75 research outputs found
Asynchronous Early Output Dual-Bit Full Adders Based on Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Delay-Insensitive Data Encoding
This paper presents the designs of asynchronous early output dual-bit full
adders without and with redundant logic (implicit) corresponding to homogeneous
and heterogeneous delay-insensitive data encoding. For homogeneous
delay-insensitive data encoding only dual-rail i.e. 1-of-2 code is used, and
for heterogeneous delay-insensitive data encoding 1-of-2 and 1-of-4 codes are
used. The 4-phase return-to-zero protocol is used for handshaking. To
demonstrate the merits of the proposed dual-bit full adder designs, 32-bit
ripple carry adders (RCAs) are constructed comprising dual-bit full adders. The
proposed dual-bit full adders based 32-bit RCAs incorporating redundant logic
feature reduced latency and area compared to their non-redundant counterparts
with no accompanying power penalty. In comparison with the weakly indicating
32-bit RCA constructed using homogeneously encoded dual-bit full adders
containing redundant logic, the early output 32-bit RCA comprising the proposed
homogeneously encoded dual-bit full adders with redundant logic reports
corresponding reductions in latency and area by 22.2% and 15.1% with no
associated power penalty. On the other hand, the early output 32-bit RCA
constructed using the proposed heterogeneously encoded dual-bit full adder
which incorporates redundant logic reports respective decreases in latency and
area than the weakly indicating 32-bit RCA that consists of heterogeneously
encoded dual-bit full adders with redundant logic by 21.5% and 21.3% with nil
power overhead. The simulation results obtained are based on a 32/28nm CMOS
process technology
Latency Optimized Asynchronous Early Output Ripple Carry Adder based on Delay-Insensitive Dual-Rail Data Encoding
Asynchronous circuits employing delay-insensitive codes for data
representation i.e. encoding and following a 4-phase return-to-zero protocol
for handshaking are generally robust. Depending upon whether a single
delay-insensitive code or multiple delay-insensitive code(s) are used for data
encoding, the encoding scheme is called homogeneous or heterogeneous
delay-insensitive data encoding. This article proposes a new latency optimized
early output asynchronous ripple carry adder (RCA) that utilizes single-bit
asynchronous full adders (SAFAs) and dual-bit asynchronous full adders (DAFAs)
which incorporate redundant logic and are based on the delay-insensitive
dual-rail code i.e. homogeneous data encoding, and follow a 4-phase
return-to-zero handshaking. Amongst various RCA, carry lookahead adder (CLA),
and carry select adder (CSLA) designs, which are based on homogeneous or
heterogeneous delay-insensitive data encodings which correspond to the
weak-indication or the early output timing model, the proposed early output
asynchronous RCA that incorporates SAFAs and DAFAs with redundant logic is
found to result in reduced latency for a dual-operand addition operation. In
particular, for a 32-bit asynchronous RCA, utilizing 15 stages of DAFAs and 2
stages of SAFAs leads to reduced latency. The theoretical worst-case latencies
of the different asynchronous adders were calculated by taking into account the
typical gate delays of a 32/28nm CMOS digital cell library, and a comparison is
made with their practical worst-case latencies estimated. The theoretical and
practical worst-case latencies show a close correlation....Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1704.0761
Approximate Early Output Asynchronous Adders Based on Dual-Rail Data Encoding and 4-Phase Return-to-Zero and Return-to-One Handshaking
Approximate computing is emerging as an alternative to accurate computing due
to its potential for realizing digital circuits and systems with low power
dissipation, less critical path delay, and less area occupancy for an
acceptable trade-off in the accuracy of results. In the domain of computer
arithmetic, several approximate adders and multipliers have been designed and
their potential have been showcased versus accurate adders and multipliers for
practical digital signal processing applications. Nevertheless, in the existing
literature, almost all the approximate adders and multipliers reported
correspond to the synchronous design method. In this work, we consider robust
asynchronous i.e. quasi-delay-insensitive realizations of approximate adders by
employing delay-insensitive codes for data representation and processing, and
the 4-phase handshake protocols for data communication. The 4-phase handshake
protocols used are the return-to-zero and the return-to-one protocols.
Specifically, we consider the implementations of 32-bit approximate adders
based on the return-to-zero and return-to-one handshake protocols by adopting
the delay-insensitive dual-rail code for data encoding. We consider a range of
approximations varying from 4-bits to 20-bits for the least significant
positions of the accurate 32-bit asynchronous adder. The asynchronous adders
correspond to early output (i.e. early reset) type, which are based on the
well-known ripple carry adder architecture. The experimental results show that
approximate asynchronous adders achieve reductions in the design metrics such
as latency, cycle time, average power dissipation, and silicon area compared to
the accurate asynchronous adders. Further, the reductions in the design metrics
are greater for the return-to-one protocol compared to the return-to-zero
protocol. The design metrics were estimated using a 32/28nm CMOS technology.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1711.0233
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF QUASI-DELAY-INSENSITIVE ASYNCHRONOUS ADDERS CORRESPONDING TO RETURN-TO-ZERO AND RETURN-TO-ONE HANDSHAKING
This article makes a comparative evaluation of quasi-delay-insensitive (QDI) asynchronous adders, realized using the delay-insensitive dual-rail code, which adhere to 4-phase return-to-zero (RTZ) and 4-phase return-to-one (RTO) handshake protocols. The QDI adders realized correspond to the following adder architectures: i) ripple carry adder, ii) carry lookahead adder, and iii) carry select adder. The QDI adders correspond to three different timing regimes viz. strong-indication, weak-indication and early output. They are physically implemented using a 32/28nm CMOS process. The comparative evaluation shows that, overall, QDI adders which correspond to the 4-phase RTO handshake protocol are better than the QDI adder counterparts which correspond to the 4-phase RTZ handshake protocol in terms of latency, area, and average power dissipation
- …