2,266 research outputs found
Constraint-Based Qualitative Simulation
We consider qualitative simulation involving a finite set of qualitative
relations in presence of complete knowledge about their interrelationship. We
show how it can be naturally captured by means of constraints expressed in
temporal logic and constraint satisfaction problems. The constraints relate at
each stage the 'past' of a simulation with its 'future'. The benefit of this
approach is that it readily leads to an implementation based on constraint
technology that can be used to generate simulations and to answer queries about
them.Comment: 10 pages, to appear at the conference TIME 200
Flexible Execution of Plans with Choice
Dynamic plan execution strategies allow an autonomous
agent to respond to uncertainties while improving
robustness and reducing the need for an overly
conservative plan. Executives have improved this robustness
by expanding the types of choices made dynamically,
such as selecting alternate methods. However,
in methods to date, these additional choices introduce
substantial run-time latency. This paper presents a
novel system called Drake that makes steps towards executing
an expanded set of choices dynamically without
significant latency.
Drake frames a plan as a Disjunctive Temporal Problem
and executes it with a fast dynamic scheduling algorithm.
Prior work demonstrated an efficient technique
for dynamic execution of one special type of DTPs by
using an off-line compilation step to find the possible
consistent choices and compactly record the differences
between them. Drake extends this work to handle a
more general set of choices by recording the minimal
differences between the solutions which are required at
run-time. On randomly generated structured plans with
choice, we show a reduction in the size of the solution
set of over two orders of magnitude, compared to prior
art
A New Rational Algorithm for View Updating in Relational Databases
The dynamics of belief and knowledge is one of the major components of any
autonomous system that should be able to incorporate new pieces of information.
In order to apply the rationality result of belief dynamics theory to various
practical problems, it should be generalized in two respects: first it should
allow a certain part of belief to be declared as immutable; and second, the
belief state need not be deductively closed. Such a generalization of belief
dynamics, referred to as base dynamics, is presented in this paper, along with
the concept of a generalized revision algorithm for knowledge bases (Horn or
Horn logic with stratified negation). We show that knowledge base dynamics has
an interesting connection with kernel change via hitting set and abduction. In
this paper, we show how techniques from disjunctive logic programming can be
used for efficient (deductive) database updates. The key idea is to transform
the given database together with the update request into a disjunctive
(datalog) logic program and apply disjunctive techniques (such as minimal model
reasoning) to solve the original update problem. The approach extends and
integrates standard techniques for efficient query answering and integrity
checking. The generation of a hitting set is carried out through a hyper
tableaux calculus and magic set that is focused on the goal of minimality.Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1301.515
A Multi-Engine Approach to Answer Set Programming
Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a truly-declarative programming paradigm
proposed in the area of non-monotonic reasoning and logic programming, that has
been recently employed in many applications. The development of efficient ASP
systems is, thus, crucial. Having in mind the task of improving the solving
methods for ASP, there are two usual ways to reach this goal: extending
state-of-the-art techniques and ASP solvers, or designing a new ASP
solver from scratch. An alternative to these trends is to build on top of
state-of-the-art solvers, and to apply machine learning techniques for choosing
automatically the "best" available solver on a per-instance basis.
In this paper we pursue this latter direction. We first define a set of
cheap-to-compute syntactic features that characterize several aspects of ASP
programs. Then, we apply classification methods that, given the features of the
instances in a {\sl training} set and the solvers' performance on these
instances, inductively learn algorithm selection strategies to be applied to a
{\sl test} set. We report the results of a number of experiments considering
solvers and different training and test sets of instances taken from the ones
submitted to the "System Track" of the 3rd ASP Competition. Our analysis shows
that, by applying machine learning techniques to ASP solving, it is possible to
obtain very robust performance: our approach can solve more instances compared
with any solver that entered the 3rd ASP Competition. (To appear in Theory and
Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).)Comment: 26 pages, 8 figure
- …