Comparison of matroid intersection algorithms for large circuit analysis

This paper presents two approaches to symbolic analysis of large analog integrated circuits via simplification during the generation of the symbolic expressions. Both techniques are examined from the point of view of matroid theory. Finally, a new approach which combines the positive features of both approaches is introduced

A Family of matroid intersection algorithms for the computation of approximated symbolic network functions

In recent years, the technique of simplification during generation has turned out to be very promising for the efficient computation of approximate symbolic network functions for large transistor circuits. In this paper it is shown how symbolic network functions can be simplified during their generation with any well-known symbolic network analysis method. The underlying algorithm for the different techniques is always a matroid intersection algorithm. It is shown that the most efficient technique is the two-graph method. An implementation of the simplification during generation technique with the two-graph method illustrates its benefits for the symbolic analysis of large analog circuits

Symbolic analysis tools-the state of the art

This paper reviews the main last generation symbolic analyzers, comparing them in terms of functionality, pointing out also their shortcomings. The state of the art in this field is also studied, pointing out directions for future research

Behavioral Modeling of Mixed-Mode Integrated Circuits

Open Access.-- et al.This work is partially supported by CONACyT through the grant for the sabbatical stay of the first author at University of California at Riverside, during 2009-2010. The authors acknowledge the support from UC-MEXUS-CONACYT collaboration grant CN-09-310; by Promep México under the project UATLX-PTC-088, and by Consejeria de Innovacion Ciencia y Empresa, Junta de Andalucia, Spain, under the project number TIC-2532. The third author thanks the support of the JAE-Doc program of CSIC, co-funded by FSE.Peer Reviewe

On the complexity of nonlinear mixed-integer optimization

This is a survey on the computational complexity of nonlinear mixed-integer optimization. It highlights a selection of important topics, ranging from incomputability results that arise from number theory and logic, to recently obtained fully polynomial time approximation schemes in fixed dimension, and to strongly polynomial-time algorithms for special cases.Comment: 26 pages, 5 figures; to appear in: Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Optimization, IMA Volumes, Springer-Verla

Combinatorial Optimization

Combinatorial Optimization is an active research area that developed from the rich interaction among many mathematical areas, including combinatorics, graph theory, geometry, optimization, probability, theoretical computer science, and many others. It combines algorithmic and complexity analysis with a mature mathematical foundation and it yields both basic research and applications in manifold areas such as, for example, communications, economics, traffic, network design, VLSI, scheduling, production, computational biology, to name just a few. Through strong inner ties to other mathematical fields it has been contributing to and benefiting from areas such as, for example, discrete and convex geometry, convex and nonlinear optimization, algebraic and topological methods, geometry of numbers, matroids and combinatorics, and mathematical programming. Moreover, with respect to applications and algorithmic complexity, Combinatorial Optimization is an essential link between mathematics, computer science and modern applications in data science, economics, and industry

Matchings, matroids and submodular functions

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2008.Includes bibliographical references (p. 111-118).This thesis focuses on three fundamental problems in combinatorial optimization: non-bipartite matching, matroid intersection, and submodular function minimization. We develop simple, efficient, randomized algorithms for the first two problems, and prove new lower bounds for the last two problems. For the matching problem, we give an algorithm for constructing perfect or maximum cardinality matchings in non-bipartite graphs. Our algorithm requires O(n") time in graphs with n vertices, where w < 2.38 is the matrix multiplication exponent. This algorithm achieves the best-known running time for dense graphs, and it resolves an open question of Mucha and Sankowski (2004). For the matroid intersection problem, we give an algorithm for constructing a common base or maximum cardinality independent set for two so-called "linear" matroids. Our algorithm has running time O(nrw-1) for matroids with n elements and rank r. This is the best-known running time of any linear matroid intersection algorithm. We also consider lower bounds on the efficiency of matroid intersection algorithms, a question raised by Welsh (1976). Given two matroids of rank r on n elements, it is known that O(nr1.5) oracle queries suffice to solve matroid intersection. However, no non-trivial lower bounds are known. We make the first progress on this question. We describe a family of instances for which (log2 3)n - o(n) queries are necessary to solve these instances. This gives a constant factor improvement over the trivial lower bound for a certain range of parameters. Finally, we consider submodular functions, a generalization of matroids. We give three different proofs that [omega](n) queries are needed to find a minimizer of a submodular function, and prove that [omega](n2/ log n) queries are needed to find all minimizers.by Nicholas James Alexander Harvey.Ph.D