645 research outputs found

    Post-mapping Topology Rewriting for FPGA Area Minimization

    Get PDF
    Circuit designers require Computer-Aided Design (CAD) tools when compiling designs into Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) in order to achieve high quality results due to the complexity of the compilation tasks involved. Technology mapping is one critical step in the FPGA CAD flow. The final mapping result has significant impact on the subsequent steps of clustering, placement and routing, for the objectives of delay, area and power dissipation. While depth-optimal FPGA technology mapping can be solved in polynomial time, area minimization has proven to be NP-hard. Most modern state-of-the-art FPGA technology mappers are structural in nature; they are based on cut enumeration and use various heuristics to yield depth and area minimized solutions. However, the results produced by structural technology mappers rely strongly on the structure of the input netlists. Hence, it is common to apply additional heuristics after technology mapping to further optimize area and reduce the amount of structural bias while not harming depth. Recently, SAT-based Boolean matching has been used for post-mapping area minimization. However, SAT-based matching is computationally complex and too time consuming in practice. This thesis proposes an alternative Boolean matching approach based on NPN equivalence. Using a library of pre-computed topologies, the matching problem becomes as simple as performing NPN encoding followed by a hash lookup which is very efficient. In conjunction with Ashenhurst decomposition, the NPN-based Boolean matching is allowed to handle up to 10-input Boolean functions. When applied to a large set of designs, the proposed algorithm yields, on average, more than 3% reduction in circuit area without harming circuit depth. The priori generation of a library of topologies can be difficult; the potential difficulty in generating a library of topologies represents one limitation of the proposed algorithm

    A Novel Basis for Logic Rewriting

    Get PDF
    Given a set of logic primitives and a Boolean function, exact synthesis finds the optimum representation (e.g., depth or size) of the function in terms of the primitives. Due to its high computational complexity, the use of exact synthesis is limited to small networks. Some logic rewriting algorithms use exact synthesis to replace small subnetworks by their optimum representations. However, conventional approaches have two major drawbacks. First, their scalability is limited, as Boolean functions are enumerated to precompute their optimum representations. Second, the strategies used to replace subnetworks are not satisfactory. We show how the use of exact synthesis for logic rewriting can be improved. To this end, we propose a novel method that includes various improvements over conventional approaches: (i) we improve the subnetwork selection strategy, (ii) we show how enumeration can be avoided, allowing our method to scale to larger subnetworks, and (iii) we introduce XOR Majority Graphs (XMGs) as compact logic representations that make exact synthesis more efficient. We show a 45.8% geometric mean reduction (taken over size, depth, and switching activity), a 6.5% size reduction, and depth · size reductions of 8.6%, compared to the academic state-of-the-art. Finally, we outperform 3 over 9 of the best known size results for the EPFL benchmark suite, reducing size by up to 11.5% and depth up to 46.7%
    • …
    corecore