Crowd Counting with Decomposed Uncertainty

Research in neural networks in the field of computer vision has achieved remarkable accuracy for point estimation. However, the uncertainty in the estimation is rarely addressed. Uncertainty quantification accompanied by point estimation can lead to a more informed decision, and even improve the prediction quality. In this work, we focus on uncertainty estimation in the domain of crowd counting. With increasing occurrences of heavily crowded events such as political rallies, protests, concerts, etc., automated crowd analysis is becoming an increasingly crucial task. The stakes can be very high in many of these real-world applications. We propose a scalable neural network framework with quantification of decomposed uncertainty using a bootstrap ensemble. We demonstrate that the proposed uncertainty quantification method provides additional insight to the crowd counting problem and is simple to implement. We also show that our proposed method exhibits the state of the art performances in many benchmark crowd counting datasets.Comment: Accepted in AAAI 2020 (Main Technical Track

Training-Free Uncertainty Estimation for Dense Regression: Sensitivity as a Surrogate

Uncertainty estimation is an essential step in the evaluation of the robustness for deep learning models in computer vision, especially when applied in risk-sensitive areas. However, most state-of-the-art deep learning models either fail to obtain uncertainty estimation or need significant modification (e.g., formulating a proper Bayesian treatment) to obtain it. Most previous methods are not able to take an arbitrary model off the shelf and generate uncertainty estimation without retraining or redesigning it. To address this gap, we perform a systematic exploration into training-free uncertainty estimation for dense regression, an unrecognized yet important problem, and provide a theoretical construction justifying such estimations. We propose three simple and scalable methods to analyze the variance of outputs from a trained network under tolerable perturbations: infer-transformation, infer-noise, and infer-dropout. They operate solely during inference, without the need to re-train, re-design, or fine-tune the model, as typically required by state-of-the-art uncertainty estimation methods. Surprisingly, even without involving such perturbations in training, our methods produce comparable or even better uncertainty estimation when compared to training-required state-of-the-art methods.Comment: 18 pages, 13 figure

When the machine does not know measuring uncertainty in deep learning models of medical images

This thesis was submitted for the award of Doctor of Philosophy and was awarded by Brunel University LondonRecently, Deep learning (DL), which involves powerful black box predictors, has outperformed human experts in several medical diagnostic problems. However, these methods focus exclusively on improving the accuracy of point predictions without assessing their outputs’ quality and ignore the asymmetric cost involved in different types of misclassification errors. Neural networks also do not deliver confidence in predictions and suffer from over and under confidence, i.e. are not well calibrated. Knowing how much confidence there is in a prediction is essential for gaining clinicians’ trust in the technology. Calibrated uncertainty quantification is a challenging problem as no ground truth is available. To address this, we make two observations: (i) cost-sensitive deep neural networks with Dropweights models better quantify calibrated predictive uncertainty, and (ii) estimated uncertainty with point predictions in Deep Ensembles Bayesian Neural Networks with DropWeights can lead to a more informed decision and improve prediction quality. This dissertation focuses on quantifying uncertainty using concepts from cost-sensitive neural networks, calibration of confidence, and Dropweights ensemble method. First, we show how to improve predictive uncertainty by deep ensembles of neural networks with Dropweights learning an approximate distribution over its weights in medical image segmentation and its application in active learning. Second, we use the Jackknife resampling technique to correct bias in quantified uncertainty in image classification and propose metrics to measure uncertainty performance. The third part of the thesis is motivated by the discrepancy between the model predictive error and the objective in quantified uncertainty when costs for misclassification errors or unbalanced datasets are asymmetric. We develop cost-sensitive modifications of the neural networks in disease detection and propose metrics to measure the quality of quantified uncertainty. Finally, we leverage an adaptive binning strategy to measure uncertainty calibration error that directly corresponds to estimated uncertainty performance and address problematic evaluation methods. We evaluate the effectiveness of the tools on nuclei images segmentation, multi-class Brain MRI image classification, multi-level cell type-specific protein expression prediction in ImmunoHistoChemistry (IHC) images and cost-sensitive classification for Covid-19 detection from X-Rays and CT image dataset. Our approach is thoroughly validated by measuring the quality of uncertainty. It produces an equally good or better result and paves the way for the future that addresses the practical problems at the intersection of deep learning and Bayesian decision theory. In conclusion, our study highlights the opportunities and challenges of the application of estimated uncertainty in deep learning models of medical images, representing the confidence of the model’s prediction, and the uncertainty quality metrics show a significant improvement when using Deep Ensembles Bayesian Neural Networks with DropWeights

Can input reconstruction be used to directly estimate uncertainty of a regression U-Net model? -- Application to proton therapy dose prediction for head and neck cancer patients

Estimating the uncertainty of deep learning models in a reliable and efficient way has remained an open problem, where many different solutions have been proposed in the literature. Most common methods are based on Bayesian approximations, like Monte Carlo dropout (MCDO) or Deep ensembling (DE), but they have a high inference time (i.e. require multiple inference passes) and might not work for out-of-distribution detection (OOD) data (i.e. similar uncertainty for in-distribution (ID) and OOD). In safety critical environments, like medical applications, accurate and fast uncertainty estimation methods, able to detect OOD data, are crucial, since wrong predictions can jeopardize patients safety. In this study, we present an alternative direct uncertainty estimation method and apply it for a regression U-Net architecture. The method consists in the addition of a branch from the bottleneck which reconstructs the input. The input reconstruction error can be used as a surrogate of the model uncertainty. For the proof-of-concept, our method is applied to proton therapy dose prediction in head and neck cancer patients. Accuracy, time-gain, and OOD detection are analyzed for our method in this particular application and compared with the popular MCDO and DE. The input reconstruction method showed a higher Pearson correlation coefficient with the prediction error (0.620) than DE and MCDO (between 0.447 and 0.612). Moreover, our method allows an easier identification of OOD (Z-score of 34.05). It estimates the uncertainty simultaneously to the regression task, therefore requires less time or computational resources.Comment: 11 pages, 3 figures and 3 Table

Exploring variability in medical imaging

Although recent successes of deep learning and novel machine learning techniques improved the perfor- mance of classification and (anomaly) detection in computer vision problems, the application of these methods in medical imaging pipeline remains a very challenging task. One of the main reasons for this is the amount of variability that is encountered and encapsulated in human anatomy and subsequently reflected in medical images. This fundamental factor impacts most stages in modern medical imaging processing pipelines. Variability of human anatomy makes it virtually impossible to build large datasets for each disease with labels and annotation for fully supervised machine learning. An efficient way to cope with this is to try and learn only from normal samples. Such data is much easier to collect. A case study of such an automatic anomaly detection system based on normative learning is presented in this work. We present a framework for detecting fetal cardiac anomalies during ultrasound screening using generative models, which are trained only utilising normal/healthy subjects. However, despite the significant improvement in automatic abnormality detection systems, clinical routine continues to rely exclusively on the contribution of overburdened medical experts to diagnosis and localise abnormalities. Integrating human expert knowledge into the medical imaging processing pipeline entails uncertainty which is mainly correlated with inter-observer variability. From the per- spective of building an automated medical imaging system, it is still an open issue, to what extent this kind of variability and the resulting uncertainty are introduced during the training of a model and how it affects the final performance of the task. Consequently, it is very important to explore the effect of inter-observer variability both, on the reliable estimation of model’s uncertainty, as well as on the model’s performance in a specific machine learning task. A thorough investigation of this issue is presented in this work by leveraging automated estimates for machine learning model uncertainty, inter-observer variability and segmentation task performance in lung CT scan images. Finally, a presentation of an overview of the existing anomaly detection methods in medical imaging was attempted. This state-of-the-art survey includes both conventional pattern recognition methods and deep learning based methods. It is one of the first literature surveys attempted in the specific research area.Open Acces