85,093 research outputs found
On-the-fly adaptivity for nonlinear twoscale simulations using artificial neural networks and reduced order modeling
A multi-fidelity surrogate model for highly nonlinear multiscale problems is
proposed. It is based on the introduction of two different surrogate models and
an adaptive on-the-fly switching. The two concurrent surrogates are built
incrementally starting from a moderate set of evaluations of the full order
model. Therefore, a reduced order model (ROM) is generated. Using a hybrid
ROM-preconditioned FE solver, additional effective stress-strain data is
simulated while the number of samples is kept to a moderate level by using a
dedicated and physics-guided sampling technique. Machine learning (ML) is
subsequently used to build the second surrogate by means of artificial neural
networks (ANN). Different ANN architectures are explored and the features used
as inputs of the ANN are fine tuned in order to improve the overall quality of
the ML model. Additional ANN surrogates for the stress errors are generated.
Therefore, conservative design guidelines for error surrogates are presented by
adapting the loss functions of the ANN training in pure regression or pure
classification settings. The error surrogates can be used as quality indicators
in order to adaptively select the appropriate -- i.e. efficient yet accurate --
surrogate. Two strategies for the on-the-fly switching are investigated and a
practicable and robust algorithm is proposed that eliminates relevant technical
difficulties attributed to model switching. The provided algorithms and ANN
design guidelines can easily be adopted for different problem settings and,
thereby, they enable generalization of the used machine learning techniques for
a wide range of applications. The resulting hybrid surrogate is employed in
challenging multilevel FE simulations for a three-phase composite with
pseudo-plastic micro-constituents. Numerical examples highlight the performance
of the proposed approach
Remedy for Now but Prohibit for Tomorrow: The Deterrence Effects of Merger Policy Tools
Antitrust policy involves not just the regulation of anti-competitive behavior, but also an important deterrence effect. Neither scholars nor policymakers have fully researched the deterrence effects of merger policy tools, as they have been unable to empirically measure these effects. We consider the ability of different antitrust actions â Prohibitions, Remedies, and Monitorings â to deter firms from engaging in mergers. We employ cross-jurisdiction/pan-time data on merger policy to empirically estimate the impact of antitrust actions on future merger frequencies. We find merger prohibitions to lead to decreased merger notifications in subsequent periods, and remedies to weakly increase future merger notifications: in other words, prohibitions involve a deterrence effect but remedies do not
- âŠ