3,527 research outputs found
Named Entity Extraction and Disambiguation: The Reinforcement Effect.
Named entity extraction and disambiguation have received much attention in recent years. Typical fields addressing these topics are information retrieval, natural language processing, and semantic web. Although these topics are highly dependent, almost no existing works examine this dependency. It is the aim of this paper to examine the dependency and show how one affects the other, and vice versa. We conducted experiments with a set of descriptions of holiday homes with the aim to extract and disambiguate toponyms as a representative example of named entities. We experimented with three approaches for disambiguation with the purpose to infer the country of the holiday home. We examined how the effectiveness of extraction influences the effectiveness of disambiguation, and reciprocally, how filtering out ambiguous names (an activity that depends on the disambiguation process) improves the effectiveness of extraction. Since this, in turn, may improve the effectiveness of disambiguation again, it shows that extraction and disambiguation may reinforce each other.\u
Entity Linking for Queries by Searching Wikipedia Sentences
We present a simple yet effective approach for linking entities in queries.
The key idea is to search sentences similar to a query from Wikipedia articles
and directly use the human-annotated entities in the similar sentences as
candidate entities for the query. Then, we employ a rich set of features, such
as link-probability, context-matching, word embeddings, and relatedness among
candidate entities as well as their related entities, to rank the candidates
under a regression based framework. The advantages of our approach lie in two
aspects, which contribute to the ranking process and final linking result.
First, it can greatly reduce the number of candidate entities by filtering out
irrelevant entities with the words in the query. Second, we can obtain the
query sensitive prior probability in addition to the static link-probability
derived from all Wikipedia articles. We conduct experiments on two benchmark
datasets on entity linking for queries, namely the ERD14 dataset and the GERDAQ
dataset. Experimental results show that our method outperforms state-of-the-art
systems and yields 75.0% in F1 on the ERD14 dataset and 56.9% on the GERDAQ
dataset
Distantly Labeling Data for Large Scale Cross-Document Coreference
Cross-document coreference, the problem of resolving entity mentions across
multi-document collections, is crucial to automated knowledge base construction
and data mining tasks. However, the scarcity of large labeled data sets has
hindered supervised machine learning research for this task. In this paper we
develop and demonstrate an approach based on ``distantly-labeling'' a data set
from which we can train a discriminative cross-document coreference model. In
particular we build a dataset of more than a million people mentions extracted
from 3.5 years of New York Times articles, leverage Wikipedia for distant
labeling with a generative model (and measure the reliability of such
labeling); then we train and evaluate a conditional random field coreference
model that has factors on cross-document entities as well as mention-pairs.
This coreference model obtains high accuracy in resolving mentions and entities
that are not present in the training data, indicating applicability to
non-Wikipedia data. Given the large amount of data, our work is also an
exercise demonstrating the scalability of our approach.Comment: 16 pages, submitted to ECML 201
Computational Approaches to Measuring the Similarity of Short Contexts : A Review of Applications and Methods
Measuring the similarity of short written contexts is a fundamental problem
in Natural Language Processing. This article provides a unifying framework by
which short context problems can be categorized both by their intended
application and proposed solution. The goal is to show that various problems
and methodologies that appear quite different on the surface are in fact very
closely related. The axes by which these categorizations are made include the
format of the contexts (headed versus headless), the way in which the contexts
are to be measured (first-order versus second-order similarity), and the
information used to represent the features in the contexts (micro versus macro
views). The unifying thread that binds together many short context applications
and methods is the fact that similarity decisions must be made between contexts
that share few (if any) words in common.Comment: 23 page
- …