125,755 research outputs found

    MS-110: Fannie Hurst Newsletter Collection

    Full text link
    Much of this collection is comprised of drafts and final copies of the Fannie Hurst Newsletter (published from 1991-1995), material submitted for publication, and some promotional material. The collection also includes a substantial amount of correspondence, comprised mostly of letters and a several e-mails. Special Collections and College Archives Finding Aids are discovery tools used to describe and provide access to our holdings. Finding aids include historical and biographical information about each collection in addition to inventories of their content. More information about our collections can be found on our website http://www.gettysburg.edu/special_collections/collections/.https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/findingaidsall/1099/thumbnail.jp

    Libya: A Multilateral Constitutional Moment?

    Get PDF
    The Libya intervention of 2011 marked the first time that the UN Security Council invoked the “responsibility to protect” principle (RtoP) to authorize use of force by UN member states. In this comment the author argues that the Security Council’s invocation of RtoP in the midst of the Libyan crisis significantly deepens the broader, ongoing transformation in the international law system’s approach to sovereignty and civilian protection. This transformation away from the traditional Westphalian notion of sovereignty has been unfolding for decades, but the Libyan case represents a further normative shift from sovereignty as a right to sovereignty as a responsibility. This significant normative moment demonstrates how far international law has traveled and also where it has not yet traveled. The Libyan case was propelled by a mass movement in Libya, in the region, and ultimately in the international community, which mobilized Security Council action, relying on RtoP, to protect civilians in the face of brutality. In response to Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi’s threat to slaughter his own people amid the “Arab Spring” of 2011, the Security Council authorized, inter alia, a limited military intervention to protect Libyan civilians, invoking RtoP. The assumption under RtoP is that individual states have primary responsibility for civilian protection and that, as a backstop, the international community has subsidiary responsibility for civilian protection by preventing and rapidly responding to genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity. Military intervention pursuant to RtoP is, against that background, an option of last resort, when the other, more modest measures preferred as initial steps have failed (as discussed further in part II). Significantly, in the Libyan case, it was the Libyan people—as represented by an opposition movement (including numerous defecting government officials) that was demanding a more representative government—who called for Security Council intervention to mobilize an effective civilian-protection effort

    Editorial Comments

    Get PDF

    Download the full PDF of Jefferson Surgical Solutions Fall 2009, Volume 4, Number 2.

    Get PDF

    Time Management Strategies for Research Productivity

    Get PDF
    Researchers function in a complex environment and carry multiple role responsibilities. This environment is prone to various distractions that can derail productivity and decrease efficiency. Effective time management allows researchers to maintain focus on their work, contributing to research productivity. Thus, improving time management skills is essential to developing and sustaining a successful program of research. This article presents time management strategies addressing behaviors surrounding time assessment, planning, and monitoring. Herein, the Western Journal of Nursing Research editorial board recommends strategies to enhance time management, including setting realistic goals, prioritizing, and optimizing planning. Involving a team, problem-solving barriers, and early management of potential distractions can facilitate maintaining focus on a research program. Continually evaluating the effectiveness of time management strategies allows researchers to identify areas of improvement and recognize progress

    Does the Pharmaceutical Sector Have a Coresponsibility for the Human Right to Health?

    Get PDF
    The highest attainable standard of health is a fundamental human right, which has been part of international law since 1948. States and their institutions are the primary duty bearers responsible for ensuring that human rights are respected, protected, and fulfilled. However, more recently it has been argued that pharmaceutical companies have a coresponsibility to fulfill the human right to health. Most prominently, this coresponsibility has been expressed in the United Nations (UN) Millennium Goal 8 Target 4. “In cooperation with pharmaceutical companies, provide access to affordable essential drugs in developing countries.

    Editorial

    Get PDF

    New Technology, Old Problem: Determining First Amendment Status of Electronic Information Services

    Get PDF

    The Case for Legal Regulation of Physicians’ Off-Label Prescribing

    Get PDF
    Deafness has been associated with poor abilities to deal with digits in the context of arithmetic and memory, and language modality-specific differences in the phonological similarity of digits have been shown to influence short-term memory (STM). Therefore, the overall aim of the present thesis was to find out whether language modality-specific differences in phonological processing between sign and speech can explain why deaf signers perform at lower levels than hearing peers when dealing with digits. To explore this aim, the role of phonological processing in digit-based arithmetic and memory tasks was investigated, using both behavioural and neuroimaging methods, in adult deaf signers and hearing non-signers, carefully matched on age, sex, education and non-verbal intelligence. To make task demands as equal as possible for both groups, and to control for material effects, arithmetic, phonological processing, STM and working memory (WM) were all assessed using the same presentation and response mode for both groups. The results suggested that in digit-based STM, phonological similarity of manual numerals causes deaf signers to perform more poorly than hearing non-signers. However, for  digit-based WM there was no difference between the groups, possibly due to differences in allocation of resources during WM. This indicates that similar WM for the two groups can be generalized from lexical items to digits. Further, we found that in the present work deaf signers performed better than expected and on a par with hearing peers on all arithmetic tasks, except for multiplication, possibly because the groups studied here were very carefully matched. However, the neural networks recruited for arithmetic and phonology differed between groups. During multiplication tasks, deaf signers showed an increased  reliance on cortex of the right parietal lobe complemented by the left inferior frontal gyrus. In contrast, hearing non-signers relied on cortex of the left frontal and parietal lobes during multiplication. This suggests that while hearing non-signers recruit phonology-dependent arithmetic fact retrieval processes for multiplication, deaf signers recruit non-verbal magnitude manipulation processes. For phonology, the hearing non-signers engaged left lateralized frontal and parietal areas within the classical perisylvian language network. In deaf signers, however, phonological processing was limited to cortex of the left occipital lobe, suggesting that sign-based phonological processing does not necessarily activate the classical language network. In conclusion, the findings of the present thesis suggest that language modality-specific differences between sign and speech in different ways can explain why deaf signers perform at lower levels than hearing non-signers on tasks that include dealing with digits.Dövhet har kopplats till bristande förmÄga att hantera siffror inom omrÄdena aritmetik och minne. SÀrskilt har sprÄkmodalitetsspecifika skillnader i fonologisk likhet för siffror visat sig pÄverka korttidsminnet. Det övergripande syftet med den hÀr avhandlingen var dÀrför att undersöka om sprÄkmodalitetsspecifika skillnader i fonologisk bearbetning mellan teckenoch talsprÄk kan förklara varför döva presterar sÀmre Àn hörande pÄ sifferuppgifter. För att utforska det omrÄdet undersöktes fonologisk bearbetning i sifferbaserade minnesuppgifter och aritmetik med hjÀlp av bÄde beteendevetenskapliga metoder och hjÀrnavbildning hos grupper av teckensprÄkiga döva och talsprÄkiga hörande som matchats noggrant pÄ Älder, kön, utbildning och icke-verbal intelligens. För att testförhÄllandena skulle bli sÄ likartade som möjligt för de bÄda grupperna, och för att förebygga materialeffekter, anvÀndes samma presentations- och svarssÀtt för bÄda grupperna. Resultaten visade att vid sifferbaserat korttidsminne pÄverkas de dövas prestation av de tecknade siffrornas fonologiska likhet. DÀremot fanns det ingen skillnad mellan grupperna gÀllande sifferbaserat arbetsminne, vilket kan bero pÄ att de bÄda grupperna fördelar sina kognitiva resurser pÄ olika sÀtt. Dessutom fann vi att den grupp teckensprÄkiga döva som deltog i studien presterade bÀttre pÄ aritmetik Àn vad tidigare forskning visat och de skiljde sig bara frÄn hörande pÄ multiplikationsuppgifter, vilket kan bero pÄ att grupperna var sÄ noggrant matchade. DÀremot fanns det skillnader mellan grupperna i vilka neurobiologiska nÀtverk som aktiverades vid aritmetik och fonologi. Vid multiplikationsuppgifter aktiverades cortex i höger parietallob och vÀnster frontallob för de teckensprÄkiga döva, medan cortex i vÀnster frontal- och parietallob aktiverades för de talsprÄkiga hörande. Detta indikerar att de talsprÄkiga hörande förlitar sig pÄ fonologiberoende minnesstrategier medan de teckensprÄkiga döva förlitar sig pÄ ickeverbal magnitudmanipulering och artikulatoriska processer. Under den fonologiska uppgiften aktiverade de talsprÄkiga hörande vÀnsterlateraliserade frontala och parietala omrÄden inom det klassiska sprÄknÀtverket. För de teckensprÄkiga döva var fonologibearbetningen begrÀnsad till cortex i vÀnster occipitallob, vilket tyder pÄ att teckensprÄksbaserad fonologi inte behöver aktivera det klassiska sprÄknÀtverket. Sammanfattningsvis visar fynden i den hÀr avhandlingen att sprÄkmodalitetsspecifika skillnader mellan tecken- och talsprÄk pÄ olika sÀtt kan förklara varför döva presterar sÀmre Àn hörande pÄ vissa sifferbaserade uppgifter

    Why So Slow: A Comparative View of Women\u27s Political Leadership

    Get PDF
    • 

    corecore