Uniform Interpolation for Coalgebraic Fixpoint Logic

We use the connection between automata and logic to prove that a wide class of coalgebraic fixpoint logics enjoys uniform interpolation. To this aim, first we generalize one of the central results in coalgebraic automata theory, namely closure under projection, which is known to hold for weak-pullback preserving functors, to a more general class of functors, i.e.; functors with quasi-functorial lax extensions. Then we will show that closure under projection implies definability of the bisimulation quantifier in the language of coalgebraic fixpoint logic, and finally we prove the uniform interpolation theorem

Living without Beth and Craig: Definitions and Interpolants in the Guarded and Two-Variable Fragments

In logics with the Craig interpolation property (CIP) the existence of an interpolant for an implication follows from the validity of the implication. In logics with the projective Beth definability property (PBDP), the existence of an explicit definition of a relation follows from the validity of a formula expressing its implicit definability. The two-variable fragment, FO2, and the guarded fragment, GF, of first-order logic both fail to have the CIP and the PBDP. We show that nevertheless in both fragments the existence of interpolants and explicit definitions is decidable. In GF, both problems are 3ExpTime-complete in general, and 2ExpTime-complete if the arity of relation symbols is bounded by a constant c not smaller than 3. In FO2, we prove a coN2ExpTime upper bound and a 2ExpTime lower bound for both problems. Thus, both for GF and FO2 existence of interpolants and explicit definitions are decidable but harder than validity (in case of FO2 under standard complexity assumptions)

Changing a semantics: opportunism or courage?

The generalized models for higher-order logics introduced by Leon Henkin, and their multiple offspring over the years, have become a standard tool in many areas of logic. Even so, discussion has persisted about their technical status, and perhaps even their conceptual legitimacy. This paper gives a systematic view of generalized model techniques, discusses what they mean in mathematical and philosophical terms, and presents a few technical themes and results about their role in algebraic representation, calibrating provability, lowering complexity, understanding fixed-point logics, and achieving set-theoretic absoluteness. We also show how thinking about Henkin's approach to semantics of logical systems in this generality can yield new results, dispelling the impression of adhocness. This paper is dedicated to Leon Henkin, a deep logician who has changed the way we all work, while also being an always open, modest, and encouraging colleague and friend.Comment: 27 pages. To appear in: The life and work of Leon Henkin: Essays on his contributions (Studies in Universal Logic) eds: Manzano, M., Sain, I. and Alonso, E., 201

Conservative Extensions and Satisfiability in Fragments of First-Order Logic : Complexity and Expressive Power

In this thesis, we investigate the decidability and computational complexity of (deductive) conservative extensions in expressive fragments of first-order logic, such as two-variable and guarded fragments. Moreover, we also investigate the complexity of (query) conservative extensions in Horn description logics with inverse roles. Aditionally, we investigate the computational complexity of the satisfiability problem in the unary negation fragment of first-order logic extended with regular path expressions. Besides complexity results, we also study the expressive power of relation-changing modal logics. In particular, we provide translations intto hybrid logic and compare their expressive power using appropriate notions of bisimulations

Synthesizing Nested Relational Queries from Implicit Specifications

Derived datasets can be defined implicitly or explicitly. An implicit definition (of dataset $O$ in terms of datasets $\vec{I}$) is a logical specification involving the source data $\vec{I}$ and the interface data $O$. It is a valid definition of $O$ in terms of $\vec{I}$, if any two models of the specification agreeing on $\vec{I}$ agree on $O$. In contrast, an explicit definition is a query that produces $O$ from $\vec{I}$. Variants of Beth's theorem state that one can convert implicit definitions to explicit ones. Further, this conversion can be done effectively given a proof witnessing implicit definability in a suitable proof system. We prove the analogous effective implicit-to-explicit result for nested relations: implicit definitions, given in the natural logic for nested relations, can be effectively converted to explicit definitions in the nested relational calculus NRC. As a consequence, we can effectively extract rewritings of NRC queries in terms of NRC views, given a proof witnessing that the query is determined by the views