48,251 research outputs found
Efficient and Reasonable Object-Oriented Concurrency
Making threaded programs safe and easy to reason about is one of the chief
difficulties in modern programming. This work provides an efficient execution
model for SCOOP, a concurrency approach that provides not only data race
freedom but also pre/postcondition reasoning guarantees between threads. The
extensions we propose influence both the underlying semantics to increase the
amount of concurrent execution that is possible, exclude certain classes of
deadlocks, and enable greater performance. These extensions are used as the
basis an efficient runtime and optimization pass that improve performance 15x
over a baseline implementation. This new implementation of SCOOP is also 2x
faster than other well-known safe concurrent languages. The measurements are
based on both coordination-intensive and data-manipulation-intensive benchmarks
designed to offer a mixture of workloads.Comment: Proceedings of the 10th Joint Meeting of the European Software
Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of
Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE '15). ACM, 201
Logic programming in the context of multiparadigm programming: the Oz experience
Oz is a multiparadigm language that supports logic programming as one of its
major paradigms. A multiparadigm language is designed to support different
programming paradigms (logic, functional, constraint, object-oriented,
sequential, concurrent, etc.) with equal ease. This article has two goals: to
give a tutorial of logic programming in Oz and to show how logic programming
fits naturally into the wider context of multiparadigm programming. Our
experience shows that there are two classes of problems, which we call
algorithmic and search problems, for which logic programming can help formulate
practical solutions. Algorithmic problems have known efficient algorithms.
Search problems do not have known efficient algorithms but can be solved with
search. The Oz support for logic programming targets these two problem classes
specifically, using the concepts needed for each. This is in contrast to the
Prolog approach, which targets both classes with one set of concepts, which
results in less than optimal support for each class. To explain the essential
difference between algorithmic and search programs, we define the Oz execution
model. This model subsumes both concurrent logic programming
(committed-choice-style) and search-based logic programming (Prolog-style).
Instead of Horn clause syntax, Oz has a simple, fully compositional,
higher-order syntax that accommodates the abilities of the language. We
conclude with lessons learned from this work, a brief history of Oz, and many
entry points into the Oz literature.Comment: 48 pages, to appear in the journal "Theory and Practice of Logic
Programming
The role of concurrency in an evolutionary view of programming abstractions
In this paper we examine how concurrency has been embodied in mainstream
programming languages. In particular, we rely on the evolutionary talking
borrowed from biology to discuss major historical landmarks and crucial
concepts that shaped the development of programming languages. We examine the
general development process, occasionally deepening into some language, trying
to uncover evolutionary lineages related to specific programming traits. We
mainly focus on concurrency, discussing the different abstraction levels
involved in present-day concurrent programming and emphasizing the fact that
they correspond to different levels of explanation. We then comment on the role
of theoretical research on the quest for suitable programming abstractions,
recalling the importance of changing the working framework and the way of
looking every so often. This paper is not meant to be a survey of modern
mainstream programming languages: it would be very incomplete in that sense. It
aims instead at pointing out a number of remarks and connect them under an
evolutionary perspective, in order to grasp a unifying, but not simplistic,
view of the programming languages development process
Implicit Invocation Meets Safe, Implicit Concurrency
Writing correct and efficient concurrent programs still remains a challenge. Explicit concurrency is difficult, error prone, and creates code which is hard to maintain and debug. This type of concurrency also treats modular program design and concurrency as separate goals, where modularity often suffers. To solve these problems, we are designing a new language that we call Panini. In this work, we focus on Panini\u27s asynchronous, typed events which reconcile the modularity goal promoted by the implicit invocation design style with the concurrency goal of exposing potential concurrency between the execution of subjects and observers. Since modularity is improved and concurrency is implicit in Panini, programs are easier to reason about and maintain. The language incorporates a static analysis to determine potential conflicts between handlers and a dynamic analysis which uses the conflict information to determine a safe order for handler invocation. This mechanism avoids races and deadlocks entirely, yielding programs with a guaranteed deterministic semantics. To evaluate our language design and implementation we show several examples of its usage as well as an empirical study of program performance. We found that not only is developing and understanding programs significantly easier compared to standard concurrent object-oriented programs, but also performance of Panini programs is comparable to their equivalent hand-tuned versions written using Java\u27s fork-join framework
A Graph-Based Semantics Workbench for Concurrent Asynchronous Programs
A number of novel programming languages and libraries have been proposed that
offer simpler-to-use models of concurrency than threads. It is challenging,
however, to devise execution models that successfully realise their
abstractions without forfeiting performance or introducing unintended
behaviours. This is exemplified by SCOOP---a concurrent object-oriented
message-passing language---which has seen multiple semantics proposed and
implemented over its evolution. We propose a "semantics workbench" with fully
and semi-automatic tools for SCOOP, that can be used to analyse and compare
programs with respect to different execution models. We demonstrate its use in
checking the consistency of semantics by applying it to a set of representative
programs, and highlighting a deadlock-related discrepancy between the principal
execution models of the language. Our workbench is based on a modular and
parameterisable graph transformation semantics implemented in the GROOVE tool.
We discuss how graph transformations are leveraged to atomically model
intricate language abstractions, and how the visual yet algebraic nature of the
model can be used to ascertain soundness.Comment: Accepted for publication in the proceedings of FASE 2016 (to appear
Handling Parallelism in a Concurrency Model
Programming models for concurrency are optimized for dealing with
nondeterminism, for example to handle asynchronously arriving events. To shield
the developer from data race errors effectively, such models may prevent shared
access to data altogether. However, this restriction also makes them unsuitable
for applications that require data parallelism. We present a library-based
approach for permitting parallel access to arrays while preserving the safety
guarantees of the original model. When applied to SCOOP, an object-oriented
concurrency model, the approach exhibits a negligible performance overhead
compared to ordinary threaded implementations of two parallel benchmark
programs.Comment: MUSEPAT 201
An Integrated Development Environment for Declarative Multi-Paradigm Programming
In this paper we present CIDER (Curry Integrated Development EnviRonment), an
analysis and programming environment for the declarative multi-paradigm
language Curry. CIDER is a graphical environment to support the development of
Curry programs by providing integrated tools for the analysis and visualization
of programs. CIDER is completely implemented in Curry using libraries for GUI
programming (based on Tcl/Tk) and meta-programming. An important aspect of our
environment is the possible adaptation of the development environment to other
declarative source languages (e.g., Prolog or Haskell) and the extensibility
w.r.t. new analysis methods. To support the latter feature, the lazy evaluation
strategy of the underlying implementation language Curry becomes quite useful.Comment: In A. Kusalik (ed), proceedings of the Eleventh International
Workshop on Logic Programming Environments (WLPE'01), December 1, 2001,
Paphos, Cyprus. cs.PL/011104
A study of systems implementation languages for the POCCNET system
The results are presented of a study of systems implementation languages for the Payload Operations Control Center Network (POCCNET). Criteria are developed for evaluating the languages, and fifteen existing languages are evaluated on the basis of these criteria
- …