja kirjallisuuslöydösten pohjalta esitetään jatkotutkimusehdotuksia. Erityisen tärkeä huomio on se, että konkurssiennustamisessa tyypillisesti käytettyjen suorituskykymittarien soveltuvuus on kyseenalaista konkurssitapausten harvinaisuudesta johtuen. Muilla tutkimusaloilla laajasti käytetty tarkkuus-saantikäyrän alle jäävä pinta-ala (PR AUC) todetaan soveliaaksi vaihtoehdoksi, ja sitä suositellaan käytettäväksi konkurssimallien suorituskyvyn mittaukseen. Avainsanat konkurssien ennustaminen, luottoriski, koneoppiminen

Modern biomass-based transportation fuels from pyrolysis process, bio-ethanol, bio-methanol and bio-diesel

In this paper, the modern biomass-based transportation fuels such as fuels from Pyrolysis process, bio-ethanol, bio-methanol, and bio-diesel are briefly reviewed. Here, the term bio-fuel and non-organic fuel is referred to as liquid or gaseous fuels for the transport sector that are predominantly produced from biomass. There are several reasons for bio-fuels and non-organic fuel to be considered as relevant technologies by both developing and industrialized countries. They include energy security reasons, environmental concerns, foreign exchange savings, and socioeconomic issues related to the rural sector. The term modern biomass is generally used to describe the traditional biomass use through the efficient and clean combustion technologies and sustained supply of biomass resources, environmentally sound and competitive fuels, heat and electricity using modern conversion technologies. Modern bio-mass can be used for the generation of electricity and heat. Bio-ethanol, bio-methanol and bio-diesel as well as diesel produced from biomass by Pyrolysis process are the most modern biomass-based transportation fuels. Bio-ethanol is a petrol additive/substitute

Financial and economic determinants of firm default

This paper investigates the relevance of financial and economic variables as determinants of firm defaults. Our analysis is not limited to publicly traded companies but extends to a large sample of limited liability firms. We consider size, growth, profitability and productivity together with a standard set of financial indicators. Non parametric tests allow to asses to what extent defaulting firms differ from the non-defaulting group. Bootstrap probit regressions confirm that economic variables play both a long and short term effect. Our findings are robust with respect to the inclusion of Distance to Deafult and risk ratings among the regressors.firm default, financial indicators, selection and growth dynamics, kernel densities, stochastic equality, bootstrap probit regressions, distance to default