Embeddability in the 3-sphere is decidable

We show that the following algorithmic problem is decidable: given a $2$-dimensional simplicial complex, can it be embedded (topologically, or equivalently, piecewise linearly) in $\mathbf{R}^3$? By a known reduction, it suffices to decide the embeddability of a given triangulated 3-manifold $X$ into the 3-sphere $S^3$. The main step, which allows us to simplify $X$ and recurse, is in proving that if $X$ can be embedded in $S^3$, then there is also an embedding in which $X$ has a short meridian, i.e., an essential curve in the boundary of $X$ bounding a disk in $S^3\setminus X$ with length bounded by a computable function of the number of tetrahedra of $X$.Comment: 54 pages, 26 figures; few faulty references to figures in the first version fixe

Algorithmic aspects of immersibility and embeddability

We analyze an algorithmic question about immersion theory: for which $m$, $n$, and $CAT=\mathbf{Diff}$ or $\mathbf{PL}$ is the question of whether an $m$-dimensional $CAT$-manifold is immersible in $\mathbb{R}^n$ decidable? As a corollary, we show that the smooth embeddability of an $m$-manifold with boundary in $\mathbb{R}^n$ is undecidable when $n-m$ is even and $11m \geq 10n+1$.Comment: 20 pages, 1 figure. Revised in response to comments by several referees, no major changes in mathematical conten

Geometric Embeddability of Complexes Is ??-Complete

We show that the decision problem of determining whether a given (abstract simplicial) k-complex has a geometric embedding in ?^d is complete for the Existential Theory of the Reals for all d ? 3 and k ? {d-1,d}. Consequently, the problem is polynomial time equivalent to determining whether a polynomial equation system has a real solution and other important problems from various fields related to packing, Nash equilibria, minimum convex covers, the Art Gallery Problem, continuous constraint satisfaction problems, and training neural networks. Moreover, this implies NP-hardness and constitutes the first hardness result for the algorithmic problem of geometric embedding (abstract simplicial) complexes. This complements recent breakthroughs for the computational complexity of piece-wise linear embeddability

Combinatorics of embeddings

We offer the following explanation of the statement of the Kuratowski graph planarity criterion and of 6/7 of the statement of the Robertson-Seymour-Thomas intrinsic linking criterion. Let us call a cell complex 'dichotomial' if to every cell there corresponds a unique cell with the complementary set of vertices. Then every dichotomial cell complex is PL homeomorphic to a sphere; there exist precisely two 3-dimensional dichotomial cell complexes, and their 1-skeleta are K_5 and K_{3,3}; and precisely six 4-dimensional ones, and their 1-skeleta all but one graphs of the Petersen family. In higher dimensions n>2, we observe that in order to characterize those compact n-polyhedra that embed in S^{2n} in terms of finitely many "prohibited minors", it suffices to establish finiteness of the list of all (n-1)-connected n-dimensional finite cell complexes that do not embed in S^{2n} yet all their proper subcomplexes and proper cell-like combinatorial quotients embed there. Our main result is that this list contains the n-skeleta of (2n+1)-dimensional dichotomial cell complexes. The 2-skeleta of 5-dimensional dichotomial cell complexes include (apart from the three joins of the i-skeleta of (2i+2)-simplices) at least ten non-simplicial complexes.Comment: 49 pages, 1 figure. Minor improvements in v2 (subsection 4.C on transforms of dichotomial spheres reworked to include more details; subsection 2.D "Algorithmic issues" added, etc