Effect of promoter architecture on the cell-to-cell variability in gene expression

According to recent experimental evidence, the architecture of a promoter, defined as the number, strength and regulatory role of the operators that control the promoter, plays a major role in determining the level of cell-to-cell variability in gene expression. These quantitative experiments call for a corresponding modeling effort that addresses the question of how changes in promoter architecture affect noise in gene expression in a systematic rather than case-by-case fashion. In this article, we make such a systematic investigation, based on a simple microscopic model of gene regulation that incorporates stochastic effects. In particular, we show how operator strength and operator multiplicity affect this variability. We examine different modes of transcription factor binding to complex promoters (cooperative, independent, simultaneous) and how each of these affects the level of variability in transcription product from cell-to-cell. We propose that direct comparison between in vivo single-cell experiments and theoretical predictions for the moments of the probability distribution of mRNA number per cell can discriminate between different kinetic models of gene regulation.Comment: 35 pages, 6 figures, Submitte

Balancing noise and plasticity in eukaryotic gene expression

Coupling the control of expression stochasticity (noise) to the ability of expression change (plasticity) can alter gene function and influence adaptation. A number of factors, such as transcription re-initiation, strong chromatin regulation or genome neighboring organization, underlie this coupling. However, these factors do not necessarily combine in equivalent ways and strengths in all genes. Can we identify then alternative architectures that modulate in distinct ways the linkage of noise and plasticity? Here we first show that strong chromatin regulation, commonly viewed as a source of coupling, can lead to plasticity without noise. The nature of this regulation is relevant too, with plastic but noiseless genes being subjected to general activators whereas plastic and noisy genes experience more specific repression. Contrarily, in genes exhibiting poor transcriptional control, it is translational efficiency what separates noise from plasticity, a pattern related to transcript length. This additionally implies that genome neighboring organization -as modifier- appears only effective in highly plastic genes. In this class, we confirm bidirectional promoters (bipromoters) as a configuration capable to reduce coupling by abating noise but also reveal an important trade-off, since bipromoters also decrease plasticity. This presents ultimately a paradox between intergenic distances and modulation, with short intergenic distances both associated and disassociated to noise at different plasticity levels. Balancing the coupling among different types of expression variability appears as a potential shaping force of genome regulation and organization. This is reflected in the use of different control strategies at genes with different sets of functional constraints

Balancing noise and plasticity in gene expression

Coupling the control of expression stochasticity (noise) with the capacity to expression change (plasticity) can constrain gene function and limit adaptation. Which factors contribute then to modulate this coupling? Transcription re-initiation is generally associated with coupling and this is commonly related to strong chromatin regulation. We alternatively show how strong regulation can however lead to plasticity uncorrelated to noise. The character of the regulation is also relevant, with plastic but noiseless genes usually subjected to broad expression activation whereas plastic and noisy genes experience targeted repression. This differential action is similarly noticed in how histones influence these genes. In contrast, we find that translational mechanisms are the ones separating noise from plasticity in low-plastic genes, a pattern associated with the simplicity of their expression regulation. Neighboring genome architecture as modifier appears then only effective in highly plastic genes. This poses ultimately an interesting paradox between intergenic distances and modulation, with short intergenic distances both associated and not associated with noise at different plasticity levels. Balancing the coupling among different types of expression variability appears thus as a potential shaping force of genome architecture and regulation

Design of a bistable switch to control cellular uptake

International audienceBistable switches are widely used in synthetic biology to trigger cellular functions in response to environmental signals. All bistable switches developed so far, however, control the expression of target genes without access to other layers of the cellular machinery. Here, we propose a bistable switch to control the rate at which cells take up a metabolite from the environment. An uptake switch provides a new interface to command metabolic activity from the extracellular space and has great potential as a building block in more complex circuits that coordinate pathway activity across cell cultures, allocate metabolic tasks among different strains or require cell-to-cell communication with metabolic signals. Inspired by uptake systems found in nature, we propose to couple metabolite import and utilization with a genetic circuit under feedback regulation. Using mathematical models and analysis, we determined the circuit architectures that produce bistability and obtained their design space for bistability in terms of experimentally tuneable parameters. We found an activation–repression architecture to be the most robust switch because it displays bistability for the largest range of design parameters and requires little fine-tuning of the promoters' response curves. Our analytic results are based on on–off approximations of promoter activity and are in excellent qualitative agreement with simulations of more realistic models. With further analysis and simulation, we established conditions to maximize the parameter design space and to produce bimodal phenotypes via hysteresis and cell-to-cell variability. Our results highlight how mathematical analysis can drive the discovery of new circuits for synthetic biology, as the proposed circuit has all the hallmarks of a toggle switch and stands as a promising design to control metabolic phenotypes across cell cultures

Genetic determinants of co-accessible chromatin regions in activated T cells across humans.

Over 90% of genetic variants associated with complex human traits map to non-coding regions, but little is understood about how they modulate gene regulation in health and disease. One possible mechanism is that genetic variants affect the activity of one or more cis-regulatory elements leading to gene expression variation in specific cell types. To identify such cases, we analyzed ATAC-seq and RNA-seq profiles from stimulated primary CD4+ T cells in up to 105 healthy donors. We found that regions of accessible chromatin (ATAC-peaks) are co-accessible at kilobase and megabase resolution, consistent with the three-dimensional chromatin organization measured by in situ Hi-C in T cells. Fifteen percent of genetic variants located within ATAC-peaks affected the accessibility of the corresponding peak (local-ATAC-QTLs). Local-ATAC-QTLs have the largest effects on co-accessible peaks, are associated with gene expression and are enriched for autoimmune disease variants. Our results provide insights into how natural genetic variants modulate cis-regulatory elements, in isolation or in concert, to influence gene expression

The interaction of promoter chromatin architecture with the cell cycle regulates transcription activation kinetics

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, 2013.This electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.Cataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.Includes bibliographical references.The relationship between regulatory trans-factors binding a gene's cis-regulatory sequence elements and the transcriptional output of that gene is fundamental to even the most complex network behaviors such as metabolism and differentiation. In eukaryotes, chromatin dynamics on gene promoter sequences is an integral part of regulation, and nucleosome remodeling is often required for transcription activation. Though the transient response of these regulated genes is often important in biological contexts, the role of promoter chromatin architecture in activation kinetics is still unclear. We sought to investigate this relationship as well as possible links to the cell cycle, over which chromatin state experiences dramatic changes. To study the activation kinetics of individual promoters, we develop a method to infer real-time transcription rates from protein expression in single Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells using time-lapse fluorescence microscopy. Comparison between the instantaneous transcription rate and cell-cycle phase in each cell demonstrates the majority of transcriptional variability is due to cell cycle-dependent effects with noisy expression restricted to S/G2/M. This is in stark contrast to current stochastic models of gene expression, most of which do not account for extrinsic effects, and reveals a permissive activation period beginning each S-phase. We then employ a switchable transactivator system to probe transient response kinetics as a function of promoter chromatin architecture at the PHO5 promoter, a well-established model system for chromatin-regulated expression. While we show transactivator binding site affinity and location relative to nucleosomes influences promoter response kinetics, the effect is primarily through architecture-dependent reliance on a dominant, permissive activation period in S/G2. Together with similar observations at synthetic promoters using a chimerical, switchable transactivator, these results suggest the cell cycle has a general role in transcription activation. Based on the timing of the permissive period, DNA replication may play a direct role in transactivation. Thus, in network topologies involving noisy genes and positive feedback, the cell cycle-dependent transcription would lead to distinct predictions between frequently- and non-dividing cells. This work reveals an unappreciated yet dominant role for the cell cycle as a general regulator of transcription in eukaryotes with direct implications in better modeling and design of biological networks.by Christopher J. Zopf.Ph.D

A stochastic and dynamical view of pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells

Pluripotent embryonic stem cells are of paramount importance for biomedical research thanks to their innate ability for self-renewal and differentiation into all major cell lines. The fateful decision to exit or remain in the pluripotent state is regulated by complex genetic regulatory network. Latest advances in transcriptomics have made it possible to infer basic topologies of pluripotency governing networks. The inferred network topologies, however, only encode boolean information while remaining silent about the roles of dynamics and molecular noise in gene expression. These features are widely considered essential for functional decision making. Herein we developed a framework for extending the boolean level networks into models accounting for individual genetic switches and promoter architecture which allows mechanistic interrogation of the roles of molecular noise, external signaling, and network topology. We demonstrate the pluripotent state of the network to be a broad attractor which is robust to variations of gene expression. Dynamics of exiting the pluripotent state, on the other hand, is significantly influenced by the molecular noise originating from genetic switching events which makes cells more responsive to extracellular signals. Lastly we show that steady state probability landscape can be significantly remodeled by global gene switching rates alone which can be taken as a proxy for how global epigenetic modifications exert control over stability of pluripotent states.Comment: 11 pages, 7 figure