Function Verification of Combinational Arithmetic Circuits

Hardware design verification is the most challenging part in overall hardware design process. It is because design size and complexity are growing very fast while the requirement for performance is ever higher. Conventional simulation-based verification method cannot keep up with the rapid increase in the design size, since it is impossible to exhaustively test all input vectors of a complex design. An important part of hardware verification is combinational arithmetic circuit verification. It draws a lot of attention because flattening the design into bit-level, known as the bit-blasting problem, hinders the efficiency of many current formal techniques. The goal of this thesis is to introduce a robust and efficient formal verification method for combinational integer arithmetic circuit based on an in-depth analysis of recent advances in computer algebra. The method proposed here solves the verification problem at bit level, while avoiding bit-blasting problem. It also avoids the expensive Groebner basis computation, typically employed by symbolic computer algebra methods. The proposed method verifies the gate-level implementation of the design by representing the design components (logic gates and arithmetic modules) by polynomials in Z2n . It then transforms the polynomial representing the output bits (called “output signature”) into a unique polynomial in input signals (called “input signature”) using gate-level information of the design. The computed input signature is then compared with the reference input signature (golden model) to determine whether the circuit behaves as anticipated. If the reference input signature is not given, our method can be used to compute (or extract) the arithmetic function of the design by computing its input signature. Additional tools, based on canonical word-level design representations (such as TED or BMD) can be used to determine the function of the computed input signature represents. We demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method to arithmetic circuit verification on a large number of designs

Formal Analysis of Arithmetic Circuits using Computer Algebra - Verification, Abstraction and Reverse Engineering

Despite a considerable progress in verification and abstraction of random and control logic, advances in formal verification of arithmetic designs have been lagging. This can be attributed mostly to the difficulty in an efficient modeling of arithmetic circuits and datapaths without resorting to computationally expensive Boolean methods, such as Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs) and Boolean Satisfiability (SAT), that require “bit blasting”, i.e., flattening the design to a bit-level netlist. Approaches that rely on computer algebra and Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) methods are either too abstract to handle the bit-level nature of arithmetic designs or require solving computationally expensive decision or satisfiability problems. The work proposed in this thesis aims at overcoming the limitations of analyzing arithmetic circuits, specifically at the post-synthesized phase. It addresses the verification, abstraction and reverse engineering problems of arithmetic circuits at an algebraic level, treating an arithmetic circuit and its specification as a properly constructed algebraic system. The proposed technique solves these problems by function extraction, i.e., by deriving arithmetic function computed by the circuit from its low-level circuit implementation using computer algebraic rewriting technique. The proposed techniques work on large integer arithmetic circuits and finite field arithmetic circuits, up to 512-bit wide containing millions of logic gates

Doctor of Philosophy

dissertationFormal verification of hardware designs has become an essential component of the overall system design flow. The designs are generally modeled as finite state machines, on which property and equivalence checking problems are solved for verification. Reachability analysis forms the core of these techniques. However, increasing size and complexity of the circuits causes the state explosion problem. Abstraction is the key to tackling the scalability challenges. This dissertation presents new techniques for word-level abstraction with applications in sequential design verification. By bundling together k bit-level state-variables into one word-level constraint expression, the state-space is construed as solutions (variety) to a set of polynomial constraints (ideal), modeled over the finite (Galois) field of 2^k elements. Subsequently, techniques from algebraic geometry -- notably, Groebner basis theory and technology -- are researched to perform reachability analysis and verification of sequential circuits. This approach adds a "word-level dimension" to state-space abstraction and verification to make the process more efficient. While algebraic geometry provides powerful abstraction and reasoning capabilities, the algorithms exhibit high computational complexity. In the dissertation, we show that by analyzing the constraints, it is possible to obtain more insights about the polynomial ideals, which can be exploited to overcome the complexity. Using our algorithm design and implementations, we demonstrate how to perform reachability analysis of finite-state machines purely at the word level. Using this concept, we perform scalable verification of sequential arithmetic circuits. As contemporary approaches make use of resolution proofs and unsatisfiable cores for state-space abstraction, we introduce the algebraic geometry analog of unsatisfiable cores, and present algorithms to extract and refine unsatisfiable cores of polynomial ideals. Experiments are performed to demonstrate the efficacy of our approaches

Doctor of Philosophy

dissertationWith the spread of internet and mobile devices, transferring information safely and securely has become more important than ever. Finite fields have widespread applications in such domains, such as in cryptography, error correction codes, among many others. In most finite field applications, the field size - and therefore the bit-width of the operands - can be very large. The high complexity of arithmetic operations over such large fields requires circuits to be (semi-) custom designed. This raises the potential for errors/bugs in the implementation, which can be maliciously exploited and can compromise the security of such systems. Formal verification of finite field arithmetic circuits has therefore become an imperative. This dissertation targets the problem of formal verification of hardware implementations of combinational arithmetic circuits over finite fields of the type F2k . Two specific problems are addressed: i) verifying the correctness of a custom-designed arithmetic circuit implementation against a given word-level polynomial specification over F2k ; and ii) gate-level equivalence checking of two different arithmetic circuit implementations. This dissertation proposes polynomial abstractions over finite fields to model and represent the circuit constraints. Subsequently, decision procedures based on modern computer algebra techniques - notably, Gr¨obner bases-related theory and technology - are engineered to solve the verification problem efficiently. The arithmetic circuit is modeled as a polynomial system in the ring F2k [x1, x2, · · · , xd], and computer algebrabased results (Hilbert's Nullstellensatz) over finite fields are exploited for verification. Using our approach, experiments are performed on a variety of custom-designed finite field arithmetic benchmark circuits. The results are also compared against contemporary methods, based on SAT and SMT solvers, BDDs, and AIG-based methods. Our tools can verify the correctness of, and detect bugs in, up to 163-bit circuits in F2163 , whereas contemporary approaches are infeasible beyond 48-bit circuits

ANALYSIS AND VERIFICATION OF ARITHMETIC CIRCUITS USING COMPUTER ALGEBRA APPROACH

Despite a considerable progress in verification of random and control logic, advances in formal verification of arithmetic designs have been lagging. This can be attributed mostly to the difficulty of efficient modeling of arithmetic circuits and data paths without resorting to computationally expensive Boolean methods, such as Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs) and Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) that require ``bit blasting\u27\u27, i.e., flattening the design to a bit-level netlist. Similarly, approaches that rely on computer algebra and Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) methods are either too abstract to handle the bit-level complexity of arithmetic designs or require solving computationally expensive decision or satisfiability problems. On the other hand, theorem provers, popular solvers used in industry, require a significant human interaction and intimate knowledge of the design to guide the proof process. The work proposed in this thesis aims at overcoming the limitations of verifying arithmetic circuits, especially at the post-synthesis, implementation phase. It addresses the verification problem at an algebraic level, treating an arithmetic circuit and its specification as an algebraic system. Specifically, verification approach employed in this work is based on the algebraic rewriting method. In this method, the circuit is modeled in the algebraic domain, where both the circuit specification and its gate-level implementation are represented as polynomials. This work formally analyzes the algebraic approach and compares it with the established computer algebra methods based on Grobner basis reduction. It shows that algebraic rewriting is more effective than the Grobner basis reduction from the computational point of view. This thesis addresses two classes of arithmetic circuits that could not directly benefit from this type of functional verification, since performing algebraic rewriting of such circuits encounters a serious memory issue. The circuits that fall in the first category are approximate arithmetic circuits, such as truncated integer multipliers. Different truncation schemes are considered, including bit deletion, bit truncation, and rounding. The proposed verification method is based on reconstructing the truncated multiplier to a complete, exact multiplier; it is then followed by algebraic rewriting to prove that it indeed implements multiplication over the required range of bits. The reconstruction of the multiplier helps avoid the memory overload issue as it creates a clean multiplier with a well defined specification polynomial. The other class of circuits that suffer from memory overload during algebraic rewriting are circuits subjected to some arithmetic constraints. An example of such circuits is a divider, where the divisor value cannot be zero. The other example can be found in the basic blocks of the constant divider, where the value of carry into each block must be less than the divisor value. In general, such constraints will be modeled using the concept of vanishing monomials. A case-splitting method is proposed along with the modified algebraic rewriting to resolve the memory issue. The proposed verification method not only can prove that the circuit performs a correct function under the desired (valid) conditions, but also will test all the undesired (invalid) cases. This work also addresses logic debugging of combinational arithmetic circuits over field F2k , including Galois field multipliers. Galois Field (GF) arithmetic has numerous applications in digital communication, cryptography and security engineering, and formal verification of such circuits is of prime importance. In addition to functional verification of GF multipliers, this work proposes a novel and effective method for identifying and correcting bugs in such circuits, commonly referred to as debugging. In this work we propose a novel approach to debugging of GF arithmetic circuits based on forward rewriting, which enables functional verification and debugging at the same time. This technique can handle multiple bugs, does not suffer from the polynomial size explosion encountered by other methods, and allows one to identify and automatically correct bugs in GF circuits. The techniques and algorithms proposed in this dissertation have been implemented in several computer programs, some stand-alone, and some integrated with a popular synthesis and verification tool, ABC. The experimental results for verification and debugging are compared with the state-of-the-art SAT, SMT, and other computer algebraic solvers

Synthesis and Optimization of Reversible Circuits - A Survey

Reversible logic circuits have been historically motivated by theoretical research in low-power electronics as well as practical improvement of bit-manipulation transforms in cryptography and computer graphics. Recently, reversible circuits have attracted interest as components of quantum algorithms, as well as in photonic and nano-computing technologies where some switching devices offer no signal gain. Research in generating reversible logic distinguishes between circuit synthesis, post-synthesis optimization, and technology mapping. In this survey, we review algorithmic paradigms --- search-based, cycle-based, transformation-based, and BDD-based --- as well as specific algorithms for reversible synthesis, both exact and heuristic. We conclude the survey by outlining key open challenges in synthesis of reversible and quantum logic, as well as most common misconceptions.Comment: 34 pages, 15 figures, 2 table

Formal Verification of Divider and Square-root Arithmetic Circuits Using Computer Algebra Methods

A considerable progress has been made in recent years in verification of arithmetic circuits such as multipliers, fused multiply-adders, multiply-accumulate, and other components of arithmetic datapaths, both in integer and finite field domain. However, the verification of hardware dividers and square-root functions have received only a limited attention from the verification community, with a notable exception for theorem provers and other inductive, non-automated systems. Division, square root, and transcendental functions are all tied to the basic Intel architecture and proving correctness of such algorithms is of grave importance. Although belonging to the same iterative-subtract class of architectures, they widely differ from each other. IEEE floating point standard specifies square-rooting and division as basic arithmetic operation alongside the usual three basic operations. The difficulty of formally verifying hardware implementation of a divider/square-root can be attributed mostly to the modeling of its characteristic function and the high memory complexity required by standard algebraic approach. The work proposed in this thesis discusses formal verification of combinational divider and square-root circuits. Specifically, it addresses the problem of formally verifying gate-level circuits using an algebraic model. In contrast to standard verification approaches using satisfiability (SAT) or equivalence checking, the proposed method verifies whether the gate-level circuit actually performs the intended function or not, without a need for a reference design. Firstly, we present a verification methodology for a constant divider, where the divisor value is fixed to a constant integer. Albeit simpler case of verification, it provides us with the basic understanding of verification techniques and the underlying issues applicable to divider verification. Secondly, a layered verification approach is proposed for the verification of generic array dividers. Finally, the work proposed in this thesis will further analyze the divider and square-root circuits and aim to curb the memory explosion issue experienced by computer algebra based verification methods in order to successfully verify large bit-width divider-type arithmetic circuits. More specifically, a novel idea of hardware rewriting is introduced, which avoids the high memory complexity. The mentioned technique verifies a 256-bit gate-level square-root circuit with around 260,000 gates in just under 18 minutes and 127-bit gate-level divider circuit in under one minute