Computer-aided programming for multiprocessing systems

As both the number of processors and the complexity of problems to be solved increase, programming multiprocessing systems becomes more difficult and error-prone. This report discusses parallel models of computation and tools for computer-aided programming (CAP). Program development tools are necessary since programmers are not able to develop complex parallel programs efficiently. In particular, a CAP tool, named Hypertool, is described here. It performs scheduling and handles the communication primitive insertion automatically so that many errors are eliminated. It also generates the performance estimates and other program quality measures to help programmers in improving their algorithms and programs. Experiments have shown that up to a 300% performance improvement can be achieved by computer-aided programming

Computing Invariants with Transformers: Experimental Scalability and Accuracy

International audienceUsing abstract interpretation, invariants are usually obtained by solving iteratively a system of equations linking preconditions according to program statements. However, it is also possible to abstract first the statements as transformers, and then propagate the preconditions using the transformers. The second approach is modular because procedures and loops can be abstracted once and for all, avoiding an iterative resolution over the call graph and all the control flow graphs. However, the transformer approach based on polyhedral abstract domains encurs two penalties: some invariant accuracy may be lost when computing transformers, and the execution time may increase exponentially because the dimension of a transformer is twice the dimension of a precondition. The purposes of this article are 1) to measure the benefits of the modular approach and its drawbacks in terms of execution time and accuracy using significant examples and a newly developed benchmark for loop invariant analysis, ALICe, 2) to present a new technique designed to reduce the accuracy loss when computing transformers, 3) to evaluate experimentally the accuracy gains this new technique and other previously discussed ones provide with ALICe test cases and 4) to compare the executions times and accuracies of different tools, ASPIC, ISL, PAGAI and PIPS. Our results suggest that the transformer-based approach used in PIPS, once improved with transformer lists, is as accurate as the other tools when dealing with the ALICe benchmark. Its modularity nevertheless leads to shorter execution times when dealing with nested loops and procedure calls found in real applications

Performance Estimation for Task Graphs Combining Sequential Path Profiling and Control Dependence Regions

The speed-up estimation of parallelized code is crucial to efficiently compare different parallelization techniques or task graph transformations. Unfortunately, most of the time, during the parallelization of a specification, the information that can be extracted by profiling the corresponding sequential code (e.g. the most executed paths) are not properly taken into account. In particular, correlating sequential path profiling with the corresponding parallelized code can help in the identification of code hot spots, opening new possibilities for automatic parallelization. For this reason, starting from a well-known profiling technique, the Efficient Path Profiling, we propose a methodology that estimates the speed-up of a parallelized specification, just using the corresponding hierarchical task graph representation and the information coming from the dynamic profiling of the initial sequential specification. Experimental results show that the proposed solution outperforms existing approaches