On QBF Proofs and Preprocessing

QBFs (quantified boolean formulas), which are a superset of propositional formulas, provide a canonical representation for PSPACE problems. To overcome the inherent complexity of QBF, significant effort has been invested in developing QBF solvers as well as the underlying proof systems. At the same time, formula preprocessing is crucial for the application of QBF solvers. This paper focuses on a missing link in currently-available technology: How to obtain a certificate (e.g. proof) for a formula that had been preprocessed before it was given to a solver? The paper targets a suite of commonly-used preprocessing techniques and shows how to reconstruct certificates for them. On the negative side, the paper discusses certain limitations of the currently-used proof systems in the light of preprocessing. The presented techniques were implemented and evaluated in the state-of-the-art QBF preprocessor bloqqer.Comment: LPAR 201

Learning for Dynamic subsumption

In this paper a new dynamic subsumption technique for Boolean CNF formulae is proposed. It exploits simple and sufficient conditions to detect during conflict analysis, clauses from the original formula that can be reduced by subsumption. During the learnt clause derivation, and at each step of the resolution process, we simply check for backward subsumption between the current resolvent and clauses from the original formula and encoded in the implication graph. Our approach give rise to a strong and dynamic simplification technique that exploits learning to eliminate literals from the original clauses. Experimental results show that the integration of our dynamic subsumption approach within the state-of-the-art SAT solvers Minisat and Rsat achieves interesting improvements particularly on crafted instances

k-Step Relative Inductive Generalization

We introduce a new form of SAT-based symbolic model checking. One common idea in SAT-based symbolic model checking is to generate new clauses from states that can lead to property violations. Our previous work suggests applying induction to generalize from such states. While effective on some benchmarks, the main problem with inductive generalization is that not all such states can be inductively generalized at a given time in the analysis, resulting in long searches for generalizable states on some benchmarks. This paper introduces the idea of inductively generalizing states relative to $k$-step over-approximations: a given state is inductively generalized relative to the latest $k$-step over-approximation relative to which the negation of the state is itself inductive. This idea motivates an algorithm that inductively generalizes a given state at the highest level $k$ so far examined, possibly by generating more than one mutually $k$-step relative inductive clause. We present experimental evidence that the algorithm is effective in practice.Comment: 14 page

Effectiveness of pre- and inprocessing for CDCL-based SAT solving

Applying pre- and inprocessing techniques to simplify CNF formulas both before and during search can considerably improve the performance of modern SAT solvers. These algorithms mostly aim at reducing the number of clauses, literals, and variables in the formula. However, to be worthwhile, it is necessary that their additional runtime does not exceed the runtime saved during the subsequent SAT solver execution. In this paper we investigate the efficiency and the practicability of selected simplification algorithms for CDCL-based SAT solving. We first analyze them by means of their expected impact on the CNF formula and SAT solving at all. While testing them on real-world and combinatorial SAT instances, we show which techniques and combinations of them yield a desirable speedup and which ones should be avoided

Partial Quantifier Elimination

We consider the problem of Partial Quantifier Elimination (PQE). Given formula exists(X)[F(X,Y) & G(X,Y)], where F, G are in conjunctive normal form, the PQE problem is to find a formula F*(Y) such that F* & exists(X)[G] is logically equivalent to exists(X)[F & G]. We solve the PQE problem by generating and adding to F clauses over the free variables that make the clauses of F with quantified variables redundant. The traditional Quantifier Elimination problem (QE) is a special case of PQE where G is empty so all clauses of the input formula with quantified variables need to be made redundant. The importance of PQE is twofold. First, many problems are more naturally formulated in terms of PQE rather than QE. Second, in many cases PQE can be solved more efficiently than QE. We describe a PQE algorithm based on the machinery of dependency sequents and give experimental results showing the promise of PQE

Limits of Preprocessing

We present a first theoretical analysis of the power of polynomial-time preprocessing for important combinatorial problems from various areas in AI. We consider problems from Constraint Satisfaction, Global Constraints, Satisfiability, Nonmonotonic and Bayesian Reasoning. We show that, subject to a complexity theoretic assumption, none of the considered problems can be reduced by polynomial-time preprocessing to a problem kernel whose size is polynomial in a structural problem parameter of the input, such as induced width or backdoor size. Our results provide a firm theoretical boundary for the performance of polynomial-time preprocessing algorithms for the considered problems.Comment: This is a slightly longer version of a paper that appeared in the proceedings of AAAI 201