Electrical stimulation of visual cortex can immediately improve spatial vision

Published in final edited form as:Curr Biol. 2016 July 25; 26(14): 1867–1872. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.05.019.SUMMARY We can improve human vision by correcting the optics of our lenses [1, 2, 3]. However, after the eye transduces the light, visual cortex has its own limitations that are challenging to correct [4]. Overcoming these limitations has typically involved innovative training regimes that improve vision across many days [5, 6]. In the present study, we wanted to determine whether it is possible to immediately improve the precision of spatial vision with noninvasive direct-current stimulation. Previous work suggested that visual processing could be modulated with such stimulation [7, 8, 9]. However, the short duration and variability of such effects made it seem unlikely that spatial vision could be improved for more than several minutes [7, 10]. Here we show that visual acuity in the parafoveal belt can be immediately improved by delivering noninvasive direct current to visual cortex. Twenty minutes of anodal stimulation improved subjects’ vernier acuity by approximately 15% and increased the amplitude of the earliest visually evoked potentials in lockstep with the behavioral effects. When we reversed the orientation of the electric field, we impaired resolution and reduced the amplitude of visually evoked potentials. Next, we found that anodal stimulation improved acuity enough to be measurable with the relatively coarse Snellen test and that subjects with the poorest acuity benefited the most from stimulation. Finally, we found that stimulation-induced acuity improvements were accompanied by changes in contrast sensitivity at high spatial frequencies.This work was supported by grants from the NIH (R01-EY019882, R01-EY025275, P30-EY08126, T32-EY007135, F31-MH102042). We thank the reviewers and Randolph Blake for helpful comments. We thank Kevin Dieter for technical assistance in designing the psychophysical procedure for experiment 5. Subjects gave informed written consent to procedures approved by the Vanderbilt University Institutional Review Board and were compensated at a rate of $10/hr for their time. (R01-EY019882 - NIH; R01-EY025275 - NIH; P30-EY08126 - NIH; T32-EY007135 - NIH; F31-MH102042 - NIH)Accepted manuscrip

The measurement of auditory interhemispheric transfer time (IHTT) in children with normal auditory processing abilities

Interhemispheric transfer time (IHTT) is the time it takes for information to be transmitted from one hemisphere to the other. The goal of this study was to determine if differences existed in the IHTT of children 6 to 9 years of age with normal auditory processing abilities by the use of an objective measure (auditory late evoked potentials [ALEPs]), specifically waves P1, N1 and P2. It was hypothesized that there would be no difference in IHTT between the groups due to the age range of participants being tested. The 16 participants were divided into two groups based on age and a 2000 Hz tone burst was presented to the test ear for the quiet condition while competing speech babble was presented to the non-test ear for the noise condition. When observing latency in the noise condition, the left ear shifted to a greater extent than the right ear in both groups; however, the younger group revealed longer latency for P1, N1 and P2. Although IHTT was longer in noise than in quiet, both groups reacted similarly due to the similarity in age of participants tested

Motor observation, motor performance, and motor imagery : an ERP study.

Two major theoretical models, Direct Mapping and Functional Equivalence, suggest that the observation of action and imagery of action, respectively, involve activation of similar motor related areas. Despite the wealth of evidence that supports these two perspectives, the degree to which these motor-related actions overlap is still only vaguely defined. The present investigation sought to assess both the spatial and temporal characteristics of the brain activity involved in these motor related conditions. Specifically, the present study used ERP technology to assess the neural substrates of Motor Observation, Motor Performance, and Motor Imagery. Participants viewed images depicting two human grasping motions, whole hand grasping or precision finger-to-thumb grasping. Participants were to report, perform, or imagine performing the observed action depicted in the target image. Ongoing EEG was time-locked to the presentation of the target image. The EEG data were filtered, segmented, submitted to a series of artifact correction procedures, then averaged. Subsequently, the averaged data were subject a two-step sequential principal component analysis. These were then subjected to repeated measures ANOVAs. Additional analyses included amplitude and latency measures, obtained from selected regions across different conditions. These measures were compared and examined for group differences. In addition, Low Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography was used to elucidate the underlying neural activity. Specifically, all three of the motor related experimental conditions were expected to show increased activation of motor related areas on the contralateral hemisphere (left hemisphere) to the instructed action, particularly in the Primary Motor Cortex and Primary Somatosensory Cortex, and increased activation in the Supplementary Motor Area, relative to a nonmotor control condition. However, the statistical analyses failed to support these hypotheses. In the end, a greater understanding of these processes through scientific advances further develops and improves both interventions and treatments aimed at bettering the lives of those suffering from a myriad of psychological, physical and psychophysical disorders resulting from many psychobiological causes including stroke, dismemberment, physical injury, and cognitive dysfunction. While the present study failed to further elucidate these neural mechanisms, this area of study is increasingly important and beneficial to wide ranging areas of medicine, neuroscience, and cognitive and sports psychology

Eye and hand movements during reconstruction of spatial memory

© 2012 a Pion publicationRecent behavioural and biological evidence indicates common mechanisms serving working memory and attention (e.g., Awh et al, 2006 Neuroscience 139 201-208). This study explored the role of spatial attention and visual search in an adapted Corsi spatial memory task. Eye movements and touch responses were recorded from participants who recalled locations (signalled by colour or shape change) from an array presented either simultaneously or sequentially. The time delay between target presentation and recall (0, 5, or 10 s) and the number of locations to be remembered (2-5) were also manipulated. Analysis of the response phase revealed subjects were less accurate (touch data) and fixated longer (eye data) when responding to sequentially presented targets suggesting higher cognitive effort. Fixation duration on target at recall was also influenced by whether spatial location was initially signalled by colour or shape change. Finally, we found that the sequence tasks encouraged longer fixations on the signalled targets than simultaneous viewing during encoding, but no difference was observed during recall. We conclude that the attentional manipulations (colour/shape) mainly affected the eye movement parameters, whereas the memory manipulation (sequential versus simultaneous, number of items) mainly affected the performance of the hand during recall, and thus the latter is more important for ascertaining if an item is remembered or forgotten. In summary, the nature of the stimuli that is used and how it is presented play key roles in determining subject performance and behaviour during spatial memory tasks