4,582 research outputs found

    Approximating the least hypervolume contributor: NP-hard in general, but fast in practice

    Get PDF
    The hypervolume indicator is an increasingly popular set measure to compare the quality of two Pareto sets. The basic ingredient of most hypervolume indicator based optimization algorithms is the calculation of the hypervolume contribution of single solutions regarding a Pareto set. We show that exact calculation of the hypervolume contribution is #P-hard while its approximation is NP-hard. The same holds for the calculation of the minimal contribution. We also prove that it is NP-hard to decide whether a solution has the least hypervolume contribution. Even deciding whether the contribution of a solution is at most (1+\eps) times the minimal contribution is NP-hard. This implies that it is neither possible to efficiently find the least contributing solution (unless P=NPP = NP) nor to approximate it (unless NP=BPPNP = BPP). Nevertheless, in the second part of the paper we present a fast approximation algorithm for this problem. We prove that for arbitrarily given \eps,\delta>0 it calculates a solution with contribution at most (1+\eps) times the minimal contribution with probability at least (1δ)(1-\delta). Though it cannot run in polynomial time for all instances, it performs extremely fast on various benchmark datasets. The algorithm solves very large problem instances which are intractable for exact algorithms (e.g., 10000 solutions in 100 dimensions) within a few seconds.Comment: 22 pages, to appear in Theoretical Computer Scienc

    Polylogarithmic Approximation for Generalized Minimum Manhattan Networks

    Full text link
    Given a set of nn terminals, which are points in dd-dimensional Euclidean space, the minimum Manhattan network problem (MMN) asks for a minimum-length rectilinear network that connects each pair of terminals by a Manhattan path, that is, a path consisting of axis-parallel segments whose total length equals the pair's Manhattan distance. Even for d=2d=2, the problem is NP-hard, but constant-factor approximations are known. For d3d \ge 3, the problem is APX-hard; it is known to admit, for any \eps > 0, an O(n^\eps)-approximation. In the generalized minimum Manhattan network problem (GMMN), we are given a set RR of nn terminal pairs, and the goal is to find a minimum-length rectilinear network such that each pair in RR is connected by a Manhattan path. GMMN is a generalization of both MMN and the well-known rectilinear Steiner arborescence problem (RSA). So far, only special cases of GMMN have been considered. We present an O(logd+1n)O(\log^{d+1} n)-approximation algorithm for GMMN (and, hence, MMN) in d2d \ge 2 dimensions and an O(logn)O(\log n)-approximation algorithm for 2D. We show that an existing O(logn)O(\log n)-approximation algorithm for RSA in 2D generalizes easily to d>2d>2 dimensions.Comment: 14 pages, 5 figures; added appendix and figure

    Hyperorthogonal well-folded Hilbert curves

    Get PDF
    R-trees can be used to store and query sets of point data in two or more dimensions. An easy way to construct and maintain R-trees for two-dimensional points, due to Kamel and Faloutsos, is to keep the points in the order in which they appear along the Hilbert curve. The R-tree will then store bounding boxes of points along contiguous sections of the curve, and the efficiency of the R-tree depends on the size of the bounding boxes---smaller is better. Since there are many different ways to generalize the Hilbert curve to higher dimensions, this raises the question which generalization results in the smallest bounding boxes. Familiar methods, such as the one by Butz, can result in curve sections whose bounding boxes are a factor Ω(2d/2)\Omega(2^{d/2}) larger than the volume traversed by that section of the curve. Most of the volume bounded by such bounding boxes would not contain any data points. In this paper we present a new way of generalizing Hilbert's curve to higher dimensions, which results in much tighter bounding boxes: they have at most 4 times the volume of the part of the curve covered, independent of the number of dimensions. Moreover, we prove that a factor 4 is asymptotically optimal.Comment: Manuscript submitted to Journal of Computational Geometry. An abstract appeared in the 31st Int Symp on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2015), LIPIcs 34:812-82

    Approximating Smallest Containers for Packing Three-dimensional Convex Objects

    Get PDF
    We investigate the problem of computing a minimal-volume container for the non-overlapping packing of a given set of three-dimensional convex objects. Already the simplest versions of the problem are NP-hard so that we cannot expect to find exact polynomial time algorithms. We give constant ratio approximation algorithms for packing axis-parallel (rectangular) cuboids under translation into an axis-parallel (rectangular) cuboid as container, for cuboids under rigid motions into an axis-parallel cuboid or into an arbitrary convex container, and for packing convex polyhedra under rigid motions into an axis-parallel cuboid or arbitrary convex container. This work gives the first approximability results for the computation of minimal volume containers for the objects described
    corecore