Resource Allocation in Survivable WDM Networks Under a Sliding Scheduled Traffic Model

In recent years there has been an increasing number of applications that require periodic use of lightpaths at predefined time intervals, such as database backup and on-line classes. A new traffic model, referred to as the scheduled traffic model, has been proposed to handle such scheduled lightpath demands. In this thesis we present two new integer linear program ( ILP) formulations for the more general sliding scheduled traffic model, where the setup and teardown times may vary within a specified range. We consider both wavelength convertible networks and networks without wavelength conversion capability. Our ILP formulations jointly optimize the problem of scheduling the demands ( in time) and allocating resources for the scheduled lightpaths. Simulation results show that our formulations are able to generate optimal solutions for practical sized networks. For larger networks, we have proposed a fast two-step heuristic to solve the demand scheduling problem and the RWA problem separately

Design and protection algorithms for path level aggregation of traffic in WDM metro optical networks

Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) promises to offer a cost effective and scalable solution to meet the emerging demands of the Internet. WDM splits the tremendous bandwidth latent in a fiber into multiple non-overlapping wavelength channels, each of which can be operated at the peak electronic rate. Commercial systems with 128 wavelengths and transmission rates of up to 40 Gbps per wavelength have been made possible using state of the art optical technologies to deal with physical impairments. Systems with higher capacities are likely to evolve in the future. The end user requirements for bandwidth, on the other hand, have been ranging from 155 Mbps to 2.5 Gbps. Dedicating a wavelength for each end user will lead to severe underutilization of WDM channels. This brings to forefront the requirement for sharing of bandwidth in a wavelength among multiple end users.;The concept of wavelength sharing among multiple clients is called grooming. Grooming can be done purely at the optical layer (optical grooming) or it can be done with support from the client layer (electronic grooming). The advantage of all optical grooming is the ease of scalability due to its transparency as opposed to electronic grooming which is constrained by electronic bottlenecks. Efforts towards enhancing optical grooming is pursued through increasing optical switching speeds. However, technologies to make optical switches with high speeds, large port counts and low insertion losses have been elusive and may continue to remain so in the near future.;Recently, there have been some research into designing new architectures and protocols focused on optical grooming without resorting to fast optical switching. Typically, this is achieved in three steps: (1) configure the circuit in the form of a path or a tree; (2) use optical devices like couplers or splitters to allow multiple transmitters and/or receivers to share the same circuit; and (3) provide an arbitration mechanism to avoid contention among end users of the circuit. This transparent sharing of the wavelength channel utilizes the network resources better than the conventional low-speed circuit switched approaches. Consequently, it becomes important to quantify the improvement in achieved performance and evaluate if the reaped benefits justify the cost of the required additional hardware and software.;The contribution of this thesis is two fold: (1) developing a new architecture called light-trails as an IP based solution for next generation WDM optical networks, and (2) designing a unified framework to model Path Level Aggregation of Traffic in metrO Optical Networks (PLATOONs). The algorithms suggested here have three features: (1) accounts for four different path level aggregation strategies---namely, point to point (for example, lightpaths), point to multi-point (for example, source based light-trails), multi-point to point (for example, destination based light-trails) and multi-point to multi-point (for example, light-trails); (2) incorporates heterogenous switching architectures; and (3) accommodates multi-rate traffic. Algorithms for network design and survivability are developed for PLATOONs in the presence of both static and dynamic traffic. Connection level dedicated/shared, segregated/mixed protection schemes are formulated for single link failures in the presence of static and dynamic traffic. A simple medium access control protocol that avoids collisions when the channel is shared by multiple clients is also proposed.;Based on extensive simulations, we conclude that, for the studied scenarios, (1) when client layer has no electronic grooming capabilities, light-trails (employing multi-point to multi-point aggregation strategy) perform several orders of magnitude better than lightpaths and (2) when client layer has full electronic grooming capabilities, source based light-trails (employing point to multi-point aggregation strategy) perform the best in wavelength limited scenarios and lightpaths perform the best in transceiver limited scenarios.;The algorithms that are developed here will be helpful in designing optical networks that deploy path level aggregation strategies. The proposed ideas will impact the design of transparent, high-speed all-optical networks.</p

Regenerator placement and fault management in multi-wavelength optical networks.

Shen, Dong.Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2011.Includes bibliographical references (p. 98-106).Abstracts in English and Chinese.Abstract --- p.i摘要 --- p.ivAcknowledgements --- p.vTable of Contents --- p.viChapter Chapter 1 --- Background --- p.1Chapter 1.1 --- Translucent Optical Networks --- p.1Chapter 1.1.1 --- The Way Towards Translucent --- p.1Chapter 1.1.2 --- Translucent Optical Network Architecture Design and Planning --- p.3Chapter 1.1.3 --- Other Research Topics in Translucent Optical Networks --- p.6Chapter 1.2 --- Fault Monitoring in All-Optical Networks --- p.12Chapter 1.2.1 --- Fault Monitoring in Network Layer's Perspective --- p.12Chapter 1.2.2 --- Passive Optical Monitoring --- p.14Chapter 1.2.3 --- Proactive Optical Monitoring --- p.16Chapter 1.3 --- Contributions --- p.17Chapter 1.3.1 --- Translucent Optical Network Planning with Heterogeneous Modulation Formats --- p.17Chapter 1.3.2 --- Multiplexing Optimization in Translucent Optical Networks --- p.19Chapter 1.3.3 --- An Efficient Regenerator Placement and Wavelength Assignment Scheme in Translucent Optical Networks --- p.20Chapter 1.3.4 --- Adaptive Fault Monitoring in All-Optical Networks Utilizing Real-Time Data Traffic --- p.20Chapter 1.4 --- Organization of Thesis --- p.22Chapter Chapter 2 --- Regenerator Placement and Resource Allocation Optimization in Translucent Optical Networks --- p.23Chapter 2.1 --- Introduction --- p.23Chapter 2.2 --- Translucent Optical Network Planning with Heterogeneous Modulation Formats --- p.25Chapter 2.2.1 --- Motivation and Problem Statements --- p.25Chapter 2.2.2 --- A Two-Step Planning Algorithm Using Two Modulation Formats to Realize Any-to-Any Topology Connectivity --- p.28Chapter 2.2.3 --- Illustrative Examples --- p.30Chapter 2.2.3 --- ILP Formulation of Minimizing Translucent Optical Network Cost with Two Modulation Formats under Static Traffic Demands --- p.34Chapter 2.2.4 --- Illustrative Numeric Examples --- p.42Chapter 2.3 --- Resource Allocation Optimization in Translucent Optical Networks --- p.45Chapter 2.3.1 --- Multiplexing Optimization with Auxiliary Graph --- p.45Chapter 2.3.2 --- Simulation Study of Proposed Algorithm --- p.51Chapter 2.3.3 --- An Efficient Regenerator Placement and Wavelength Assignment Solution --- p.55Chapter 2.3.4 --- Simulation Study of Proposed Algorithm --- p.60Chapter 2.4 --- Summary --- p.64Chapter Chapter 3 --- Adaptive Fault Monitoring in All-Optical Networks Utilizing Real-Time Data Traffic --- p.65Chapter 3.1 --- Introduction --- p.65Chapter 3.2 --- Adaptive Fault Monitoring --- p.68Chapter 3.2.1 --- System Framework --- p.68Chapter 3.2.2 --- Phase 1: Passive Monitoring --- p.70Chapter 3.2.3 --- Phase 2: Proactive Probing --- p.71Chapter 3.2.4 --- Control Plane Design and Analysis --- p.80Chapter 3.2.5 --- Physical Layer Implementation and Suggestions --- p.83Chapter 3.3 --- Placement of Label Monitors --- p.83Chapter 3.3.1 --- ILP Formulation --- p.84Chapter 3.3.2 --- Simulation Studies --- p.86Chapter 3.3.3 --- Discussion of Topology Evolution Adaptiveness --- p.93Chapter 3.4 --- Summary --- p.95Chapter Chapter 4 --- Conclusions and Future Work --- p.95Chapter 4.1 --- Conclusions --- p.96Chapter 4.2 --- Future Work --- p.97Bibliography --- p.98Publications during M.Phil Study --- p.10

Network design for IP-centric light-trail networks

We explore network design principles for next-generation all-optical wide-area networks, employing light-trail technology. Light-trail is a light-wave circuit that allows multiple nodes to share the optical bandwidth through the inclusion of simple but flexible hardware overlaid with a lightweight control protocol. We develop light-trails as a novel and amenable control and management solution to address IP-centric communication problems at the optical layer. We propose optical switch architectures that allow seamless integration of lightpath and light-trail networks, and assess their costs and capabilities. We formulate the static light-trail RWA problem as an integer linear program. Since this programming problem is computationally intractable, we split it into two subproblems: (a) trail routing, for which we provide three heuristics, (b) wavelength assignment, for which we use the largest first heuristic available in literature. The objective of our design is to minimize the optical layer and electronic layer costs in terms of the number of wavelengths and communication equipment required. We illustrate our approach by comparing the performance of our trail design heuristics on some test networks