69,531 research outputs found
Learning preferences for large scale multi-label problems
Despite that the majority of machine learning approaches aim to solve binary classification problems, several real-world applications require specialized algorithms able to handle many different classes, as in the case of single-label multi-class and multi-label classification problems. The Label Ranking framework is a generalization of the above mentioned settings, which aims to map instances from the input space to a total order over the set of possible labels. However, generally these algorithms are more complex than binary ones, and their application on large-scale datasets could be untractable. The main contribution of this work is the proposal of a novel general online preference-based label ranking framework. The proposed framework is able to solve binary, multi-class, multi-label and ranking problems. A comparison with other baselines has been performed, showing effectiveness and efficiency in a real-world large-scale multi-label task
On the Bayes-optimality of F-measure maximizers
The F-measure, which has originally been introduced in information retrieval,
is nowadays routinely used as a performance metric for problems such as binary
classification, multi-label classification, and structured output prediction.
Optimizing this measure is a statistically and computationally challenging
problem, since no closed-form solution exists. Adopting a decision-theoretic
perspective, this article provides a formal and experimental analysis of
different approaches for maximizing the F-measure. We start with a Bayes-risk
analysis of related loss functions, such as Hamming loss and subset zero-one
loss, showing that optimizing such losses as a surrogate of the F-measure leads
to a high worst-case regret. Subsequently, we perform a similar type of
analysis for F-measure maximizing algorithms, showing that such algorithms are
approximate, while relying on additional assumptions regarding the statistical
distribution of the binary response variables. Furthermore, we present a new
algorithm which is not only computationally efficient but also Bayes-optimal,
regardless of the underlying distribution. To this end, the algorithm requires
only a quadratic (with respect to the number of binary responses) number of
parameters of the joint distribution. We illustrate the practical performance
of all analyzed methods by means of experiments with multi-label classification
problems
Large-scale Multi-label Learning with Missing Labels
The multi-label classification problem has generated significant interest in
recent years. However, existing approaches do not adequately address two key
challenges: (a) the ability to tackle problems with a large number (say
millions) of labels, and (b) the ability to handle data with missing labels. In
this paper, we directly address both these problems by studying the multi-label
problem in a generic empirical risk minimization (ERM) framework. Our
framework, despite being simple, is surprisingly able to encompass several
recent label-compression based methods which can be derived as special cases of
our method. To optimize the ERM problem, we develop techniques that exploit the
structure of specific loss functions - such as the squared loss function - to
offer efficient algorithms. We further show that our learning framework admits
formal excess risk bounds even in the presence of missing labels. Our risk
bounds are tight and demonstrate better generalization performance for low-rank
promoting trace-norm regularization when compared to (rank insensitive)
Frobenius norm regularization. Finally, we present extensive empirical results
on a variety of benchmark datasets and show that our methods perform
significantly better than existing label compression based methods and can
scale up to very large datasets such as the Wikipedia dataset
An Empirical Study and Analysis of Generalized Zero-Shot Learning for Object Recognition in the Wild
Zero-shot learning (ZSL) methods have been studied in the unrealistic setting
where test data are assumed to come from unseen classes only. In this paper, we
advocate studying the problem of generalized zero-shot learning (GZSL) where
the test data's class memberships are unconstrained. We show empirically that
naively using the classifiers constructed by ZSL approaches does not perform
well in the generalized setting. Motivated by this, we propose a simple but
effective calibration method that can be used to balance two conflicting
forces: recognizing data from seen classes versus those from unseen ones. We
develop a performance metric to characterize such a trade-off and examine the
utility of this metric in evaluating various ZSL approaches. Our analysis
further shows that there is a large gap between the performance of existing
approaches and an upper bound established via idealized semantic embeddings,
suggesting that improving class semantic embeddings is vital to GZSL.Comment: ECCV2016 camera-read
- …