2,175 research outputs found
Rate of Price Discovery in Iterative Combinatorial Auctions
We study a class of iterative combinatorial auctions which can be viewed as
subgradient descent methods for the problem of pricing bundles to balance
supply and demand. We provide concrete convergence rates for auctions in this
class, bounding the number of auction rounds needed to reach clearing prices.
Our analysis allows for a variety of pricing schemes, including item, bundle,
and polynomial pricing, and the respective convergence rates confirm that more
expressive pricing schemes come at the cost of slower convergence. We consider
two models of bidder behavior. In the first model, bidders behave
stochastically according to a random utility model, which includes standard
best-response bidding as a special case. In the second model, bidders behave
arbitrarily (even adversarially), and meaningful convergence relies on properly
designed activity rules
Efficiency Guarantees in Auctions with Budgets
In settings where players have a limited access to liquidity, represented in
the form of budget constraints, efficiency maximization has proven to be a
challenging goal. In particular, the social welfare cannot be approximated by a
better factor then the number of players. Therefore, the literature has mainly
resorted to Pareto-efficiency as a way to achieve efficiency in such settings.
While successful in some important scenarios, in many settings it is known that
either exactly one incentive-compatible auction that always outputs a
Pareto-efficient solution, or that no truthful mechanism can always guarantee a
Pareto-efficient outcome. Traditionally, impossibility results can be avoided
by considering approximations. However, Pareto-efficiency is a binary property
(is either satisfied or not), which does not allow for approximations.
In this paper we propose a new notion of efficiency, called \emph{liquid
welfare}. This is the maximum amount of revenue an omniscient seller would be
able to extract from a certain instance. We explain the intuition behind this
objective function and show that it can be 2-approximated by two different
auctions. Moreover, we show that no truthful algorithm can guarantee an
approximation factor better than 4/3 with respect to the liquid welfare, and
provide a truthful auction that attains this bound in a special case.
Importantly, the liquid welfare benchmark also overcomes impossibilities for
some settings. While it is impossible to design Pareto-efficient auctions for
multi-unit auctions where players have decreasing marginal values, we give a
deterministic -approximation for the liquid welfare in this setting
Allocation in Practice
How do we allocate scarcere sources? How do we fairly allocate costs? These
are two pressing challenges facing society today. I discuss two recent projects
at NICTA concerning resource and cost allocation. In the first, we have been
working with FoodBank Local, a social startup working in collaboration with
food bank charities around the world to optimise the logistics of collecting
and distributing donated food. Before we can distribute this food, we must
decide how to allocate it to different charities and food kitchens. This gives
rise to a fair division problem with several new dimensions, rarely considered
in the literature. In the second, we have been looking at cost allocation
within the distribution network of a large multinational company. This also has
several new dimensions rarely considered in the literature.Comment: To appear in Proc. of 37th edition of the German Conference on
Artificial Intelligence (KI 2014), Springer LNC
Putting auction theory to work : the simultaneous ascending auction
The"simultaneous ascending auction"was first introduced in 1994 to sell licenses to use bands of radio spectrum in the United States. Much of the attention devoted to the auction came from its role in reducing federal regulation of the radio spectrum and allowing market values, rather than administrative fiat, to determine who would use the spectrum resource. Several parts of economic theory proved helpful in designing the rules for simultaneous ascending auction and in thinking about how the design might be improved and adapted for new applications. After briefly reviewing the major rules of the auction in section 2, the author turns in section 3 to an analysis based on tatonnement theory, which regards the auction as a mechanism for discovering an efficient allocation and its supporting prices. The analysis reveals a fundamental difference between situations in which the licenses are mutual substitutes and others in which the same licenses are sometimes substitutes and sometimes complements. Section 4 is a selective account of some applications of game theory to evaluating the simultaneous ascending auction design for spectrum sales. Results like those reported in section 3 have led to renewed interest in auctions in which bids for license packages are permitted. In section 5, the author uses game theory to analyze the biases in a leading proposal for dynamic combinatorial bidding. Section 6 briefly answers two additional questions that economists often ask about auction design: If trading of licenses after the auction is allowed, why does the auction form matter at all for promoting efficient license assignments? Holding fixed the quantity of licenses to be sold, how sharp is the conflict between the objectives of assigning licenses efficiently and obtaining maximum revenue? Section 7 concludes.Economic Theory&Research,International Terrorism&Counterterrorism,Markets and Market Access,Environmental Economics&Policies,Labor Policies,Markets and Market Access,Access to Markets,Economic Theory&Research,Environmental Economics&Policies,International Terrorism&Counterterrorism
Mechanisms for Risk Averse Agents, Without Loss
Auctions in which agents' payoffs are random variables have received
increased attention in recent years. In particular, recent work in algorithmic
mechanism design has produced mechanisms employing internal randomization,
partly in response to limitations on deterministic mechanisms imposed by
computational complexity. For many of these mechanisms, which are often
referred to as truthful-in-expectation, incentive compatibility is contingent
on the assumption that agents are risk-neutral. These mechanisms have been
criticized on the grounds that this assumption is too strong, because "real"
agents are typically risk averse, and moreover their precise attitude towards
risk is typically unknown a-priori. In response, researchers in algorithmic
mechanism design have sought the design of universally-truthful mechanisms ---
mechanisms for which incentive-compatibility makes no assumptions regarding
agents' attitudes towards risk.
We show that any truthful-in-expectation mechanism can be generically
transformed into a mechanism that is incentive compatible even when agents are
risk averse, without modifying the mechanism's allocation rule. The transformed
mechanism does not require reporting of agents' risk profiles. Equivalently,
our result can be stated as follows: Every (randomized) allocation rule that is
implementable in dominant strategies when players are risk neutral is also
implementable when players are endowed with an arbitrary and unknown concave
utility function for money.Comment: Presented at the workshop on risk aversion in algorithmic game theory
and mechanism design, held in conjunction with EC 201
Constrained Signaling in Auction Design
We consider the problem of an auctioneer who faces the task of selling a good
(drawn from a known distribution) to a set of buyers, when the auctioneer does
not have the capacity to describe to the buyers the exact identity of the good
that he is selling. Instead, he must come up with a constrained signalling
scheme: a (non injective) mapping from goods to signals, that satisfies the
constraints of his setting. For example, the auctioneer may be able to
communicate only a bounded length message for each good, or he might be legally
constrained in how he can advertise the item being sold. Each candidate
signaling scheme induces an incomplete-information game among the buyers, and
the goal of the auctioneer is to choose the signaling scheme and accompanying
auction format that optimizes welfare. In this paper, we use techniques from
submodular function maximization and no-regret learning to give algorithms for
computing constrained signaling schemes for a variety of constrained signaling
problems
Designing Coalition-Proof Reverse Auctions over Continuous Goods
This paper investigates reverse auctions that involve continuous values of
different types of goods, general nonconvex constraints, and second stage
costs. We seek to design the payment rules and conditions under which
coalitions of participants cannot influence the auction outcome in order to
obtain higher collective utility. Under the incentive-compatible
Vickrey-Clarke-Groves mechanism, we show that coalition-proof outcomes are
achieved if the submitted bids are convex and the constraint sets are of a
polymatroid-type. These conditions, however, do not capture the complexity of
the general class of reverse auctions under consideration. By relaxing the
property of incentive-compatibility, we investigate further payment rules that
are coalition-proof without any extra conditions on the submitted bids and the
constraint sets. Since calculating the payments directly for these mechanisms
is computationally difficult for auctions involving many participants, we
present two computationally efficient methods. Our results are verified with
several case studies based on electricity market data
Recommended from our members
Centralized versus market-based approaches to mobile task allocation problem: State-of-the-art
Centralized approach has been adopted for finding solutions to resource allocation problems (RAPs) in many real-life applications. On the other hand, market-based approach has been proposed as an alternative to solve the problem due to recent advancement in ICT technologies. In spite of the existence of some efforts to review the pros and cons of each approach in RAPs, the studies cannot be directly applied to specific problem domains like mobile task allocation problem which is characterised with high level of uncertainty on the availability of resources (workers). This paper aims to review existing studies on task allocation problems(TAPs) focusing on those two approaches and their comparison and identify major issues that need to be resolved for comparing the two approaches in mobile task allocation problems. Mobile Task Allocation Problem (MTAP) is defined and its problematic structures are explained in relation with task allocation to mobile workers. Solutions produced by each approach to some applications and variations of MTAP are also discussed and compared. Finally, some future research directions are identified in order to compare both approaches in function of uncertainty emerging from the mobile nature of the MTAP
- âŠ